Jump to content

Britain ready and willing to do a Brexit deal - government source


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Britain ready and willing to do a Brexit deal - government source

 

2323.JPG

FILE PHOTO: British Union Jack flags are seen on the desks of Members of the Brexit Party during a debate on the last European summit, at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, July 4, 2019. REUTERS/Vincent Kessler

 

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain is “ready and willing” to do a Brexit deal with the European Union, a senior government source said on Tuesday, after a newspaper reported that Prime Minister Boris Johnson was aiming for a no-deal Brexit.

 

“We want a deal. It’s sad that they don’t want to negotiate with us,” the source said on condition of anonymity.

 

“The fact that the Withdrawal Agreement has been rejected by large margins by the House of Commons on three occasions means that, if there’s going to be a deal, they have to be prepared to renegotiate. We’re ready and willing to do so.”

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-08-06
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

(The Americans are already weigh up their chances to become in strongest negotiation position....)

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/06/brexit-clinton-treasury-secretary-larry-summers-dismisses-desperate-uk-hopes-of-us-trade-deal

UK too desperate to secure US trade deal, says Clinton's treasury secretary

Britain in weak negotiating position despite Trump’s warm words, says Larry Summers

 

The former US treasury secretary Larry Summers has said he does not believe that a “desperate” UK would manage to secure a post-Brexit trade deal with Washington, as Dominic Raab, the new foreign secretary, heads to the US to scope out the potential for such an agreement.

 

Summers, who was a senior official under Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, said the UK was in a weak position when it came to negotiating with trade partners.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday: “Britain has no leverage, Britain is desperate … it needs an agreement very soon. When you have a desperate partner, that’s when you strike the hardest bargain.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they were always going to fight a rear guard action as they cant stand the loss of payments to keep their gravey train on the rails but the buffers are on their way causing their collapse just like the 3rd reich merkel and the 4th reich will collapse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, david555 said:

(The Americans are already weigh up their chances to become in strongest negotiation position....)

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/06/brexit-clinton-treasury-secretary-larry-summers-dismisses-desperate-uk-hopes-of-us-trade-deal

UK too desperate to secure US trade deal, says Clinton's treasury secretary

Britain in weak negotiating position despite Trump’s warm words, says Larry Summers

 

The former US treasury secretary Larry Summers has said he does not believe that a “desperate” UK would manage to secure a post-Brexit trade deal with Washington, as Dominic Raab, the new foreign secretary, heads to the US to scope out the potential for such an agreement.

 

Summers, who was a senior official under Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, said the UK was in a weak position when it came to negotiating with trade partners.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday: “Britain has no leverage, Britain is desperate … it needs an agreement very soon. When you have a desperate partner, that’s when you strike the hardest bargain.”

That the US still considers the UK an "ally" after all that has happened demonstrates the soft spot and sentimental feelings Trump has for Great Britain. He will offer them a fair deal, even though he probably shouldn't. Trump has shown a consistent track record in this regard. UK lucked out in getting somebody of Trump's generation and mindset in the WH at this particular moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Loiner said:


We’re open to a deal. Not a Surrender Treaty to become a vassal state of the Federal States of Europe.

 

Now that Boris has achieved his long term aim I fully expect him to bring back May's deal with a few tweaks here and word changes there whilst claiming it a personal triumph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, david555 said:

Easy … just make a border in the Irish sea and the backstop could be cancelled , easy peasy...

Only someone with absolutely no idea about Northern Irish politics, no idea about the GFA, no idea about the CTA, no idea at all could say that such a ludicrous 'solution' was 'easy peasy!'

 

Why would a constituent part of the UK where the majority of it's citizens wish to remain so accept a border of any kind between it and the rest of the UK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

Only someone with absolutely no idea about Northern Irish politics, no idea about the GFA, no idea about the CTA, no idea at all could say that such a ludicrous 'solution' was 'easy peasy!'

 

Why would a constituent part of the UK where the majority of it's citizens wish to remain so accept a border of any kind between it and the rest of the UK?

Not easy peasy indeed.

 

But to get out of this ever continuing mess, sacrifices will have to be made.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

Only someone with absolutely no idea about Northern Irish politics, no idea about the GFA, no idea about the CTA, no idea at all could say that such a ludicrous 'solution' was 'easy peasy!'

 

Why would a constituent part of the UK where the majority of it's citizens wish to remain so accept a border of any kind between it and the rest of the UK?

Does Gibraltar not have a border with Spain or other British parts in the World ? The Falklands far away …, so why it could not be done to solve the most difficult part ….. unless just unwillingness or stubbornness … so than comes other sides red line appearing too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Not easy peasy indeed.

 

But to get out of this ever continuing mess, sacrifices will have to be made.

 

 

Maybe, but breaking the GFA and the potential return to the Troubles is too great a sacrifice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, david555 said:

Does Gibraltar not have a border with Spain or other British parts in the World ? The Falklands far away …, so why it could not be done to solve the most difficult part ….. unless just unwillingness or stubbornness … so than comes other sides red line appearing too. 

Gibralter does have a land border with Spain; but Spain is not part of the UK.

 

Neither is Gibraltar; it is a British Overseas Territory.

