Jump to content

Koh Panyee residents vote not to pay ‘river encroachment’ fee


webfact

Recommended Posts

Koh Panyee residents vote not to pay ‘river encroachment’ fee

By The Nation

 

800_6af9acb1f25f020.jpg?v=1568255354

 

The residents of Koh Panyee in Phang Nga’s Muang district voted on Thursday to refuse to pay fees to the Harbour Department for building houses and shops encroaching on a river on the island, a popular tourist destination. 

 

Some 100 residents attended a meeting called by Muhammad Prasarnphan, kamnan of Tambon Koh Panyee at the tambon’s public hall, and reached a resolution not to comply with the department’s order.

 

The kamnan held the meeting after the department sent a letter with a list of the 370 residents to the tambon administrative organization, demanding it collect an annual fee worth in total Bt1.4 million from the “encroachers”.

 

The meeting resolved that the Koh Panyee residents disagreed with the directive of the department on grounds that the community on the island had existed for more than 300 years and long before the marine navigation law, which the department invoked to demand the encroachment fee, took effect.

 

The residents said they were already facing difficulties in having to pay higher power and water bills than those on the mainland so the law and the directive would add to their hardship.

 

Nachapong Pranit, director of the Phang Nga Harbour Office, said the marine navigation law requires that those allowed to use buildings that encroach on navigational waterways pay a fee of Bt5 per square metre for residences and Bt100 per square metres from restaurants or commercial buildings.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30376101

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-09-12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have been to Panya City. It was a lot of fun and very interesting.  Not much going on there, just some places to eat and then walk around.  We bought some of the most beautiful cloth with gold thread and had lunch.  I don't think there is enough revenue in that little settlement to justify implementing a tax for "encroachment" or anything else.  I Hope someone in the Governments gets smart and quashes this lame idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...