Jump to content
BANGKOK
Sign in to follow this  
webfact

North Korea fires projectiles, rejects South Korea's dialogue pledge

Recommended Posts

North Korea fires projectiles, rejects South Korea's dialogue pledge

 

2019-08-16T005419Z_1_LYNXNPEF7F01Y_RTROPTP_4_NORTHKOREA-POLITICS.JPG

People visit the statues of former North Korean leaders Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il to commemorate the 74th anniversary of the end of the Japanese occupation of Korea, in this undated photo supplied by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on August 16, 2019. KCNA/ via REUTERS

 

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea launched at least two projectiles into the sea on Friday, South Korea's military said, shortly after Pyongyang described South Korea's president as "impudent" and vowed that inter-Korean talks are over.

 

The North has protested against joint military drills conducted by South Korea and the United States, which kicked off last week, calling them a rehearsal for war. It has fired several short-range missiles in recent weeks.

 

North Korea fired two more unidentified projectiles into the sea off its east coast on Friday morning, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement. South Korea's National Security Council was meeting to discuss the latest launches.

 

Japan's defence ministry said it did not see any imminent security threat from the latest projectile launch.

 

The launches have complicated attempts to restart talks between U.S. and North Korean negotiators over the future of Pyongyang's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programmes.

 

Those denuclearisation talks have been stalled despite a commitment to revive them made at a June 30 meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

 

Earlier on Friday, Pyongyang rejected a vow by South Korean President Moon Jae-in a day earlier to pursue talks with the North and to bring unification of the Koreas by 2045.

 

The loss of dialogue momentum between the North and South and the stalemate in implementing pledges made at an historic summit between their two leaders last year was entirely the responsibility of the South, a North Korean spokesman said.

 

The unidentified spokesman repeated criticism that the joint U.S.-South Korea drills were a sign of Seoul's hostility against the North.

 

"We have nothing to talk any more with the South Korean authorities nor have any idea to sit with them again," the North's spokesman for the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Country said in a statement carried by the North's official KCNA news agency.

 

The committee is the North's government agency tasked with managing relationships with the South. The rival Koreas are technically still at war after the 1950-53 Korean War ended with a truce rather than a peace treaty.

 

Moon and Kim have met three times since April last year, pledging peace and cooperation, but little progress has been made to improve dialogue and strengthen exchanges and cooperation.

 

The South's Moon said in a Liberation Day address on Thursday it was only through his policy of Korean national peace that dialogue with the North was still possible.

 

"In spite of a series of worrying actions taken by North Korea recently, the momentum for dialogue remains unshaken," Moon said in remarks marking Korea's independence from Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule.

 

The North's spokesman described Moon as an "impudent guy" who is "overcome with fright".

 

He said Moon had no standing to talk about engagement with the North because of the ongoing military manoeuvres by South Korea.

 

"His open talk about 'dialogue' between the North and the South under such a situation raises a question as to whether he has proper thinking faculty," the spokesman said.

 

It was "senseless" to think that inter-Korean dialogue would resume once the military drills with the United States were over, he said.

 

The spokesman left open the possibility of talks with the United States.

 

Trump and Kim have met twice since their first summit in Singapore last year and said their countries would continue talks. However, little progress has been made on the North's stated commitment to denuclearise.

 

(Reporting by Jack Kim, Hyunjoo Jin and Josh Smith; Additional reporting by Chris Gallagher in TOKYO; Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Paul Tait)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-08-16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, webfact said:

Trump and Kim have met twice since their first summit in Singapore last year and said their countries would continue talks. However, little progress has been made on the North's stated commitment to denuclearise.

Both of these Psychopath's just want to be on the worlds centre stage and nothing will ever happen while they are still leaders . 

Edited by keith101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Short range projectiles. I would say they are looking for attention but don't want to p!ss Trump off personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, webfact said:

"In spite of a series of worrying actions taken by North Korea recently, the momentum for dialogue remains unshaken,"

Seems to me that "momentum" ended at the Vietnam summit meeting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, webfact said:

"His open talk about 'dialogue' between the North and the South under such a situation raises a question as to whether he has proper thinking faculty," (my bold)

Diplomatic speak for "retarded."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kim knows Donald is in trouble at home he is pushing so he can get the best terms possible imo soon we will see a superficial agreement so donald can get his (win) and sanctions lifted with Kim keeping his nukes 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kim HAS to keep his nukes.

Without them he is a 5th tier leader with a backwater for a country that nobody could be bothered speaking to.

 

Any suggestion that he will give them up is simple fantasy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, zaZa9 said:

Kim HAS to keep his nukes.

Without them he is a 5th tier leader with a backwater for a country that nobody could be bothered speaking to.

 

Any suggestion that he will give them up is simple fantasy.

Plus both he and his leadership saw what happened to Gaddafi and Hussein and unsurprisingly don't want to be next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...