US national accused of sex crimes against minor

[geovalin]

A US national was charged by Siem Reap Provincial Court on Thursday over allegations of sexual crimes against a minor. In a statement on Saturday, Action Pour Les Enfants said the suspect is 56-years-old and hails from Massachusetts. It said the suspect was charged with purchasing child prostitution, child pornography and rape under the Law on Suppression of Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation.

 

Brigadier General Duong Thavary, deputy chief of provincial police in charge of the anti-human trafficking and juvenile protection department, yesterday said John Patrick Reidy was arrested by police in Siem Reap city on Wednesday at his rental home in Svay Dangkum commune after the victim’s parent filed a complaint.

 

“The suspect acknowledged that he had sex with the victim, but he said the victim told him he was 18, not 16,” she said. “They had sexual encounters multiple times since the beginning of this year. We arrested him based on the victim’s family complaint.” According to APLE, the suspect was arrested after it reported its suspicion.

 

read more https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50626313/us-national-accused-of-sex-crimes-against-minor/

[Geoffggi]

Do what ever you want with him if proven guilty, no-one will complain.

[Pique Dard]

"Action pour les enfants" is an ong doing a great job in cambodia by making life tough for pedophiles. i've seen a coverage  about their work.

[OneMoreFarang]

16? Is that the priority now?

Lots of 16 year old teenagers have sex, and their bodies are ready for sex.

Should they be protected? Yes! Should they be first priority? I don't think so.

I think pedophiles who abuse young children, sometime younger than 10 years old, should be the highest priority. 10 year old children definitely don't have sex in mind and they definitely don't agree to be abused.

I guess there are still enough pedophiles out there who abuse young children. They should be top priority!

[rosst]

33 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

16? Is that the priority now?

Lots of 16 year old teenagers have sex, and their bodies are ready for sex.

Should they be protected? Yes! Should they be first priority? I don't think so.

I think pedophiles who abuse young children, sometime younger than 10 years old, should be the highest priority. 10 year old children definitely don't have sex in mind and they definitely don't agree to be abused.

I guess there are still enough pedophiles out there who abuse young children. They should be top priority!

I am not denying that some 16 year olds are physically ready for sexual experience but are not mentally ready. 

We are unable to determine who can and who can't so we have the law which mandates at what age the person can legally make a decision on whether they wish to have a sexual experience. 

I think your post indicates you believe otherwise? 

He is guilty of rape of a minor, lock him up in a Cambodian prison and feed him rice and fish heads till he dies. 

[OneMoreFarang]

1 minute ago, rosst said:

I am not denying that some 16 year olds are physically ready for sexual experience but are not mentally ready. 

We are unable to determine who can and who can't so we have the law which mandates at what age the person can legally make a decision on whether they wish to have a sexual experience. 

I think your post indicates you believe otherwise? 

He is guilty of rape of a minor, lock him up in a Cambodian prison and feed him rice and fish heads till he dies. 

The age of consent is different all over the world. As far as I remember 15 or 16 is in the normal range in many countries.

 

I think anybody who does something against the law should be punished. And the police should enforce the laws.

But what is worse: Someone who has sex with a 16 year old without forcing that person into sex or someone raping a 5 year or 10 year old child? I think we all agree what is worse. And for that reason I think the authorities, NGO, and others should concentrate on the real bad cases first. 

[BritManToo]

25 minutes ago, rosst said:

I am not denying that some 16 year olds are physically ready for sexual experience but are not mentally ready. 

Nobody really cares what you think, each country has it's own law, obey of face punishment.

Age of consent in Cambodia appears to be 15, so I'm not sure what's happening here.

[Yinn]

8 hours ago, Geoffggi said:

Do what ever you want with him if proven guilty, no-one will complain.

 

4 hours ago, Pique Dard said:

"Action pour les enfants" is an ong doing a great job in cambodia by making life tough for pedophiles. i've seen a coverage  about their work.

 

3 hours ago, rosst said:

I am not denying that some 16 year olds are physically ready for sexual experience but are not mentally ready. 

We are unable to determine who can and who can't so we have the law which mandates at what age the person can legally make a decision on whether they wish to have a sexual experience. 

