Jonathan Fairfield Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 Charter court accepts media share cases of 32 pro-government MPs The Constitutional Court today (Wednesday) agreed to accept for consideration the cases of 32 pro-government MPs accused by the opposition Future Forward party of owning or holding shares in media companies in violation of the election law. At the same time, the court decided to drop the cases of nine other pro-government MPs facing similar allegations on the grounds that the evidence, presented by the Future Forward party in the form of memoranda of association of companies registered at the Business Development Department, did not clearly indicate the firms intended to engage in the media business. The nine MPs who were let off the hook were Mr. Sastra Sriparn, Mr. Surasak Chingnawan, Ms. Parim Pooncharoen, Ms. Pareena Kraikupt, Mr. Chaivuth Thanakamansorn, Mr. Chakkrabhand Pornnimit, Mr. Korn Chatikavanich, Mr. Pramual Pongwarade and Mr. Akkaradet Wongpitakrote. Since these cases were dropped, the court did not consider the Future Forward party’s demand that they should be suspended from performing their duty as MPs. Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/charter-court-accepts-media-share-cases-of-32-pro-government-mps/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-06-27 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailand Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 Oops! Looks like the little generals are having some more problems,anyone feel sorry for them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornishcarlos Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 So not suspended then !! Farce.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YetAnother Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 44 minutes ago, Jonathan Fairfield said: At the same time, the court decided to drop the cases of nine other pro-government MPs equal justice for all, except when it isnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeneeds Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 A rule for them and an adjusted rule for us, that's fair ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lungstib Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 And now we are all just waiting for that laughable reason why its not the same. From the watch collection, the PPRP fund raising dinner to the reason why Prayuth is not a state official, we are being treated to the stupid and the insane and being told to get used to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy cow cm Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 Al I can say with my coffee is: hahahahahahahahahaha, I hope it feels good ole fat head, toad boy and the P council. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatOngo Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 53 minutes ago, Thailand said: Oops! Looks like the little generals are having some more problems,anyone feel sorry for them? Oh how my heart bleeds! ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eligius Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 The court 'will consider' these case. Of course. Such types 'considered' them several years ago and already decided then in principle that no junta-supporting persons or parties can ever do any wrong. Case closed. Note that nine of the criticised persons have immediately been found spotless and pure, and that none of the remaining 'to-be-considered' persons has been instantly suspended - as was Thanathorn. Great to live in a land of impartial, sagely law and order! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmitch Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Now I know where the famous Thai saying comes from: Same same but different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinsdale Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Thailand said: Oops! Looks like the little generals are having some more problems,anyone feel sorry for them? Looks like quite the opposite to me. 9 off the hook 32 to go. Do you think the result will be different. Consitutionl Court. Hfff! Just another arm of the junta. And yes, I still call them the junta as they were not democratically elected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannork Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Time can be so useful at times. I believe it took nearly 400 days before the verdict on ownership of media shares by the wife of Foreign Minister Mr Don was reached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denim Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Well, I got that wrong. Thought they would find some pathetic excuse to not accept these cases. Guess the media frenzy got to them. Still, when it all shakes out it won't come to anything. This will drag on and fizzle out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Lets see if 9 is a significant number my guess it will be???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutz Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 A fine example of double standards. No suspension for Phalang Pracharat MPs, while FFP candidate Phubet Henlod was disqualified for the very same accusations. And Thanathorn is suspended for nearly identical accusations. I wonder what the differences are? Oh.. "khon dee" vs "evil closet commies" who battle pizza laws. I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 10 hours ago, bannork said: Time can be so useful at times. I believe it took nearly 400 days before the verdict on ownership of media shares by the wife of Foreign Minister Mr Don was reached. Such a quick decision, considering most cases before the courts are usually much longer, that's if they even proceed - unless of course you're a troglodyte then decisions are made before it even starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chama Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 So is the court just taking these cases to look legitimate and will eventually find no violations or are they really going to dig into the claims of violations? A lot of factors can impact the dynamics of how the court performs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 "The court explained that the cases of the 32 MPs were different from that of Future Forward party leader Thanathorn Jungroongruangkit, who was suspended from his duties for holding shares in V-Luck Media Company when he registered his election candidacy. Seriously ? even considering there is evidence he actually sold the shares before the deadline to do so ? Yet now all of a sudden 32 others are not suspended because they probably still own the shares Unbelieveable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.