webfact Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Danish PM says Trump's idea of selling Greenland to U.S. is absurd FILE PHOTO: Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks during a news conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the Chancellery in Berlin, Germany, July 11, 2019. REUTERS/Hannibal Hanschke/File Photo COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - Greenland is not for sale and the idea of selling it to the United States is absurd, Denmark's prime minister said on Sunday after an economic adviser to President Donald Trump confirmed the U.S. interest in buying the world's largest island. "Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland. I strongly hope that this is not meant seriously," Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told the newspaper Sermitsiaq during a visit to Greenland. Trump confirmed to reporters on Sunday that he had recently discussed the possibility, though he said such a move was not an immediate priority. "The concept came up and ...strategically it's interesting," Trump told reporters from the tarmac in Morristown, New Jersey, as he prepared to board Air Force One. "It is not No.1 on the burner; I can tell you that." 2019-08-18T215937Z_1_LOV000L6MG4FJ_RTRMADV_STREAM-2000-16X9-MP4_USA-TRUMP-GREENLAND-ROUGH-CUT.MP4 President Donald Trump on Sunday said the concept came up about buying the world's largest island Greenland, but that it was 'not number one' on the list of priorities for his administration. Rough Cut (no reporter narration). Trump is due to visit Copenhagen early next month, when the Arctic will be on the agenda in meetings with Frederiksen and Prime Minister Kim Kielsen of Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory. White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow on Sunday initially confirmed media reports earlier in the week that Trumphad privately discussed with his advisers the idea of buying Greenland. "I don't want to predict an outcome. I'm just saying the president, who knows a thing or two about buying real estate, wants to take a look at a Greenland purchase," Kudlow told Fox News. Kudlow said the situation was "developing" and noted that U.S. President Harry Truman also had wanted to buy Greenland. "And Denmark owns Greenland, Denmark is an ally, Greenland is a strategic place, up there. And they’ve got a lot of valuable minerals," Kudlow added. A defence treaty between Denmark and the United States dating back to 1951 gives the U.S. military rights over the Thule Air Base in northern Greenland. Greenland, located between the North Atlantic and Arctic oceans, is dependent on Danish economic support. It handles its own domestic affairs while Copenhagen looks after defence and foreign policy. "It's an absurd discussion, and Kim Kielsen has of course made it clear that Greenland is not for sale. That's where the conversation ends," Frederiksen told the Danish broadcaster DR. On Friday, Greenland's foreign minister, Ane Lone Bagger, had told Reuters: "We are open for business, but we're not for sale." (Reporting by Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen; additional reporting by Sarah N. Lynch in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Alexandra Hudson and Kevin Liffey) -- © Copyright Reuters 2019-08-19 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tug Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Not surprising most of what trump says and does I find absurd as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somtamnication Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 So surreal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matzzon Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Sounds to me that dear Mr. Trump is suffering of the consequenses of the last cent just left the brain wallet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legend49 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 A defence treaty between Denmark and the United States dating back to 1951 gives the U.S. military rights over the Thule Air Base in northern Greenland. Well that can be torn up immediately. Seeing US has no respect for treaties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, webfact said: It is not No.1 on the burner; I can tell you that." Neither is trump if he truly believes this is anything but a ridiculous idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emdog Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Trump just needed a new absurd, stupid proposal to keep the chaos tank full and bubbling. It worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumbleweed Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 He should follow the standard US procedure: invent a phony threat and invade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 He is just spouting what a Trump spouts, it has no meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 It's not going to happen but it's not a bad idea for the US to acquire Greenland unless you think it was a bad idea in the long run for the US to acquire Alaska. I have no problem maintaining a deep opposition to 45 if occasionally he supports something that would be good. Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tug Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Jingthing in a way I agree with you but let’s do health care and infrastructure first yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Swagman Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 The bigger the impending avalanche of crap , the bigger the deflection required Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomazbodner Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 I'm waiting for Kim Jong Un to start discussing with his generals on idea of buying Trump from US Congress... or whoever could sell him... Make North Korea Great Again... But then there are some rumours that Putin already bought him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Henry Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Was the name to be changed from Greenland to New Ivanca Land? