Jump to content

Prayut to dodge House meeting to avoid oath question


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prayut to dodge House meeting to avoid oath question

By The Nation

 

800_06e8ca907f36823.jpg?v=1565761809

Prayut Chan-o-cha

 

Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha said on Wednesday that he would not attend a House meeting to answer a motion regarding errors in his Cabinet’s oath-taking because the issue had been taken up by the Ombudsman Office for an investigation.

 

Prayut said his absence from the afternoon House meeting to answer the motion would not be out of a lack of respect for Parliament.

 

“But the issue has entered its due process. The issue is now in the process of the ombudsmen. It will have its own legal procedures that the government must comply with,” Prayut said.

 

Future Forward Party has submitted a motion demanding the prime minister clarify the issue. The motion was scheduled to be taken up by the House of Representatives on the afternoon of August 14.

 

Future Forward has accused Prayut of violating the constitution by failing to fully state the oath when he and his Cabinet did not commit to protecting and complying with the provisions of the charter. Last week, Prayut issued an apology to his Cabinet for causing the controversy and said he would assume all responsibility, without elaborating.

 

Prayut spoke to reporters as he and his Cabinet members led their spouses on a visit to the Foundation for the Blind in Thailand in Bangkok’s Ratchathevi district at 9.30am.

 

The prime minister and his wife, along with the Cabinet members and their spouses, performed voluntary works to help the blind children at the foundation as an activity under the King-initiated “We Do Good With Heart” voluntary project.

 

The prime minister and entourage donated some learning accessories for the blind to the foundation and took part in making Braille books for blind students at the foundation. They also played games with the blind children, including tug-of-war and football, as well as hosting a lunch for them.

Prayut also joined in singing two songs with the children’s angklung musical band.

 

After singing, Prayut introduced himself and said he and the Cabinet members and their spouses were happy to carry out voluntary activities at the foundation.

 

He said his government would not leave anyone behind and would support all the people. He told the blind children not to feel sorry for their disability because they could do all the things that others can do.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30374735

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-08-14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, webfact said:

“But the issue has entered its due process. The issue is now in the process of the ombudsmen. It will have its own legal procedures that the government must comply with,” Prayut said.

Shouldn't he have been stood down pending the outcome of legal proceedings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“But the issue has entered its due process. The issue is now in the process of the ombudsmen. It will have its own legal procedures that the government must comply with,” Prayut said.

 

 

Slimy politicians in ALL countries always hid behind the law when it benefits them....And totally disregard laws when it benefits them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opposition calls for PM Prayut to submit to questioning

 

ff340b2b8614076db2cfe9832dd187ca.jpg

   

BANGKOK,14th August 2019 (NNT) - The government opposition has resolved to question the Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, concerning his government’s incomplete oath swearing before parliament, after the queries were left unanswered last week.

 

Opposition Whip Chair Suthin Klangsaeng said today that if the Prime Minister does not personally address questions lodged in parliament, the opposition will invoke Article 152 and seek a general non-binding debate covering all acts by the government suspected of being unconstitutional, going beyond the matter of its incomplete oath swearing. The motion may be filed this week, and the opposition will push to have the debate take place before the 2020 budgetary review. Mr. Suthin said the action was to ensure clarity.

 

Future Forward Party MP, Piyabutr Saengkanokkul criticised the Prime Minister for not appearing to field questions, while also reiterating the opposition’s desire to find joint solutions with the government. Mr. Piyabutr added that opposition MPs may switch their questions to deal with the Army Commander addressing foreign media, and economic issues. The House Speaker, Chuan Leekpai, expressed agreement that in principal, the Prime Minister should answer questions put to him personally unless there is due cause for his absence. He explained that questions to do with the oath swearing were left off last week’s agenda due to an excess of matters for discussion.

 

The Prime Minister this morning led members of his cabinet and their spouses on an activity to assist blind people. The volunteer activity was organized by the Foundation for the Blind in Thailand under Royal Patronage. Later, he is scheduled to meet with the Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking.

 

nnt.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is there any need to answer questions from any opposition?The case is already at the Ombudsmans office, and will be dealt with. Better to wait the result of that investigation, and attend to other important matters instead that is not yet on anyone table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

Why is there any need to answer questions from any opposition?The case is already at the Ombudsmans office, and will be dealt with. Better to wait the result of that investigation, and attend to other important matters instead that is not yet on anyone table.

As the Prime Minister he has a responsibility to be open to scrutiny by the opposition, some call it democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

Why is there any need to answer questions from any opposition?

Watching him squirm for me would outweigh any real need,and to question his motives for refusing to utter a vital component of the vow to fully serve the office for which he was "voted".I feel the public has a right to hear his reasons in the interests of transparency  Also because it is a matter of "National Security". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

Why is there any need to answer questions from any opposition?The case is already at the Ombudsmans office, and will be dealt with. Better to wait the result of that investigation, and attend to other important matters instead that is not yet on anyone table.

The naivete is strong with this one!!!

 

We are talking Thailand here where every institution is in the pocket of little Napoleon and his merry band of thieves, give me strength.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On an almost daily basis little P and his cronies show a complete and utter lack of respect for their country and their people

 

The absolute lack of any moral compass or sense of honour or even common or garden decency is telling

 

Unfortunately they are above the law and the only scrutiny the people of Thailand have of him and his ilk is when they see the howlers and dummy spitting when they are questioned, cringeworthy behaviour but when you put selfish spoilt uneducated eejits in positions of responsibility what do you expect...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, worgeordie said:

He has the makings of a D.......,better not actual say it,but can think it,they don't have thought police here yet ?

could have the Starsi knocking the door down.

regards worgeordie

 

<deleted> ?

I think he confirms it daily

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matzzon said:

Why is there any need to answer questions from any opposition?The case is already at the Ombudsmans office, and will be dealt with. Better to wait the result of that investigation, and attend to other important matters instead that is not yet on anyone table.

The chief Ombudsman is a General....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, colinneil said:

Total lack of respect, he respects no one, other than himself.

Yes and let's hope- even as cranky old buggers- that he's got to go to a place where the sun doesn't shine.

 

I'll make a merit for the whole village of my wife if that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...