I think your post indicates you believe otherwise? 

He is guilty of rape of a minor, lock him up in a Cambodian prison and feed him rice and fish heads till he dies. 

 

4 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

16? Is that the priority now?

Lots of 16 year old teenagers have sex, and their bodies are ready for sex.

Should they be protected? Yes! Should they be first priority? I don't think so.

I think pedophiles who abuse young children, sometime younger than 10 years old, should be the highest priority. 10 year old children definitely don't have sex in mind and they definitely don't agree to be abused.

I guess there are still enough pedophiles out there who abuse young children. They should be top priority!

 

Onemorefarang Posted May 26 Happiness when marrying a much younger woman

I think more important than the age difference is the age of the girl/woman when you start the relation.

My gf was 16 when I met her. I was her first boyfriend ever.

And I didn't have a bad conscience because she told me she was 18. I only found out 2 years later when she was really 18

 

14 hours ago, geovalin said:

“The suspect acknowledged that he had sex with the victim, but he said the victim told him he was 18, not 16,”

 

Sound the same? Or not?

 

[timendres]

5 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Nobody really cares what you think, each country has it's own law, obey of face punishment.

Age of consent in Cambodia appears to be 15, so I'm not sure what's happening here.

It may be similar to Thailand. Here, the age of consent is below 18 within certain guidelines. But for foreigners it is absolutely 18. A reasonable law, given the potential abuse the lower age invites, while still recognizing local mores.

[RichardColeman]

Wonder what they would do if you went on holiday with your 16 year old g/f from the uk where sex at 16 is legal ? You could even be in a situation where you cannot have sex with your wife !

[OneMoreFarang]

8 hours ago, Yinn said:

Onemorefarang Posted May 26 Happiness when marrying a much younger woman

I think more important than the age difference is the age of the girl/woman when you start the relation.

My gf was 16 when I met her. I was her first boyfriend ever.

And I didn't have a bad conscience because she told me she was 18. I only found out 2 years later when she was really 18

 

Sound the same? Or not?

 

And what's your point?

In my case that was a long time ago. At that time 16 year old girls were working in many bars in Thailand. And nobody cared.

 

I don't know how the situation is in Cambodia. Are they very strict with enforcing their laws?

 

Sometimes it seems some NGOs and other groups do everything so it appears they do something. Find the real pedophiles who abuse small children and make sure they are prosecuted. And don't worry too much if some teenagers have sex. They always had sex and will always have sex. That's what teenagers do.

 

I guess next some saviors will run around in Thailand telling people prostitution is illegal and everybody involved should go to jail.

[Yinn]

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And what's your point?

In my case that was a long time ago. At that time 16 year old girls were working in many bars in Thailand. And nobody cared.

 

I don't know how the situation is in Cambodia. Are they very strict with enforcing their laws?

 

Sometimes it seems some NGOs and other groups do everything so it appears they do something. Find the real pedophiles who abuse small children and make sure they are prosecuted. And don't worry too much if some teenagers have sex. They always had sex and will always have sex. That's what teenagers do.

 

I guess next some saviors will run around in Thailand telling people prostitution is illegal and everybody involved should go to jail.

First point.

Your first post, you defend the guy, or yourself?

[Yinn]

2 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And what's your point?

 

 

I guess next some saviors will run around in Thailand telling people prostitution is illegal and everybody involved should go to jail.

Second point. Prostitution with kids is illegal. I think good law. Do you?

[OneMoreFarang]

21 minutes ago, Yinn said:

Second point. Prostitution with kids is illegal. I think good law. Do you?

I also think it's a good law and I think people who mess around with kids should go to jail.

 

But now the question is the definition of "kids". I think we agree that any children before the puberty should be protected by law. They are not interested in sex and anybody who abuses them is guilty.

 

But how about teenagers, i.e. 17 year old girls. How many of them have sex? It seems many, probably the majority of them. And most of the time they have sex with boys of a similar age or maybe a little older. So do you think it should be a crime if a 22 year old boy has sex with a 17 year old girl? I don't think so! And how about if the guy is 30? Or 40? I don't see the problem as long as they both want it.

