Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Booming regional meth industry – Thailand, Myanmar, China and Laos

Recommended Posts

Booming regional meth industry – Thailand, Myanmar, China and Laos

 

bb3a18008e065266cd28c0a685ce0a68e33017cb

By The Thaiger

 

A UN Office of Drugs and Crime report released last week states that the methamphetamine trade is now worth between US$30-61 billion per year in East and South East Asia, Australia, New Zealand and Bangladesh.

 

That figure is up from US$15 billion a year, nearly a decade ago, the last time the UNODC estimated the value of the methamphetamine trade in the region.

 

Better enforcement, co-operation with neighbouring governments, increased manpower, more sophisticated surveillance and increased numbers of seizures have happened whilst the trade in meth has blossomed in the region.

 

Methamphetamine pills (aka. yaba in Thailand) are now being sold at highly discounted prices, and the well publicised massive seizures and interceptions do little to dent the operations of highly sophisticated and tech-savvy drug traffickers. Even the crystal methamphetamine (ice) from the region is feeding demand as far away as New Zealand.

 

Experts say the boom in South East Asia’s methamphetamine industry is the result of a series of regional and political factors, which have seen Myanmar’s lawless Shan State emerge as the regional meth factory.

 

The Shan State is in Myanmar’s north-east and borders Thailand, Laos and China.

 

From the 1970s to the 1990s, Myanmar’s lawless Shan State warlords, militias and rebel groups typically sold opium and heroin, but subsequently shifted to synthetic drugs after realising how much easier they were to produce and more profitable they could be.

 

Lax enforcement in Shan State, coupled with porous borders, enabled methamphetamine producers to easily import the chemicals needed to make meth. Poorly enforced money laundering controls then allowed kingpins to easily clean their millions and flourish.

 

At the same time significant investment has been made in new highways and bridges in an out of Myanmar, Thailand, China, Laos, Bangladesh and Vietnam. This has provided a boom in movement of products like food and clothing. And drugs. In the ‘Law of Unintended Consequences’, China’s Belt & Road strategy to open up trade routes throughout Asia, has inadvertently made trafficking drugs a lot easier.

 

Myanmar-Map-1000x601.jpg

 

Routinely, seizures of truckloads of 1-5 million meth pills are intercepted then paraded by Thai police. But the biggest drug haul was in 2018 when authorities seized a record-breaking 120 tonnes of crystal meth and methamphetamine pills coming out of the Golden Triangle. More than half of the busts took place in Thailand, where authorities confiscated more than 515 million meth pills.

 

Now, Laos and Malaysia are also reporting record-breaking busts. In the first eight months of 2018 Chinese authorities reported a 22x increase in crystal methamphetamine seizures in Yunnan province, alone, compared with just three years before.

 

The UNODC report also states that organised crime groups are not only moving “staggering” amounts of meth to meet demand, they are also trying to increase that demand by flooding the region with cheap product. That’s led methamphetamine pill prices to hit historic lows. The flood also creates greater need and a myriad of social problems.

 

Pills are reportedly selling for less than US$1 (30 baht), even lower than the going price two decades ago.

 

At the start of this year Thai authorities began an “intensification campaign” along Thailand’s northern border with Myanmar. That’s where the main route south begins through Thailand. But those efforts, and the vast amounts of international investment to open new routes in and around the region, has just sent enterprising traffickers to use new routes, too numerous for effective enforcement.

 

John  Coyne, a former Australian Federal Police official says the capacity for cashed-up and smart producers to simply ramp up production is allowing meth producers “to write off large seizures as a cost of doing business.”

 

“There needs to be a distinct rethink on what we do.”

 

Source: https://thethaiger.com/hot-news/crime/south-east-asias-booming-meth-industry-thailand-myanmar-china-and-laos

 

 

thtthaiger.png

-- © Copyright The Thaiger 2019-07-22

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look for the old people with the red teeth....no wait!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bomb them back to the stone age. Shouldn't take long. 

If ever there was a case for Military intervention this has got to be it. Forget the normal protocols just do it. It happens when oil is involved. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, FarFlungFalang said:

If you take my suggestion of legalising meth (decriminalise if you prefer) in context as a better option than bombing people back to the stone age then tell me I'm not very bright (being bright is not one of my strongest attributes).The difference between legalising and decriminalising in this sense is negligible.

   Having to deal with my stepson's going in and out of gaol and the Ubon mental hospital for the past ten years(He was just readmitted a week ago) and dealing with mental illness complicated by the use of meth (yah bah) including threatening me with machete in each hand,I'm pretty sure I have some understand of the effects meth has on people.

You are confused. I never mentioned bombing anyone.

 

So your stepson's conditioned is made worse by meth, and you claim to understand the effects it has on people, and you still want to legalize it?

 

Legalise and Decriminalise and not even close to the same thing. Google it.

 

How do you think your debate is going so far for you?

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, DLock said:

You are confused. I never mentioned bombing anyone.

 

So your stepson's conditioned is made worse by meth, and you claim to understand the effects it has on people, and you still want to legalize it?

 

Legalise and Decriminalise and not even close to the same thing. Google it.

 

How do you think your debate is going so far for you?

 

2 hours ago, Oziex1 said:

Bomb them back to the stone age. Shouldn't take long. 

If ever there was a case for Military intervention this has got to be it. Forget the normal protocols just do it. It happens when oil is involved. 

Here is the post I was replying to I know you never mentioned bombing anyone the guy in the post I was replying to mentioned bombing.You try and say I'm confused if all you like but it is plain for anyone to see that you are the confused.

    I don't need to google legalise and decriminalise When comparing the two in relation to bombing people back to the stone age I would take either one I really am in no way preferential to either option.

    I personally think my debate is going much better than your feeble attempt appearing to be intelligent.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FarFlungFalang said:

 

Here is the post I was replying to I know you never mentioned bombing anyone the guy in the post I was replying to mentioned bombing.You try and say I'm confused if all you like but it is plain for anyone to see that you are the confused.

    I don't need to google legalise and decriminalise When comparing the two in relation to bombing people back to the stone age I would take either one I really am in no way preferential to either option.

    I personally think my debate is going much better than your feeble attempt appearing to be intelligent.

In spite of my post I certainly hope we don't resort to aerial bombing of these countries, I'm just so frustrated by ineffective law enforcement.

The movement of this contraband continues on a huge scale with the assistance of the corrupt officials from all countries including the Western countries.

A new strategy is required.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, geoffbezoz said:

Who do you suggest would have such a distaste for human life that thousands , if not millions of civilians would be killed due to collateral damage if this came to pass ? Who indeed would have the air power to undertake it ? In fact is there a country that has a track record of bombing the crap out of South East Asian coutries, to no avail, that would even contemplate it again ?  But Thailand, Myanmar, China and Laos, the subject of the OP are not the only countries involved/profiting/condoning/facilitating the drugs trade. What about Afghanisatsn ? That has had the shit bombed out of it firstly by the Soviets then the US and opium production has now reached record levels. What about South American Countries Columbia for instance ?

 

Perhaps you consider bombing and killing half the entire world is a good idea perhaps ?

You can take it as a metaphor for the urgent need for extreme action that is clearly required. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...