Jump to content

Leading Thai economist blames inequality for Thailand’s ills


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Leading Thai economist blames inequality for Thailand’s ills

By Sirivish Toomgum
The Nation
Fukuoka, Jpan

 

800_35591ea3df6cecb.jpg

Pasuk Phongpaichit, second left, and Chris Baker, right, on stage at the Fukuoka Prize Symposium.

 

Thailand needs new thinking on its economy, moving away from the emphasis on growth and consumption to the quality of life rather than the quantity of things, said Pasuk Phongpaichit, Emeritus Professor in Political Economy, Chulalongkorn University.

 

She made the remark at the Fukuoka Prize Symposium held on September 10 in the Japanese city, in an event celebrating its 30th anniversary.

 

Pasuk and historian Chris Baker, the co-winners of the Fukuoka Prize’s 2017 Grand Prize, were among five past laureates invited to share their views in the Symposium, which had as its theme “The coexistence of developing Asia and its cultures-What Fukuoka Prize and the successive Prize laureates have protected, nurtured and newly created in last 30 years”.

 

Pasuk said that as an economy, Thailand along with others in Southeast Asia, have been doing quite successfully. But Thailand’s big problem is inequality.

 

“As we got richer, the gap between rich and poor grew wider and wider,” she said.

 

She added the economic inequality creates social division. Some people are denied their basic rights, and human respect.

 

“Our politics have been in turmoil for over a decade. Behind that turmoil is our gaping inequality. But many people hesitate to recognise that,” she said, adding that new threats from AI and climate change will make things worse. “Automation will mean less work, less income and less dignity for many, while floods, droughts and food shortages resulting from climate change will hurt the poorest and most vulnerable.

 

“Growing inequality has been a problem worldwide for around 25 years. There have been many books and reports on the subject but nothing has much been done. This is also true in Thailand. Many of our leaders now accept that inequality is a problem. They give speeches and write manifestoes promising to do something about it. They ask economists like me to give them advice, and I do so. But nothing much happens.”

 

She pointed out that one simple reason for this failure is the power wielded by large corporations and the rich, both in public positions and behind the scenes. This is very difficult to change.

 

“But we must not give up. I take inspiration from other societies which are much more equal than ours and often happier too. They show that inequality can be evened out by the public policies,”

 

She added that Thailand needs new thinking on economics, moving away from the emphasis on growth and consumption per se, towards more efficiency in the use of resources, less waste, more care, more greening of the cities, which robots cannot do, and to focus on the quality of life rather than the quantity of things.

 

“That said, inequality cannot be stamped out overnight. Thailand needs to have the continuity in the administrations run by the democratically elected governments to solve the inequality on a non-interrupted basis.”

 

Any income tax measures should not only aimed at boosting the economy but also ensuring equal income distribution.

 

Also on September 10, the Fukuoka Prize hosted an official ceremony to grant its 2019 awards to the three laureates. 

 

The Grand Prize was awarded to Philippines public sociologist Prof. Randolf David, while the Academic Prize went to Dutch historian and expert in Southeast Asian history, Professor Leonard Blussé.

 

The Arts and Culture Prize went to Japanese playwright and stage director Makoto Sato.

 

Crown Prince Akishino and his wife Crown Princess Kiko were also present at the ceremony.

 

David is a sociologist who has played a dynamic part in achieving social justice in the Philippines, by sharing his knowledge not only with the students through his university lectures but also more widely with the general public through TV programmes and newspaper columns.

 

He has also striven for intellectual and cultural exchanges and mutual understanding among Asian countries, through cooperative links with the United Nations University and Japanese university lecturers and intellectuals.

 

His determination and activity to transform currently existing society for the better, by opening universities to the public and by working together with citizens or overseas countries, have won him high praise as a leading Asian public intellectual, a man of action as well as ideas.

 

Blussé has created a new academic field, broad in its chronological and geographical scope, “the maritime history of early modern East/Southeast Asia”, establishing an interdisciplinary approach as a foundation for historical studies.

 

His studies began from Sinology, then some elements of Japanese Studies were added, before embracing the maritime history of East Asia with his studies about Overseas Chinese, and have now expanded to include maritime history of Southeast Asia.

 

In the currently popular trend of “global history” in historical studies, his approach is highly regarded as providing an ideal framework based on empirical micro analysis without ever losing the macro conceptual perspective.

 

Stage director and playwright Sato, meanwhile, has created a large number of outstanding theatrical productions which combine a contemporary ambience with traditional aesthetic sensibility.