 

And in my personal experience with my at that time 16 year old gf: She worked in a bar because her older step-sister thought that is a good idea. I met her there and I fell in love with her and I asked her to come and live with me. She liked the idea and she still lives with me. And she has no contact to the big step-sister anymore.

Now what do you think would have happened if she would not have come to stay with me? Maybe a couple of more years in the bar and a couple of hundred guys later?

Or should I have informed the police and maybe they would have brought her into a orphanage? Does that sound like a good idea?

 

These days I talk very little to teenage girls. But from time to time I talk to girls in bars who started to work there when they were younger than 18. And nobody forced them to do that. And even if they work in a bar nobody forces them to go with customers (at least not in the bars where I go). 

Would teenagers work in bars in a perfect world? No. But our world is not perfect and sometimes the bar is the better alternative.

I know a girl who worked with 15 as a bartender and as far as I know she didn't go with any customers. The alternative for her was to stay with her mother and her stepfather who was a little too interested in her. I know the parents. I think she was a lot better off in the bar without her stepfather. Sometime there are no good alternatives. 

 

And coming back to the case with started this thread: It seems the guy had sex with a 16 year old girl and it seems he didn't force her to have sex. It seems the parents complained and not the girl. And we don't know why the parents complained. Did they love their daughter and wanted to protect her? Or did they hope to get a big payment from the guy or maybe "support" from the NGO? It seems money if often the motivation and not protecting the children... 

[OneMoreFarang]

44 minutes ago, Yinn said:

Second point. Prostitution with kids is illegal. I think good law. Do you?

And in Thailand any prostitution is illegal. Will you go to the police and tell them about all the bars with all the prostitutes? It seems somehow the police didn't notice them.

[spidermike007]

As an American overseas, one has to be very, very careful in this regard. The US is the most overzealous government in the world, when it comes to the prosecution of statutory crimes against its citizens. It goes back to the prudishness, and fake puritanism, prevalent within US culture. America is a very confused and disturbed nation, when it comes to sex. I am not advocating for underage sex. Quite the opposite. I despise that practice. Women 18 years and older are plenty hot for any man, unless he is mentally bent. Preying on children is horrific. I am railing against an overly intrusive government, and it's vast over reach. Thailand cooperates with this, on every level. Except in the initial stages, where it may be possible to buy your way out, if she is 17. 16 and under. Little chance. 

 

I am informed by friends in law enforcement, that if an American is caught with a woman anywhere in the world (regardless of local laws), with a woman 16 or under, they will dispatch an official, who will fly to Bangkok, pick him up, escort him back to Washington in handcuffs, where he will face statutory rape charges. Very little evidence is required for a prosecution. An audio tape of the girl involved, and a copy of her ID is enough, for a prosecution. The US government will throw up to $10,000,000 at the case, to get a conviction. So, unless you have $5 million to spend on attorneys, you will serve 10 years in a federal prison, then you will be on the sex offender list for the rest of your life. And from what I hear, spending time in a federal prison on statutory rape charges is not a good way to make friends there. 

[Berkshire]

16 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

16? Is that the priority now?

Lots of 16 year old teenagers have sex, and their bodies are ready for sex.

Should they be protected? Yes! Should they be first priority? I don't think so.

I think pedophiles who abuse young children, sometime younger than 10 years old, should be the highest priority. 10 year old children definitely don't have sex in mind and they definitely don't agree to be abused.

I guess there are still enough pedophiles out there who abuse young children. They should be top priority!

Priority?  How about just nail them all.  The authorities also found some other incriminating evidence at the guy's apartment....

 

[“During the initial search of the two mobile phones, investigators found naked photographs of boys, including photographs of the child who disclosed the sexual abuse,”]

 

And the suspect was already living with another guy....

 

[the suspect was living with a Cambodian male adult who confirmed the two were in a romantic relationship.]

 

I'm pretty sure this wasn't the suspect's first time with a child. 