 

There is also no international treaty signed by the UK or anyone else which says there will be no border between Gibraltar and Spain. There is such a treaty about the border between NI and the RoI; the GFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

Gibralter does have a land border with Spain; but Spain is not part of the UK.

 

Neither is Gibraltar; it is a British Overseas Territory.

 

There is also no international treaty signed by the UK or anyone else which says there will be no border between Gibraltar and Spain. There is such a treaty about the border between NI and the RoI; the GFA.

That's how you see it an d how I saw it , different opinions and that's it we don't agree (and that's not a problem for me ) so status quo as it is now , blockage ...T.M had red lines all over.., for the leave camp and others for the remain camp trying to friend both ….. so red lines in overflow …., and bumping against the E.U. own red lines.

All was set out from E.U. side from beginning , they where very clear and consistent.

But all becomes finally to an end very soon U..K. can have his Brexit so all ends fine ….isn't it ?

I have no bad feelings with it , as I expected already 2 months after A50 was given.. no happy divorce as 2 sides to different ….

And besides it is the U.K. who is leaving , not the E.U. leaving U.K. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“The fact that the Withdrawal Agreement has been rejected by large margins by the House of Commons on three occasions means that, if there’s going to be a deal, they have to be prepared to renegotiate. We’re ready and willing to do so.” 

 

No it doesn't.

 

It means that the Commons is well down the road towards rejecting departure altogether.

 

it will be much easier for them to reject a perceived catastrophic "No-Deal" if that is all that is on offer.

 

MP to PA:

 

"What do the polls say, what do they say?

 

Just a question of language and presentation.

 

As it always was.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, usviphotography said:

That the US still considers the UK an "ally" after all that has happened demonstrates the soft spot and sentimental feelings Trump has for Great Britain. He will offer them a fair deal, even though he probably shouldn't. Trump has shown a consistent track record in this regard. UK lucked out in getting somebody of Trump's generation and mindset in the WH at this particular moment. 

Trump is a craven opportunist. Any trade deal offered will be in US favour and will include having to accept US appallingly low food standards and the breakup of the UK's NHS to allow access to the US private health care interests.

As a previous post says, UK is in a weak bargaining spot here and anyone who thinks Trump/US won't want want to maximize leverage in negotiations in a trade deal is living in cloud cuckoo land.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UK wants out of the EU, then they get in line for a trade deal like everyone else.

 

Canada’s deal took nearly decade to nail down. Australia’s negotiations with the EU has been in its ‘final stages’ for about 3 years. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, oldhippy said:

If only the European electorate were given the opportunety to vote: Keep the British on board OR kick them out.

 

I don't think there would have been a narrow margin in the results of that vote.

 

I think if that vote would be held now, it would be close as people are fed up with British entitlement act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oldhippy said:

If only the European electorate were given the opportunety to vote: Keep the British on board OR kick them out.

 

I don't think there would have been a narrow margin in the results of that vote.

 

The European electorate given the opportunity to vote on anything meaningful? ???? I think you're massively overestimating the levels of democracy in the EU.

 

Von Der Leyen will decide. She was 'elected' after days of horse trading resulted in a classic German/French stitch up in the darkened, grubby, smoke filled back rooms of Brussels during which they ensured their chosen individual (an easily manipulated puppet) was the only candidate for the position. This is democracy, EU style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

The European electorate given the opportunity to vote on anything meaningful? ???? I think you're massively overestimating the levels of democracy in the EU.

 

Von Der Leyen will decide. She was 'elected' after days of horse trading resulted in a classic German/French stitch up in the darkened, grubby, smoke filled back rooms of Brussels during which they ensured their chosen individual (an easily manipulated puppet) was the only candidate for the position. This is democracy, EU style.

Boris "nomination" as P.M. looks very much alike ...., even less democratic as it was only 1 group " JRM's backroom way " made it for him …isn't that the same ? 

Don't bother ...I think I know your reply already …

 

(the kettle blaming the cooking pot his bottom is black lol...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, david555 said:

Easy … just make a border in the Irish sea and the backstop could be cancelled , easy peasy...

At some point the english will have to give back the 6 counties that they stole.  Of course, there will be huge resistance to a referendum, but the occupied 6 counties in Ulster will be the hardest hit by the economic vandalism of english no deal insanity, and a referendum will be legally unavoidable when the inevitable numbers demand it.

 

Within 5 - 10 years Scottish independence will follow.  Little england with all its nut job little englanders will be forgotten and all alone in the world.  No more important or significant than Mauritius or Sri Lanka, but very popular with money launderers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 7by7 said:

Only someone with absolutely no idea about Northern Irish politics, no idea about the GFA, no idea about the CTA, no idea at all could say that such a ludicrous 'solution' was 'easy peasy!'

 

Why would a constituent part of the UK where the majority of it's citizens wish to remain so accept a border of any kind between it and the rest of the UK?

The vast majority of Brits don't give a damn about Ireland, North or South, and would prefer to see the whole troublesome island cast adrift in the Atlantic, and sunk.

And, it would be good idea to fill it up with all the radicalised fanatics of all persuasions before cutting the moorings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...