Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Teenager Thunberg angrily tells U.N. climate summit 'you have stolen my dreams'

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Airbagwill said:

So, who to believe, the unequivocal evidence as presented by Greta Thunberg and David Attenborough or the inane misogynistic blitherings of those on this thread. 

You are just making fools of yourselves.

I would sooner listen to the likes of distinguished scientists like William Happer, Richard Lindzen, Willie Soon and Freeman Dyson.

 

Greta Thunberg & David Attenborough? LOL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, RickBradford said:

All she has presented are the warmed-over opinions of the activists who are moving her round the globe, combined with the occasional petulance of the teenager that she is.

Don't forget taking selfies with Obama, Trudeau, Di Caprio and Schwarzy, that should do miracles for climate warming :whistling:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Airbagwill & @Chomper Higgot

 

Care to discuss Arctic sea ice extent and hiding of data?

 

This graph of Arctic sea ice extent is from NOAA website (1979 onwards)

Link: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/snow-and-ice/extent/sea-ice/N/0

 

15748875_Screenshot_2019-11-12SeaIceandSnowCoverExtentSnowandIceNationalCentersforEnvironmentalInformation(NCEI).png.8e295b28a89be6ec0634faa3c0f66785.png

 

 

What they don't show you is the data prior to 1979

Source: IPCC Report 1990 https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf

 

1214606418_Screenshot_2019-11-12ipcc_far_wg_I_full_reportpdf.png.e138aedcb4de2f45a46fe8a7247a0494.png

 

The report goes on to state that there are significant decreases in open water within the ice and no change in ice thickness of around 2m.

 

So sea ice extent seems pretty stable.

Edited by grollies
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Never let the facts get in the way of the new cult

As Brendan O'Neill described it, the climate change movements " .. become belief systems that are cleaved to, not because they have been tested and discussed in the public sphere, but because their adherents just know that they are right.

 

"These are the perfect conditions in which arrogance and intellectual hollowness can flourish, and in which defensiveness and fury become the default responses to any challenge from outside."

 

It rings very true.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, RickBradford said:

As Brendan O'Neill described it, the climate change movements " .. become belief systems that are cleaved to, not because they have been tested and discussed in the public sphere, but because their adherents just know that they are right.

 

"These are the perfect conditions in which arrogance and intellectual hollowness can flourish, and in which defensiveness and fury become the default responses to any challenge from outside."

 

It rings very true.

As you can see-many hundreds are interested in your point of view...even tho' you have been given a free run.

 

Died in the wool brexiteeer,alternative rightest,climate change denialist,Trumpist,Tommy Robinson supporter. and, of course,a lover of the fried Mars bar..😂

 

Not a single one of you are able to post your academic qualifications on this forum-because,I suspect ,you have none.

 

Blather away-it's free..

Edited by Odysseus123
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Odysseus123 said:

As you can see-many hundreds are interested in your point of view...even tho' you have been given a free run.

 

Died in the wool brexiteeer,alternative rightest,climate change denialist,Trumpist,Tommy Robinson supporter. and, of course,a lover of the fried Mars bar..😂

172 pages, and that's the silliest post of the entire thread.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Odysseus123 said:

As you can see-many hundreds are interested in your point of view...even tho' you have been given a free run.

 

Died in the wool brexiteeer,alternative rightest,climate change denialist,Trumpist,Tommy Robinson supporter. and, of course,a lover of the fried Mars bar..😂


 

Don’t generalize much, do you ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind the sea ice data, here's data tampering of sea level data:

 

NASA graph 1870 - 2013

Link: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

1715108818_Screenshot_2019-11-12SeaLevelNASAGlobalClimateChange.png.a62fd5a623083c9e36376290d01a9308.png

 

Now here's James Hansen's graph 1880 - 1980

Link: https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1982/1982_Gornitz_go05100g.pdf

 

1493191671_Screenshot_2019-11-121982_Gornitz_go05100gpdf.png.06b9f01425805e0c1d04070ed782d379.png

 

And here are the two graphs superimposed onto one another

 

1319005105_Screenshot_2019-11-12AcceleratingSeaLevelFraudInClimateScienceRealClimateScience(1).png.9530027177d117cbf083da621a872619.png

 

Can you see a pattern emerging here?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Odysseus123 said:

Hmmm..go Greta go!

 

But then I am not engaging in psuedo-intellectualism am I?

 

I am merely pointing out the very close link between Trumpists,Brexiteers,mysogonists ,climate change denialists,alternative rightests and addicts of the internet in general.

 

My academic qualifications at least allow me to ponder on these subjects..

 

I guess that you wouldn't like to see another photo of our native birds,eh?

what is the link between brits wanting to leave EU

and republicans in USA ? and how do you link them two closely

to 'climate change denialists', which is in itself a misnomer,

since the group you now refer to generally aknowledge

that climate has changed over history, -unlike the activists

that deny there ever was a medieval warm period or minor ice age.

 

this is such a bunch of confusion that it indicates you

just fired up a cannabis bong and think that qualify as education.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Odysseus123 said:

But an adult does not base their opinons on a bunch of a climate denialists posting on a free internet site,nu?

 

Climate denialiats who cannot admit to any form of academic qualifiications,who persistently support brexit,Trump.alt right wing propaganda,and who support misogyny on a grand scale are not to be taken seriously.

 

When challenged not a single one of then cam provide a single piece of evidence that they have ever visited Thailand in their lives which seems kinda strange for a Thailand forum.

 

Gone down the drain where they belong..

firstly, i dont deny medieval warm period and minor ice age,

can you confirm whether you accept that part of climate history or deny it ?

 

secondly im retired and didnt bring my engineering graduate papers when i moved to thailand,

i had zero intent to work in thailand, i couldnt give a rats ar$e what england do,

but i think politicians should obey the vote they asked for on principal a basis,

this is exactly the field where consensus has any kind of legitimacy.

 

thirdly just give me a suggestion of what you constitute as proof

that i live in pattaya and ill see if its a reasonable request

Edited by brokenbone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A large number of bickering/personal/off topic posts removed.

 

Given the deterioration and age of this topic, it is now CLOSED.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...