Jump to content

Thai prime minister declares end of military rule


webfact

Recommended Posts

From the book “how to become prime minister- for dummies”

1.       Choose a nice tropical country with a fatalist population

2.       Buy yourself up the ranks in the military

3.       Stage a coup d’etat

4.       Secure absolute power by conveniently modifying the constitution

5.       Silence even the slightest opposition by force (kill the best and buy the rest)

6.       Take control over the media, internet, and private phone conversations

7.       Promise the uneducated masses a “free & fair” election (under your  conditions)

8.       Organize PR tours and spread some crumbs among the peasants, and promise whatsoever

9.       Make sure your party wins the “election” by all means, and form a panel of handpicked senators to vote you in as the new PM

10.   Now change uniforms from olive to white, declare the country a “true democracy” and cash in…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, colinneil said:

End of military rule That is until the next time.

No worries though, he has stockpiled lots of teddies from the crane machines, ready to throw out the pram next time he throws a tantrum.

Yes, but he forgot to add the teddies from the two crane machines in Panthip, Chiangmai which were in full swing last Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha formally resigned as the head of the military government on Monday, saying the country would function as a normal democracy after five years of military rule.

What does the general mean by "normal democracy"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

"Thailand is now fully a democratic country with a constitutional monarchy, with a parliament whose members are elected," Prayuth said.

By Who?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 30la said:

What does the general mean by "normal democracy"?

He can say it with a straight face because in reality, he has no idea what constitutes a "normal democracy".

 

Sad but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Oziex1 said:

The end of military rule,  says the man in a uniform. 

That's not a military uniform he's wearing at his swearing in (no parachute wings).

 

Article 44 is repealed, the army is back in their barracks, no more media suppression and open, public discourse is restored without fear of being taken away in the dark of night to an army camp for questioning. The future's so bright... I'm booking a ticket for this Saturday so I can return to this beautiful new, true democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a strange definition of a "normal democracy", with one house being entirely appointed by the military government, and votes for the other house being gerrymandered to favour parties regarded as friendly to the military government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, madmen said:



No protesters still!

If they don't protest now they never will
It's game over, nothing more to see folks

Protesters are living under threat of murder, and are being forced to leave Thailand only to be killed in Laos or on the Thai Vietnamese border. Very democratic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Prayuth, in a televised address to the nation, said military rule had brought success in many areas, from fixing the problem of illegal fishing and human trafficking, to the rescue of 12 boys and their soccer coach trapped in a flooded cave last year."

 

That seems to be all old biscuit head has - and of course he played a huge role in the cave rescue. Meanwhile the most corrupt parts of Thai society - the police, customs, military and self anointed elite – have had a roaringly good and heavily protected few years as they stripped the nation's coffers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all that 'military influence' within this 'democratic government' I would suggest that the PM look up in dictionaries as to what 'military' is and isn't...'cos he obviously doesn't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lungstib said:

It is this, of course, that needs to be challenged. A law or rule from 100 years ago that allows the military to intervene in such a way and for such a time needs to be removed as soon as possible.

There me was thinking, how can a general of the military, who by this rule of law, be entrusted as caretaker of the government until everything is restored, run for the Prime Ministership ?

 

I mean wasn't he supposed to hand over after the democratically held elections had taken place ?

 

Hmm, he must have changed the constitution and actually ran for the Prime Ministership and made sure that 250 senate seats would stay in place for his military mates for 20 years under that altered constitution.

 

The above said, me is only guessing because he is no longer the general as he resigned that position recently and is now the PM, nudge nudge wink wink, say no more ????

 

Hopefully the challenge can find the wording in the constitution that states that an active military member cannot run for the senate or the position of Prime Minister until he has resigned, and the reason for that is so he can then change the constitution again, saying that an active military member can run for the senate and Prime Minister, so that we don't have to go through another coupe.

 

Like I said, was just thinking.

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...