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Just more dribble from an uneducated mind. One of the hazards of never reading, and learning about the world. He is one of the most ignorant men in the world, no doubt about that, so what he says and does cannot really be dwelled upon too much. The fact that he is the president of the US, makes this a bit unfortunate. Just give this another 15 months. He will be gone, and on his way to prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 4 hours ago, webfact said: I'm just saying the president, who knows a thing or two about buying real estate, wants to take a look at a Greenland purchase, Does that mean Greenland has a golf course? Or it will have one? Mini golf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pegman Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Likely means Trump has finally been convinced that that climate change thing is real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perconrad Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 52 minutes ago, klauskunkel said: Does that mean Greenland has a golf course? Or it will have one? Mini golf? There are golf courses in Greenland real ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 42 minutes ago, pegman said: Likely means Trump has finally been convinced that that climate change thing is real. You're absolutely right. Actually I don't think that he didn't think it was real before. His anti-science, denialist position is for political gain to fire up his base and of course help the billionaires wanting no regulations make even more obscene profits, as if his tax cuts only for them weren't enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, spidermike007 said: Just more dribble from an uneducated mind. One of the hazards of never reading, and learning about the world. He is one of the most ignorant men in the world, no doubt about that, so what he says and does cannot really be dwelled upon too much. The fact that he is the president of the US, makes this a bit unfortunate. Just give this another 15 months. He will be gone, and on his way to prison. Yeah but a stopped clock is right twice a day, no disrespect meant to stopped clocks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 It's his Greenland New Deal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thingamabob Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 This is a good idea. Makes a lot of sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Just now, Thingamabob said: This is a good idea. Makes a lot of sense. I thought the idea was silly but your analysis has made me rethink my position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korkenzieher Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Well, the comment 'Strategically' makes it sound like a wider defence oriented concept- presumably the Canada bypass to Russia is the option - Alaska left, and Greenland right. Sounds a bit 'Cold War', but that seems to be the way the hawks amongst his advisers still see the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedrogaz Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 I see regime change in Denmark on the way and a new friendly government picked by the US that wants to sell off Greenland to replace the old nasty regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 58 minutes ago, pegman said: Likely means Trump has finally been convinced that that climate change thing is real. Or perhaps some of his donors, maybe someone with a name like Koch, who sees the melting polar icecap revealing new mineral opportunities. Is someone doing economic models to profit from the coming climate catastrophe? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/08/iceland-bids-farewell-glacier-lost-climate-change-190818162956810.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeyrobot Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 5 hours ago, Tug said: Not surprising most of what trump says and does I find absurd as well 5 hours ago, Tug said: Not surprising most of what trump says and does I find absurd as well Maybe China will buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 7 minutes ago, korkenzieher said: Well, the comment 'Strategically' makes it sound like a wider defence oriented concept- presumably the Canada bypass to Russia is the option - Alaska left, and Greenland right. Sounds a bit 'Cold War', but that seems to be the way the hawks amongst his advisers still see the world. Yes, I considered this, but his buddy Vlad would not approve. That was "Highway 1" for Soviet ships getting into the Atlantic from the ports on the northern coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, korkenzieher said: Well, the comment 'Strategically' makes it sound like a wider defence oriented concept- presumably the Canada bypass to Russia is the option - Alaska left, and Greenland right. Sounds a bit 'Cold War', but that seems to be the way the hawks amongst his advisers still see the world. Well there is already a major conflict over the ARCTIC and that's going to get much more intense with climate change. Why be naïve about that and act like that isn't already happening? Americans have an interest in being in that game going forward. As far as it happening, well extremely unlikely, but on the other hand if the price is massive and Greenland people are protected eternally from being under the U.S. system as far as things like taxation and a crappy health care system, well it's not IMPOSSIBLE either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 23 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: This is a good idea. Makes a lot of sense. Well I agree it would be desirable for the USA to have especially long term. But there is the question of whether the "sellers" are willing and also the price. So I don't think it will happen. Also the way it's been leaked is rude to the parties involved -- Denmark and Greenland. There are more diplomatic ways of exploring such possibility. The clumsy way this idea was reintroduced (it's nothing new) reduces the chances of it happening even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.