Jump to content
BANGKOK 24 July 2019 00:26
webfact

Trump rips tech firms at 'free speech' summit

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The Democrats lost because they ran the devil incarnate as their candidate. Any opponent could have won that election. 

Edited by canuckamuck
  • Like 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mlmcleod said:

That is because their views make the Nazis look like boy scouts!  There is a limit to free speech.  You can't shout fire in a packed movie theatre. You can't deny the holocaust!  They are the biggest pack of Nazi's, KKK members, liars and loonies that the right can produce!  My father fought in World War II because of these kinds of people.

 

The last thing that Trump really wants is free speech anyway.  Like Big Brother he only wants his message pasted everywhere.

Actually, you can in the USA. But not on a privately owned platform if the powers that be choose to ban you. As in this forum, for example.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, mlmcleod said:

That is because their views make the Nazis look like boy scouts!  There is a limit to free speech.  You can't shout fire in a packed movie theatre. You can't deny the holocaust!  They are the biggest pack of Nazi's, KKK members, liars and loonies that the right can produce!  My father fought in World War II because of these kinds of people.

 

The last thing that Trump really wants is free speech anyway.  Like Big Brother he only wants his message pasted everywhere.

You SJW / Antifa types call everyone with a different political viewpoint "Nazis". so meaningless in this day and age. A few of the commentators affected by the banning include Ben Shapiro (jewish),  Candice Owens (black woman), Milo Yanopolis (gay, Jewish, married to a black man), Jon Miller (black) Andy Gno (Vietnamese) ...all good Nazis I'm sure. You can yell fire in a theatre IF there is a fire.  Trump derangement syndrome, sad but amusing.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, daoyai said:

Great to see the prez defending constitutional rights from the loony left. ... they hate freedom.

Image associée

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, daoyai said:

You SJW / Antifa types call everyone with a different political viewpoint "Nazis". so meaningless in this day and age. A few of the commentators affected by the banning include Ben Shapiro (jewish),  Candice Owens (black woman), Milo Yanopolis (gay, Jewish, married to a black man), Jon Miller (black) Andy Gno (Vietnamese) ...all good Nazis I'm sure. You can yell fire in a theatre IF there is a fire.  Trump derangement syndrome, sad but amusing.

Trump threatens NBC's license over 'fake news' report

https://www.cnet.com/news/donald-trump-threatens-nbc-license-fake-news-report/

Trump just stepped up his calls to open up libel laws and weaken First Amendment protections

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-first-amendment-libel-2016-10

Edited by bristolboy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prove it free speech man-it should not be hard to prove, just test the their systems

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It seems your brand of bs is also getting the desired exposure.

The POTUS has exposed their brand of Activism.Most of these MSM owners permit this type of reporting example ,the constant beat of the bias drum .Im not talkin so much opinion news either.

How many positive news stories about the economy ,lower food stamp recipients ,more minorities working ever before,more jobs,exposing other countries like China with their bad trade policies have MSM outlets given time too.24 /7 mostly negative .

How many expose Antifa or the homeless that pitch tents in the inner cities and seem more concerned with illegals being taken care of.

I must say when they asked than candidate Trump if he would accept his defeat and concede to HC turned ugly for them.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, riclag said:

The POTUS has exposed their brand of Activism.Most of these MSM owners permit this type of reporting example ,the constant beat of the bias drum .Im not talkin so much opinion news either.

How many positive news stories about the economy ,lower food stamp recipients ,more minorities working ever before,more jobs,exposing other countries like China with their bad trade policies have MSM outlets given time too.24 /7 mostly negative .

How many expose Antifa or the homeless that pitch tents in the inner cities and seem more concerned with illegals being taken care of.

I must say when they asked than candidate Trump if he would accept his defeat and concede to HC turned ugly for them.

 

…hey Riclag hows that deficit doing are we paying it down during good economic times?how your health care?how do you like paying donalds tariffs?donalds tax scam cost me bigly the average joe is still struggling and not reaping any reward from donalds economy it works good for the rich folks though 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, daoyai said:

Fake? most of the participants attending this meeting have been deplatformed, banned or or otherwise censored on youtube, FB, google etc. ... this is real.

Banned from privately owned networks for peddling hate, lies or otherwise breaching the terms of service they signed up to.

 

People who express views that don’t breach the terms of service don’t get banned.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Banned from privately owned networks for peddling hate, lies or otherwise breaching the terms of service they signed up to.

 

People who express views that don’t breach the terms of service don’t get banned.

 

 

 

 

 

Nope, not as simplistic as that, they are banned and censored for different view points. The media bias toward leftist, democrat views is well documented. Most conservative writers are well aware of terms of service and are careful to stay in bounds.

 

This issue will be resolved soon as big tech monopolies are investigated for their manipulation and subverting of the first amendment.

 

 The video of mainstream media meltdown in the rose garden following the White House meeting on this issue is quite amusing.   

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“So to me, free speech is not when you see something good and then you purposely write bad, to me that’s very dangerous speech, and you become angry at it,” said Trump. “But that’s not free speech.”

That is Trumps deranged view of "Trumpism Free speech" in his own words- you must talk good things about him only for it to qualify. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, bristolboy said:

Trump threatens NBC's license over 'fake news' report

https://www.cnet.com/news/donald-trump-threatens-nbc-license-fake-news-report/

Trump just stepped up his calls to open up libel laws and weaken First Amendment protections

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-first-amendment-libel-2016-10

 

That's what's called rhetoric. It's not real. It has no basis in fact. Nobody's gonna weaken 1st Amendment protections, least of all Trump. His supporters count on the 1st Amendment to protect them from the ramifications of the bullshit they spew.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...