BobBKK Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 14 hours ago, steven100 said: As we all expected …. Khun Prayut Chan O Cha is sufficiently qualified to hold the position of Prime Minister of Thailand. good job !! Possibly his predecessor/s were not. TVF biggest TROLL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papafarang Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 Very big brown envelope for that one many in fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtco Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 What was that old Cilla Black TV programme called??? Oh yes I remember ... SURPRISE SURPRISE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaiguzzi Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The Opposition pointed out that Article 98 prohibits state officials from contesting an election. However, the Constitutional Court ruled that Prayut’s post as chief of NCPO could not be considered that of a state official, ???????????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanLaew Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 The Constitutional Court cited the following criteria previously used in 2000 (possibly during challenges for the nations first Senate elections under the Thaksin regime?), to determine if someone is or has been a state official. 1 - appointed and/or elected by law; 2 - having the authority and duty to enforce laws and perform routine functions; 3 - being under the command or supervision of the state; 4 - and receiving a regular wage or salary. So it is clear that the PM, as a usurper of power, clearly doesn't fit these categories. So, moving right along, how can someone who very publicly committed an illegal, criminal act of overthrowing a seated government by military coup become an acceptable choice for Thai PM? That protection was written into the frequently ass-raped Thai Constitution by the previous military C-i-C usurper-come-MP when he was reviewing his life after military service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 2 hours ago, NanLaew said: 1 - appointed and/or elected by law Wasn't Prayut elected by the NLA to become PM - Head of Government? Did not PM Prayut visit POTUS Trump in Washington D.C. as Head of Government? Certainly Prayut didn't go to D.C. as Chief of the NCPO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d2b2 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 18 hours ago, steven100 said: As we all expected …. Khun Prayut Chan O Cha is sufficiently qualified to hold the position of Prime Minister of Thailand. good job !! Possibly his predecessor/s were not. I think it was expected by all because he has the military weapons in his control and his appointments on the court. That seems to be the only qualifications required to be a Prime Minister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven100 Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 4 hours ago, d2b2 said: I think it was expected by all because he has the military weapons in his control and his appointments on the court. That seems to be the only qualifications required to be a Prime Minister. agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, steven100 said: agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ Moved, but don't know where - certainly not on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmsally Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, steven100 said: agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ Assuming this statement is being serious, it depends what time frame you are looking at. Thailand has never had much of a security issue so bit of a moot point. How would you argue that the country has economic stability when the disparity in wealth is so enormous. Government in control, hmmm, in control of what exactly. Thailand may have once had a chance to move on but I fear that boat may have sailed a while ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 28 minutes ago, steven100 said: agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ Guess security has certainly improved, especially by treating long term expats as potential criminals and terrorists by reporting your movements evertime you go for a leak and reporting again when said leak is finished - that's really moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiSoLowSoNoSo Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 9 hours ago, Papafarang said: Very big brown envelope for that one many in fact Maybe they can get some new mountainside villas in a nice National park as compensation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d2b2 Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 14 hours ago, steven100 said: agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ You are living in a fantasy. You are confused. Thailand has become a military state and it’s people have lost the democracy and their liberty, and for what? So the corrupt can continue to rob the nation of its treasure and it’s future? The protests, lawlessness and mayhem you speak of, were arranged by the man you champion, as a pretext for seizing power. Thailand suffers needlessly. You need therapy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkidlad Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 14 hours ago, steven100 said: agree … but Thailand is much better now so far as security, economic stability and a government in control. Before it was protests, lawlessness, and mayhem, at least now the country has moved on/ Come in and deliberately cause trouble. Get a reaction from the other side and then violently crack down on the people you instigated the trouble with. Then you tell the country you're the saviours. Rich elite 1-0 dumb dumbs who believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.