Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

U.S. House to launch Trump impeachment inquiry over Ukraine controversy

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

"Shenanigans" reported tirelessly by an exposed and biased Jeff Zucker controlled CNN.

Shenanigans unearthed in a one-sided, secretive star chamber buried deep in some basement on 

the Hill.

Shenanigans presented as truth without allowing the accused any counsel, or legal rights, or opportunity

to cross-examine, or present witnesses that counter any inaccuracies.

 

Yeahhhh, that'll work gangbusters. 🤣🤣🤣

Ya got a problem with grand juries? That's how they work. These proceedings are the equivalent of a grand jury. The trial takes place in the Senate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Longcut said:

Treaty 106-16

 

Joe Biden was a member of the U.S. Senate and then signed by then-President Bill Clinton. 

A comprehensive treaty agreement that allows cooperation between both the United States and Ukraine in the investigation and prosecution of crimes. 

It appears President Trump was following the law to the letter when it comes to unearthing the long-standing corruption that has swirled in Ukraine and allegedly involves powerful Democrats like Joe Biden and others.

Post image

“To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998. I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, an exchange of notes which was signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application, as well as the report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaty. The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in order to counter criminal activities more effectively. The Treaty should be an effective tool to assist in the prosecution of a wide variety of crimes, including drug trafficking offenses. The Treaty is self-executing. It provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restraint, confiscation, forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the requested state. I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to ratification.”

WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

 

That's great news. Obviously, it applies to president Trump as well, given Biden literally bragged about extorting Ukraine. Of course, his crack addict son getting a cush job shortly after Biden being put in charge of relations with Ukraine makes it even more suspicious. The fact that an investigation into Burisma was in progress when Biden extorted Ukraine makes an investigation absolutely mandatory. And now that a diplomat has gone on record to say he was ignored when he sounded the alarm on these shenanigans? What rational person would NOT think a criminal investigation should be held?

  • Like 2
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic posts and the off topic replies have been removed.  This topic is not about the recent tiff between Tulsi Gabbard and Hillary Clinton. 

 

A post with insulting comments to another member has been removed.  

 

Edit:  Some more off topic posts and troll posts have been removed.

Edited by metisdead
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

This video should be a sticky on top of every Ukraine related thread. THIS is corruption, 100% blatant and obvious. 

In what way did joe Biden personally or illicitly benefit from this action? in what way was it dishonest or criminal?

 

Biden’s actions were not hidden away on a secret server, but done in public (obvious... as you point out) and in line with US and allied partners foreign policy. He ticks none of the boxes

 

the trump, on the other hand, well..... ding ding ding! Winner winner chicken dinner, and we all know what the prize is. Ment-peach-‘im

 

“In general, corruption is a form of dishonesty or criminal activity undertaken by a person or organization entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire illicit benefit, or, abuse of entrusted power for one's private gain.”
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A post in violation of fair use policy has been removed:

 

14) You will not post any copyrighted material except as fair use laws apply (as in the case of news articles). Please only post a link, the headline and the first three sentences.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

He benefited from the action by protecting his son's employer from an ongoing investigation. It appears he also protected Hillary Clinton as well as other apparent shady dealings in the Ukraine, including but not limited to:

Regards HRC... sure... whatever... investigate her again and again if it makes you feel good, but why are you bringing up Hillary in relation to my post about Biden? It is unrelated

 

now ... if we can get back to Biden’s actions... how did removing a prosecutor that was universally seen as corrupt, help joe Biden, who was acting in plain sight, in line with public US policy

 

how was Biden’s actions dishonest?

what illicit gain was made?

il·lic·it
/i(l)ˈlisit/
adjective
  1. forbidden by law, rules, or custom.

https://www.google.co.th/search?q=illicit&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-th&client=safari

 

are you saying that the corrupt prosecutor whom was removed from office, was over zealously investigating Biden’s sons employer, and would have corruptly found against Biden, and that this potentially negative finding was circumvented following the appointment of an honest prosecutor?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First of all, I don't believe this to be true.
Secondly, it is not important in the context of an inquiry into Trump's illegal activities. This is just deflecting.


Of course. Anything anyone else has ever done is deflection. The ONLY thing that matters is whether we can get Trump.
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...