Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

What options are left for British PM Johnson on Brexit?

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Somewhere In Time said:

SEND TWO LETTERS

 

...the ensuing theatre would be priceless.

 

SIT

Receiver would just choose which one to follow they like most …..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I blame Corbyn. He has not articulated ANY policy. If he would come out and SAY what his parties policy is (2nd Ref or whatever) but all he does is say for 2 years "we want an election" then "we don't want an election" when offered one.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BobBKK said:

I blame Corbyn. He has not articulated ANY policy. If he would come out and SAY what his parties policy is (2nd Ref or whatever) but all he does is say for 2 years "we want an election" then "we don't want an election" when offered one.

Emily Thornbury has made it very clear, they would go to Brussels to secure the best possible deal for the UK then return back to the UK and vote againgst it, how much clarity do you need.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BobBKK said:

I blame Corbyn. He has not articulated ANY policy. If he would come out and SAY what his parties policy is (2nd Ref or whatever) but all he does is say for 2 years "we want an election" then "we don't want an election" when offered one.

Tactic's only tactic's to block the cheater PM. plan....nothing more and very successful , seeing the mess he is in now....

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, bannork said:

It is financial suicide, that's what it is.

Course it is.

 

image.png.d30cda0233cb8a52f2c417dcef9e5b4c.png

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe get out at any cost and start again, like a marriage too much fear of the unknown, the time has come to go

 

15 yrs ago, to get out of an eighteen month marriage, in an overseas country, I had to let go 90% of my world wide assets, a  very very substantial sum, many said madness, I even wondered, but today one of the best decisions of my life

 

The system is unfortunately wrong two thirds majority should be required for major constitutional changes then this mess would not happen

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, david555 said:

Something is in the making ….

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/10/mps-look-to-bring-back-mays-brexit-deal-with-vote-on-referendum


MPs look to bring back May's Brexit deal with vote on referendum 
Cross-party majority moving closer as more current and ex-Tories open to idea, source says

 

more...

This is a far better compromise solution:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/group-of-cross-party-mps-launch-bid-to-reach-compromise-brexit-deal/ar-AAH5g2g?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=OIE9HP

 

See Rory Stewart quote:

“If we were to go for a no-deal Brexit, we would have about half the country very angry and alienated. They would feel about no-deal Brexit the way that many of the people I’ve seen recently in the north-east feel about Mrs Thatcher,” he said.

 

“On the other side, if we want for a full remain through a second referendum, you would have about half the country feeling incredibly alienated, angry and tricked.”

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

Brits have a 'long-standing and mature reputation' for reaching a consensus agreement and, as I hope Johnson told Arlene Foster, the DUP must be willing to accept a viable compromise regarding the Irish backstop.

 

 

 

Edited by stephenterry
correction
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, spornb said:

I believe get out at any cost and start again, like a marriage too much fear of the unknown, the time has come to go

 

15 yrs ago, to get out of an eighteen month marriage, in an overseas country, I had to let go 90% of my world wide assets, a  very very substantial sum, many said madness, I even wondered, but today one of the best decisions of my life

 

The system is unfortunately wrong two thirds majority should be required for major constitutional changes then this mess would not happen

yes 2/3 is needed for serious matters …. 50/50 vote … 1 vote more could  decides for all …..lunacy !!

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...