Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

U.S. House to launch Trump impeachment inquiry over Ukraine controversy

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

I discounted a person I disagree with who has a document history of omitting crucial facts and twisting things. I also pointed out that the State Dept. has no business using Trump's private attorney. If allegation were being made, there's something called the Dept. of Justice for handling that. Or is William Barr also working for the Deep State?

man, that is some weak response. this whole thing is going to boomerang in epic fashion.

 

Image result for biden boomerang

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hope that America gets something in exchange for 'aid' to the Ukraine. Quid pro Quo is the object of foriegn aid. Biden's son got his Quo already from the Ukraine.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

man, that is some weak response. this whole thing is going to boomerang in epic fashion.

 

Image result for biden boomerang

"Man, that is some weak response". This is what's called an all purpose retort that addresses nothing specifically. It's the kind of thing you might expect from an AI bot.

"this whole thing is going to boomerang in epic fashion."

More fact-free stuff. Some people just love referencing the future because it's impossible to fact-check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

"Man, that is some weak response". This is what's called an all purpose retort that addresses nothing specifically. It's the kind of thing you might expect from an AI bot.

"this whole thing is going to boomerang in epic fashion."

More fact-free stuff. Some people just love referencing the future because it's impossible to fact-check.

well, you have made up your conclusions of presumed guilt years ago and are doing the same with this, as have the same leftist cabal of TVF posters. that is ok though, it has backfired in spectacular fashion. please keep it up.

Edited by elmrfudd
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just now, elmrfudd said:

well, you have made up your conclusions of presumed guilt years ago, as have the same leftist cabal of TVF posters. that is ok though, it has back fired in spectacular fashion. please keep it up.

Another fact-free allegation. The kind of comeback that could have been the reply of an AI bot. You've got nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This is not just about Ukraine, there is much more to it and were about to find out how much more to it.

Absolutely!  The whistleblower report supposedly refers to "a foreign leader."  The WH jumped in front of this and said Ukraine, but if we don't see the unedited/unredacted report it's just more of the usual rubbish.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bendejo said:

Absolutely!  The whistleblower report supposedly refers to "a foreign leader."  The WH jumped in front of this and said Ukraine, but if we don't see the unedited/unredacted report it's just more of the usual rubbish.

 

Actually, the Wall Street Journal first reported that it was the Ukraine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

 

Another fact-free allegation. The kind of comeback that could have been the reply of an AI bot. You've got nothing.

you seem really fixated about the bot nonsense. you presented no facts, ....this is all based assumption of guilt, on your part

 

you actually believe bots are in this thread, amazing

Edited by elmrfudd
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

you seem really fixated about the bot nonsense. you presented no facts, ....this is all based assumption of guilt, on your part

 

you actually believe bots are in this thread, amazing

 I didn't allege you were an AIbot. I alleged your comments were like those that would be produced by an AI bot. General comments with nothing specific. No evidence offered.

As for facts about the impeachment case, I did present them. I pointed out that the IG thought the issues raised by the whistleblower warranted urgent attention. How is that based on an assumption of guilt? Am I misrepresenting what the IG said? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

nonsense, you continue to use the wapo/nyt with their obvious bias , then discount a person you do not agree with. sad, but not unexpected.

 

If the state dept asked for the meeting, then there your assertions are mute.

April:

"But many of the allegations shared with me by more than a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials are supported by evidence that emerged in recent U.S. court filings and intelligence reports. The Ukrainians told me their evidence includes:"...

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, DoctorG said:

and yet you reference something as an editorial when in fact it is just another opinion piece. 

What are you on about? Editorials are opinion pieces.

"a newspaper article written by or on behalf of an editor that gives an opinion on a topical issue."

This one comes from the Editorial Board of the NY Times. Ya can't get much more editorial than that.

And I really can't believe that there are posters who actually liked your post. Probably a Pavlovian response.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...