Jump to content

Border guards waiting for 65 year old pensioner at Nong Khai


webfact

Recommended Posts

Border guards waiting for 65 year old pensioner at Nong Khai

 

6pm.jpg

 

Naew Na reported that a 65 year old man was arrested by immigration officers at the border. 

 

An informant had told the police that Smith Pothisakha, who lives in Roi-Et was on his way. 

 

Smith was named in a Nakorn Panom warrant issued on May 13th 2019. He is wanted for fraud under false pretenses. 

 

Smith - whose nationality was not given in the report - was taken to Nakorn Panom to face the charges. 

 

Naew Na said that he had been trying to get across the border. 

 

Source: Naew Na

 

 

thai+visa_news.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-07-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, webfact said:

Smith Pothisakha

Never seen or heard of a name like that before must be surname first ? Was it his wife/girlfriend who told immigration he was coming back wouldn't be the first time .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Smith was named in a Nakorn Panom warrant issued on May 13th 2019. He is wanted for fraud under false pretenses. 

He was fraudulently fraudulent ? Makes no sense (I know better not say that) .  It is a double negative that cancels itself out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, keith101 said:

Never seen or heard of a name like that before must be surname first ?

Pothisaka is found as a Thai family name (found a beautiful holder on the net :biggrin:).

In some countries it's possible to adopt both names after marriage.

 

But who was the "informant"?

Bet is was a bar-stool compatriot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, yellowboat said:

He was fraudulently fraudulent ? Makes no sense (I know better not say that) .  It is a double negative that cancels itself out.   

"It is a double negative that cancels itself out."  If you are going to be so pedantic, why say cancels itself out ? Wouldn't just the word cancel suffice ?  It is a double negative that cancels itself. I may stand to be corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, malt25 said:

"It is a double negative that cancels itself out."  If you are going to be so pedantic, why say cancels itself out ? Wouldn't just the word cancel suffice ?  It is a double negative that cancels itself. I may stand to be corrected.

Or stand to be correctly corrected?  Is it that important?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...