Jump to content

Tobacco giant pushing for a ‘smoke-free’ future


webfact

Recommended Posts

Tobacco giant pushing for a ‘smoke-free’ future

By Jintana Panyaarvudh
The Nation 

 

800_88a34e1dd0b44a1.jpg?v=1563879580

Gerald Margolis, managing director of Philip Morris Thailand.

 

Leading cigarette importer Philip Morris Trading (Thailand) is calling on the new government and policymakers to start talking with the tobacco industry, so both sides can work on finding constructive solutions to reduce harm caused by smoking.

 

This suggestion came shortly after the government announced its new Cabinet, which the tobacco giant hopes will consider innovative “smoke-free products” for smokers, who otherwise would continue smoking, in its determination to build a smoke-free society. 

 

Thailand has banned the import, sale and servicing of e-cigarettes since 2014, with violators facing arrest and a jail sentence. Philip Morris’s smoke-free products could also be included in this banned category.

 

Gerald Margolis, managing director of Philip Morris Thailand, said the company wanted to call on the government to make way for a discussion that is backed by findings about the impact of smoking and encourage policymakers to review scientific evidence indicating that smoke-free products are a safer alternative to cigarettes and could significantly reduce risks once smokers switch completely to e-cigarettes. 

 

“With current developments in technology and science, it’s a great opportunity that we could get away from some ideological dialogues that we have had in the past and have more talks about fact and science instead to help create a smoke-free future in Thailand,” said Margolis during a group interview on Monday. 

 

Philip Morris International, along with its sister organisation in Thailand, is working to create a smoke-free environment by planning to completely discontinue the production and distribution of combustible cigarettes and replace it with smoke-free products as soon as possible, according to Margolis.

 

Since 2008, Philip Morris has invested more than Bt1.8 trillion to develop smoke-free products or “heat-not-burn” cigarettes that remain well below the point of combustion when lit.

 

Scientific research has found that the primary source of harm from smoking comes from harmful chemicals in the smoke from a burning cigarette, not the nicotine that is consumed. 

 

6%20(1).JPG

Aerosol from Philip Morris smoke-free product, left and centre, versus tar from smoke from a cigarette, right.

 

Hence, Philip Morris developed smoke-free cigarettes under the idea that if the combustion process is eliminated, then the risks can be reduced. 

 

“If you smoke, the best thing to do is to quit. If you don’t smoke you should not start. And of course if you don’t quit, the better alternative will be to switch to better alternatives [that are less harmful],” he said, emphasising the company’s push for a smoke-free future. 

 

In the past, the tobacco firm held regular discussions with the Commerce Ministry and Excise Department to share its scientific results and studies on alternative products, but it never held face-to-face meetings with public health agencies. 

 

Margolis said moves to cut down on tobacco-related harm and promote smoke-free products was mostly successful in countries where scientific findings were shared with and embraced by public health agencies, and companies like Philip Morris were allowed to share related information with consumers so they could learn about the products and their benefits. 

 

For instance, Public Health England launched a campaign telling smokers in the UK that vaping is not as harmful as smoking, while New Zealand government launched a website educating people on e-cigarettes and a campaign encouraging smokers to switch to vaping. 

During the interview, Margolis also presented independent findings from some international health organisations which found that smoke-free products can significantly reduce health risks.

 

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration confirmed that the Philip Morris “heat-not-burn” cigarettes were appropriate for the protection of public health and has authorised its sale in the United States. 

 

Ban making little difference

 

Margolis said the nearly 11 million smokers in Thailand deserve a legitimate right to access these smoke-free products so we can make every day a “no-smoking day”.

 

He also pointed out that despite strict measures, the number of smokers has hardly changed – in 2015 it was 19.9 per cent, which dropped to just 19.1 per cent in 2017.

 

Under the National Tobacco Control Plan, Thailand aims to reduce the number of smokers to 16.7 per cent within this year. 

 

Margolis said he really hopes the new government will review its ban on e-cigarettes and other alternative products, citing new Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s progressive election campaign to promote cannabis farming or a “cannabis liberalisation policy”. 

“It would be very ironic if you can smoke marijuana, but smokers are given no access to other alternatives to cigarettes,” Margolis said. 

 

5%20(1).jpg

Since 2008, Philip Morris has invested more than Bt1.8 trillion to develop smoke-free products

 

In a move towards lifting a ban on e-cigarettes and legalising it as a “controlled” instead of “banned” substance, the Commerce Ministry’s Department of Foreign Trade late last year tasked the Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Centre with studying legal hurdles affecting the implementation of the ban. 

 

Opponents, especially officials from the Public Health Ministry, insist that e-cigarettes remain prohibited, saying the devices are hazardous to health and could encourage young people to start smoking.

 

Margolis, however, defended this by saying cigarette alternatives were specifically designed for adult smokers, adding that the design, flavour and packaging are in no way attractive to youth, non-smokers or even former smokers. 