 

His innovative work has been highly praised both in Japan and abroad. He has also taken a leading role in promoting international exchange with Asian theatrical professionals, and enhancing the construction of regional networks.

 

Furthermore, working as the artistic director of public theatres, he has engaged in embodying the concept of “theatre as a meeting point for local people”, and thus completely transformed the conventional image of public halls.

 

The Fukuoka Prize is an internationally recognized award organized by Fukuoka City. It is given to individuals and/or groups that have contributed to the preservation and creation of Asian cultures.

 

The Grand Prize is presented to individual/group who has made outstanding contributions to the preservation and creation of Asian culture and have exhibited the significance of Asian culture to the world through the internationality, universality, popularity and/or creativity of their work.

 

The Academic Prize goes to individuals/groups that have made outstanding achievements in the field of Asian studies, contributing to the world's understanding of Asia. It covers the fields of social sciences, such as history, archaeology, cultural anthropology, economics, and political science.

 

The Arts and Culture Prize is awarded to individuals/groups that have made outstanding contributions in the cultivation and/or advancement of the unique and diverse arts and culture of Asia. It covers the fields such as fine arts, literature, music, drama, dance, film, architecture, traditional and ethnic culture.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30376120

 

logo2.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-09-12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's like this around the world. During the Roaring Twenties, leading up to The Great Depression, income inequality was almost as bad as it could get. The U.S. wealth disparity today is even worse than back then. Funny coincidence, political division gets rabid and mean spirited in such times. It's almost as if the rich don't want us working together to call them on their "stuff" (since we can't use the "s" word any more).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, snoop1130 said:

Leading Thai economist blames inequality for Thailand’s ills

Sadly, that will be ignored completely by the top knobs. The government aren't interested in inequality. That's how they keep their positions at the trough now.

 

Although Pasuk Phongpaichit is telling the truth, I can see her being sidelined unless she's very careful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, snoop1130 said:

Leading Thai economist blames inequality for Thailand’s ills

Fantastic that someone has the courage to speak out and tell it as it is. Especially at an international Japanese symposium. Rather embarrassing for PM Prayut whose primary job is the protect the wealth of the filthy rich and stop it falling into the hands of the poor and needy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taichiplanet said:

Wow. Her speech needs to be nailed onto a tree in every village. Oh, and put it on facebook but make the heading something like 'Top Thai Economist has foolproof way to guess lucky numbers'; then its guaranteed to be read. Maybe i am being a little harsh.

But they see it most nights in their favourite TV viewing.....the Thai soap opera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She makes it sound easy, as though it were only a matter of economics and will and public policy, the kind of public policy that "nudges" people in the right direction. But inequality is part of the fabric of Thai culture, it's expressed in the unspoken hierarchy in which everyone has a designated place on the ladder, it's the worldview which makes everyone feel they belong and are secure. How do you change that without removing some part of every person's identity? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The military and other institutions not only siphon money from the economy, but the allow the rich to get richer everyday.  The crazy labor laws restrict intelligent people who would fill four and five star hotels and create better opportunities.  Most of us are tired of Thai officialdom.    When the is concentrated at the top, very little trickle down occurs.  It stays concentrated, and given the strength of the Baht, it probably finds its way to overseas purchases which still denies the average Thai opportunities. 

 

There are over 300K conscript serving in the military.  Are they needed ?  How much do they cost the Thai taxpayer per head ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Thailand needs new thinking on its economy, moving away from the emphasis on growth and consumption to the quality of life rather than the quantity of things, said Pasuk Phongpaichit

That is right !

Scientists should replace politicians . Politicians are controlled by big companies and the financial markets , that leads finally to destruction , Scientists know better than them what needs to be done now .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, soistalker said:

It's much easier to say what the problem is than to offer a viable solution. She offers no solution. 

Typical Thai. 

I think the fact she's stood up and stated the problem is very surprising - and good.

 

The solution is in the hands of those behind the muppets who appear to be running the country.

 

For Pasuk Phongpaichit to say what needs to be done, will, in my opinion, get her into a lot of trouble. So your comment 'typical Thai' is a pretty pointless jibe at someone who's had the guts to say what she's said so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, berrec said:

It's only a rort if you are not in on it!

Believe we can agree on that the focus itself is good, BUT and unfortunately there is often a small, but significant difference between theory and practice in general and for Thailand in particular backed by its history especially in cases where money talks ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...