 

 

[Yinn]

21 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

 

But how about teenagers, i.e. 17 year old girls. How many of them have sex? It seems many, probably the majority of them. And most of the time they have sex with boys of a similar age or maybe a little older. So do you think it should be a crime if a 22 year old boy has sex with a 17 year old girl? I don't think so! And how about if the guy is 30? Or 40? I don't see the problem as long as they both want it.

Yes, age consent is 16. When they make the law they know 16 old girls some like sex. 

No problem up to 20 because about the same age. 20-30 not sure, maybe some ok if she really love and have good brain. Up to the situation. 

 

But you believe this 16 year old “want it” with 56 year old Grandpa Farang? Of course not.

 

Big different. 

[Yinn]

31 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And in Thailand any prostitution is illegal. 

Not really. 

But not with children. 

I not sure but think age 20 up is not illegal.

 

[OneMoreFarang]

52 minutes ago, Yinn said:

Not really. 

But not with children. 

I not sure but think age 20 up is not illegal.

So you write in a Thai forum about illegal prostitution and you don't even know that prostitution is illegal in Thailand?

Maybe it would help if you inform yourself a little.

 

From Wikipedia: Prostitution in Thailand

"Prostitution has been common in Thailand for centuries. During the Ayutthaya Kingdom (1351–1767), prostitution was legal and taxed,[1]:2 and the state ran brothels.[2] Since 1960, prostitution in Thailand has been de jure illegal"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand

 

And maybe also have a look at this:

Ages of consent in Asia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia

Cambodia: 15 

Thailand: 15, protections apply until 18 

 

[from the home of CC]

13 hours ago, Yinn said:

 

 

 

 

Onemorefarang Posted May 26 Happiness when marrying a much younger woman

I think more important than the age difference is the age of the girl/woman when you start the relation.

My gf was 16 when I met her. I was her first boyfriend ever.

And I didn't have a bad conscience because she told me she was 18. I only found out 2 years later when she was really 18

 

 

Sound the same? Or not?

 

oh oh, busted! 

[from the home of CC]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

As an American overseas, one has to be very, very careful in this regard. The US is the most overzealous government in the world, when it comes to the prosecution of statutory crimes against its citizens. It goes back to the prudishness, and fake puritanism, prevalent within US culture. America is a very confused and disturbed nation, when it comes to sex. I am not advocating for underage sex. Quite the opposite. I despise that practice. Women 18 years and older are plenty hot for any man, unless he is mentally bent. Preying on children is horrific. I am railing against an overly intrusive government, and it's vast over reach. Thailand cooperates with this, on every level. Except in the initial stages, where it may be possible to buy your way out, if she is 17. 16 and under. Little chance. 

 

I am informed by friends in law enforcement, that if an American is caught with a woman anywhere in the world (regardless of local laws), with a woman 16 or under, they will dispatch an official, who will fly to Bangkok, pick him up, escort him back to Washington in handcuffs, where he will face statutory rape charges. Very little evidence is required for a prosecution. An audio tape of the girl involved, and a copy of her ID is enough, for a prosecution. The US government will throw up to $10,000,000 at the case, to get a conviction. So, unless you have $5 million to spend on attorneys, you will serve 10 years in a federal prison, then you will be on the sex offender list for the rest of your life. And from what I hear, spending time in a federal prison on statutory rape charges is not a good way to make friends there. 

Canada will also prosecute for these sex crimes - I'm all for it.

[OneMoreFarang]

11 minutes ago, from the home of CC said:

oh oh, busted! 

Really?

Look at the age of consent law. It's 15 (I thought 16) in Thailand.

And her family didn't complain. And she is still with me, many years later.

So what is your problem?

I am not American and I don't plan to ever visit that strange country.

[Yinn]

3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

So you write in a Thai forum about illegal prostitution and you don't even know that prostitution is illegal in Thailand?

Maybe it would help if you inform yourself a little.

 

From Wikipedia: Prostitution in Thailand

"Prostitution has been common in Thailand for centuries. During the Ayutthaya Kingdom (1351–1767), prostitution was legal and taxed,[1]:2 and the state ran brothels.[2] Since 1960, prostitution in Thailand has been de jure illegal"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand

 

And maybe also have a look at this:

Ages of consent in Asia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia

Cambodia: 15 

Thailand: 15, protections apply until 18 

 

I think nobody care about 20 year old and up. See it in Patong. Because adult already.

