Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Teenager Thunberg angrily tells U.N. climate summit 'you have stolen my dreams'

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Why do you think the UN has the authority to decide matters of science? And why would anyone be bound by any decision they do or don't make?

 

Oh and of course, the science is not settled. Constantly repeating it won't make it so.

196 COUNTRIES signed the Paris Accord. That's about all of them. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pegman said:

I should have known from your avatar pic.  It was my displeasure, for many years, to have to spend one or two weeks a month in Cowtown. The only good thing I remember about that place was Tuesday pasta nite at the Pallister Hotel lounge.  One of the worst days of my work career was when I found out the corporation i dealt with was moving their headquarters from the great city of Montreal to Calgary. I cried for a week. I should add Caesar's Steak House & Lounge have the best grilled steak in Canada.

 

Back on topic. Real  science  not paid for image.jpg.d64c54c06f451ed8f151de303372ec0d.jpgby the fossil fuel industry. 

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

 

What that graph shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that even when you increase CO2 by 40% you see no difference in warming that cannot be attributed to natural causes. It is the nail in the coffin for climate hysteria.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get the co2 chart what does it say the percentage is as part of the atmosphere? I thought it was 0.04% and of that a mere 3% was man made, hardly something for Greta to be pouting and shouting about. Looking at people trying to interview her without her handlers stopping them she cannot answer simple questions.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rabas said:

 

We are currently in an ice age with worsening periodic freeze ups (glaciations).  Each freeze up drops Earth's already historically low CO2 levels to the point of death. As things start dying, massive atmospheric dust starts melting the miles deep ice and the cycles continue. They don't call CO2 the molecule of life for no reason.

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987116300305

Worsening periodic freeze ups, what ever they are.

 

Evidence please.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

What that graph shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that even when you increase CO2 by 40% you see no difference in warming that cannot be attributed to natural causes. It is the nail in the coffin for climate hysteria.

Perhaps you should read the linked article from where the graph was taken.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Orton Rd said:

I don't get the co2 chart what does it say the percentage is as part of the atmosphere? I thought it was 0.04% and of that a mere 3% was man made, hardly something for Greta to be pouting and shouting about. Looking at people trying to interview her without her handlers stopping them she cannot answer simple questions.

Sorry to break this to you but Greta is not a climate scientist or a scientist of any kind.

 

She’s a child who has raised her voice and, as children often do, hit the nail on the head.

 

Hence her massive global following.

 

 

Out of the mouths of babes.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

..  as children often do, hit the nail on the head.

Not in my experience

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Lots of kids have good memorization skills.

Especially the autistic ones

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sorry to break this to you but Greta is not a climate scientist or a scientist of any kind.

 

She’s a child who has raised her voice and, as children often do, hit the nail on the head.

 

Hence her massive global following.

 

 

Out of the mouths of babes.

So as I thought she does not know what she is talking about and is just a puppet being told what to say. Not worthy of any following.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Worsening periodic freeze ups, what ever they are.

 

Evidence please.

Weak response from my good friend and fellow academic researcher! Glad to see you don't refute my main premise that Earth's CO2 levels have been periodically hitting dangerous lows during man's accent in the last million years.

 

freeze ups: I defined in my post = glaciations.

Periodic cycles: see Milankovitch Cycles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Has she said a single thing that has not been said before, over and over again for years?

To you, she hit the nail on the head, translates to: She recited her lines perfectly.

Lots of kids have good memorization skills.

What does it matter if what she is saying has been said over and over again for years?

 

The Fact is she has millions of people across the globe listening to her.

 

I think her naysayers Harte on TVF have about 12 followers, and that includes each other.

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

What does it matter if what she is saying has been said over and over again for years?

 

The Fact is she has millions of people across the globe listening to her.

 

Well you were explaining why she is special. Her words are actually quite mainstream. Which is why they resonate with you. Puppet love.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Sujo said:

You guys still going on about this.

 

The UN gathered the best climate scientists in the world. They investigated all the evidence and made their decision. 

 

The science is settled and no amount of posturing from pundits on here will change that.

err, how about two of the chief reviewers

in their respective field in that ipcc report that got ignored

and voted down cause their expertise didnt 

fit ipcc agenda ?

from 12 min where they vent their displeasure

that ipcc ignored the experts and wrote the opposite

in the report

and here from 58 min, note how the cheeky sods

in ipcc still insist and pretend that the scientists

are behind the report.

 

scientists are upset they are silenced

to further ipcc agenda, and yet ipcc pretend

their report is based on the very same scientists that

told them their rap was junk

 

 

ipcc cencored.jpg

ipcc censored 1.jpg

ipcc censored 2.jpg

ipcc censored 3.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...