 

Pre- and post-market studies on all of Philip Morris’s alternative cigarettes being sold in 48 countries also found that the youth are not attracted to these products.

 

He said a study conducted by a third party in Japan, where Philip Morris’s smoke-free products can be sold, showed that actual usage of the product by young people was less than 0.1 per cent. 

 

“At Philip Morris, we are strongly against young people having access to any tobacco products, be it cigarettes or heat-not-burn cigarettes or e-cigarettes. Because of that, we advocate, obey and usually go beyond the wall in terms of marketing code. And for this new category, it’s no different,” he said.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30373496

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-07-24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite ridiculous.

I cant see the logic of banning the use of something nearly everywhere,

(even making you liable for damages for use in your own residence)

and allowing the company shelf space for its products in thousands of 7/11's.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmm.?? run that by me, a huge company, selling cigs, calling for smoke free, environment. they only want to get a bigger foothold in Thailand, every Thai and his dog smokes  is my observation , i use to see the workers coming down soi 4 at 9pm, from the factory, those old buses churning more black smoke than a million  smokers, ha ha..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All for the benifit of the people of course ensuring a long healthy life. It amazes me how a tobacco

companies can be so benevolent even at the expense of their bottom line to make sure the world's population's good health takes precedent. 

Or is this wrong thinking on my part? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand has banned the import, sale and servicing of e-cigarettes since 2014, with violators facing arrest and a jail sentence. Philip Morris’s smoke-free products could also be included in this banned category.

So can we assume that Thailand authorities actually want their citizens who are nicotine addicts (call them what they are) to smoke the nastiest, most vile and filthy products that research shows will eventually cause long-term health problems leading to death and costing the Thai national health services billions of Thai baht a year?  

 

Somebody's monopoly has their hooks buried talon-deep into the fabric of Thai government perhaps?  Ain't greed a wonderful thing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NCC1701A said:

"and then I said 'Smoke free future!' God I love this job. Sure beats selling crack and pimping out whores."

 

 

imageprjhboxy.php.jpg

But, if the world's governments got behind selling crack and pimping whores, then Madison Avenue would have it all dressed up and selling awareness and cognition enhancing products that benefit human quality of life and supplying the lonely and disenfranchised with loving companionship at a price.  Skyscrapers would house their corporate offices in major urban centers globally, executive and sales staff would wear three-piece Armani silk suits and take home 6 and 7 figure salaries, government official, non-profits, and NGOs would bank philanthropic and campaign contributions, and the world would burn just a little bit brighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mercman24 said:

mmm.?? run that by me, a huge company, selling cigs, calling for smoke free, environment. they only want to get a bigger foothold in Thailand, every Thai and his dog smokes  is my observation , i use to see the workers coming down soi 4 at 9pm, from the factory, those old buses churning more black smoke than a million  smokers, ha ha..

They want to pimp "Clean", "Healthy", "Smoke-Free", "Toxin-Free", nicotine-delivery systems that will addict a whole new generation to a drug that has no other function then to - addict.  Nothing but a world full of "good, clean, healthy" addicts who will pour money into their companies for generations on end.  
<Pan camera view out and back in on athlete completing a grueling Iron-Man competition - drinks a bottle of Brand XYZ Natural Spring Water then takes a lungful of Brand XYZ's "good, clean, healthy" vaporized SmokeLessTM nicotine.  Thumbs up! Smiles for the camera!>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connda said:

So can we assume that Thailand authorities actually want their citizens who are nicotine addicts (call them what they are) to smoke the nastiest, most vile and filthy products that research shows will eventually cause long-term health problems leading to death and costing the Thai national health services billions of Thai baht a year?  

 

Somebody's monopoly has their hooks buried talon-deep into the fabric of Thai government perhaps?  Ain't greed a wonderful thing? 

No! That couldn't be right or even feasible, the government wouldn't allow it - you know how important life is to the Thai government. That's not counting the road deaths, murders, drugs, etc. because these aren't really important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaping is not without risk. 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/better-cigarettes-vaping-comes-its-own-set-health-risks-ncna819716

 

The habit may be less unhealthy than smoking conventional cigarettes, but it's too early to say. As with many other products - 5G is one of the latest examples - humans are being used as guinea pigs for long-term testing that should have been done before the product's release.

 

We should never be expected to pick up the tab - in the form of damaged health - for an industry's parsimony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is good to see rational, informed discussion on the legal situation around vaping in Thailand. "Think of the children" seems to be the final defence of the status quo, an emotive argument often presented in popular culture as an impediment to rationality and common sense:

 

giphy.gifgiphy.gif

 

It is time to legislate to allow for less harmful forms of nicotine delivery systems. The potential health benefits, tax revenue and knock on effects on tourist numbers are clear to anyone who has studied the facts.

 

Hopefully Phillip Morris valid and well researched economic and scientific arguments can help sway the misinformed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...