But 16 can not. Same reason 16 year old can not go to pub and drink alcohol. Because still the kid.

 

Not just me who think that. The police do also.

big difference prostitution and child prostitution.

[OneMoreFarang]

29 minutes ago, Yinn said:

I think nobody care about 20 year old and up. See it in Patong. Because adult already.

But 16 can not. Same reason 16 year old can not go to pub and drink alcohol. Because still the kid.

 

Not just me who think that. The police do also.

big difference prostitution and child prostitution.

So it seems you don't want that all laws are enforced. The Thai law makes prostitution illegal, with 16, 20, 30, 40, any age.

Personally you think 20 is ok but 16 is not ok. So is 18 ok or a little ok or what?

I think in reality some teenagers are active earlier and some later. Many 16 year old girls are not innocent kids anymore.

[Yinn]

43 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

So it seems you don't want that all laws are enforced. The Thai law makes prostitution illegal, with 16, 20, 30, 40, any age.

Not really, like I earlier said...

The age of consent in Thailand is 15 regardless of gender or sexual orientation, as specified by article 279 of the Thai Criminal Code. The current legislation applies to all regardless of gender or sexual orientation.

However, parts of the Prevention and Suppression of Prostitution Act, which disallow any sexual contact with prostitutes under the age of 18, are widely interpreted by some local authorities to cover sexual acts classed as "obscenity for personal gratification". Also, from the Penal Code Amendment Actof 1997 Section 283bis, having sex with an adolescent under 18 is a compoundable offense even with the consent of that person. The parent or the adolescent may file charges against the other side if they later regret their own action. This ostensibly makes the Thai unfettered age of consent 18.

A high-profile example of this application of the law was a statutory rape charge filed against the lead singer of the Thai band Big Ass for allegedly having had sex with a (then) 16-year-old girl.

 

So a 16 year old “bargirl” is not ok. Sure.

 

43 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Personally you think 20 is ok but 16 is not ok. So is 18 ok or a little ok or what?

No, 18 is too young to be a sex worker. Brain not develop enough to make decision. Under 18 easy for someone to bully.

That my opinion. And the law. 

You disagree.

 

 

43 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I think in reality some teenagers are active earlier and some later. Many 16 year old girls are not innocent kids anymore.

You said your 16 year old never had a boyfriend before. Or not?

[marcusarelus]

55 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

So it seems you don't want that all laws are enforced. The Thai law makes prostitution illegal, with 16, 20, 30, 40, any age.

Personally you think 20 is ok but 16 is not ok. So is 18 ok or a little ok or what?

I think in reality some teenagers are active earlier and some later. Many 16 year old girls are not innocent kids anymore.

The Penal Code Amendment Act (No. 14), B.E. 2540 (1997)[11] does not explicitly state that prostitution in Thailand is illegal.  If you think it is please provide link.  

[Yinn]

8 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

As an American overseas, one has to be very, very careful in this regard. The US is the most overzealous government in the world, when it comes to the prosecution of statutory crimes against its citizens. It goes back to the prudishness, and fake puritanism, prevalent within US culture. America is a very confused and disturbed nation, when it comes to sex. I am not advocating for underage sex. Quite the opposite. I despise that practice. Women 18 years and older are plenty hot for any man, unless he is mentally bent. Preying on children is horrific. I am railing against an overly intrusive government, and it's vast over reach. Thailand cooperates with this, on every level. Except in the initial stages, where it may be possible to buy your way out, if she is 17. 16 and under. Little chance. 

 

I am informed by friends in law enforcement, that if an American is caught with a woman anywhere in the world (regardless of local laws), with a woman 16 or under, they will dispatch an official, who will fly to Bangkok, pick him up, escort him back to Washington in handcuffs, where he will face statutory rape charges. Very little evidence is required for a prosecution. An audio tape of the girl involved, and a copy of her ID is enough, for a prosecution. The US government will throw up to $10,000,000 at the case, to get a conviction. So, unless you have $5 million to spend on attorneys, you will serve 10 years in a federal prison, then you will be on the sex offender list for the rest of your life. And from what I hear, spending time in a federal prison on statutory rape charges is not a good way to make friends there. 

Increasingly, the Thai government—with the assistance of the FBI and other partners—has taken significant steps to address the sexual exploitation of children and to focus more attention on victims, whose interests in the past have sometimes been overlooked. 

 

Davies explained that trafficking is a “huge problem in Thailand, as it is in many countries.” But the Thai government has shown a “new eagerness” to address the problem and to seek help from the United States, the ambassador said. “That is terrific, because we’ve got the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the State Department’s expertise and resources that we can bring to bear.”

 

 

“We see a large number of travelers from the U.S. and other countries coming here to commit acts against children,” said Special Agent John Schachnovsky, head of the FBI’s legal attaché office in Bangkok. “To travel from the U.S. to any foreign country and engage in sex with a minor is against the law.”

 

“Trafficking is a serious crime,” he said. “It is a crime against human dignity, but when they do this to our children, it is even worse.” The general explained that there is a “clear national agenda” in Thailand to address these issues and to assist young people who are sexually exploited by Thai citizens as well as foreign visitors.

 

 

Child sex tourism describes the act of traveling to another country to engage in illegal sexual conduct with children. It’s a growing problem thanks to the ease of international travel and the free exchange of information online regarding how and where to find child victims overseas. Children from poor and developing countries are often seen as easy targets by American sexual predators.

 

[Yinn]

 

On 7/23/2019 at 7:51 PM, BritManToo said:

 I'm not sure what's happening here.

This 

 

On 7/23/2019 at 8:54 AM, geovalin said:

purchasing child prostitution, child pornography and rape

 

[Yinn]

On 7/23/2019 at 6:47 PM, OneMoreFarang said:

On 7/23/2019 at 11:13 PM, Yinn said:

 

 

 

My gf was 16 when I met her. I was her first boyfriend ever.

And I didn't have a bad conscience because she told me she was 18.

 

Should they be protected? Yes

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

I also think it's a good law and I think people who mess around with kids should go to jail.

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

 

 

But how about teenagers, i.e. 17 year old girls. How many of them have sex? It seems many, probably the majority of them.

 

But not with sex tourist who “pay” for them in the bar. Very different.

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

 I don't see the problem as long as they both want it.

 

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

And in my personal experience with my at that time 16 year old gf: She worked in a bar

 

 

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Or should I have informed the police and maybe they would have brought her into a orphanage? Does that sound like a good idea?

So you “adoption” her? No, have sex with her.

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

. 

Would teenagers work in bars in a perfect world? No. But our world is not perfect and sometimes the bar is the better alternative.

Bar is better alternative for 16 year sell body to foreign sex tourist than what? 

 

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

I know a girl who worked with 15 as a bartender and as far as I know she didn't go with any customers. The alternative for her was to stay with her mother and her stepfather who was a little too interested in her. I know the parents. I think she was a lot better off in the bar without her stepfather. Sometime there are no good alternatives. 

Or get another job? Like normal people do. You crazy if you think that is good.

 

On 7/24/2019 at 10:48 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

 

And coming back to the case with started this thread: It seems the guy had sex with a 16 year old girl and it seems he didn't force her to have sex. It seems the parents complained and not the girl. And we don't know why the parents complained. Did they love their daughter and wanted to protect her? Or did they hope to get a big payment from the guy or maybe "support" from the NGO? It seems money if often the motivation and not protecting the children... 

Yeah, great guy. In the jail. Good.

 

 

your story start that you think it bad. Say 16 year old should be protection.

you say you didn’t feel bad because you “didn’t know” she was 16.

 

but now you say it ok, a good alternative. Should be ok.

 

so what you really believe? Is ok? Should have protection? Or not? 

I also don’t believe you not know for two years. Unbelievable.

you also say you “ask her parents”. They “ok”. So you know she to young right?

 

Your photo you look about 55 year old up? Correct?

You think normal for old man to “love” the kid year 3 of high school? Or not?