rooster59 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Judge shoots self in court after being forced to change verdict A judge, Mr. Kanakorn Pianchana, shot himself in the chest in an apparent suicide attempt after delivering a verdict in Yala’s provincial court this afternoon (Friday). Spokesman for the court said that Mr. Kanakorn is now out of danger after being rushed to the provincial hospital, adding that the judge might be suffering from stress. A statement, purportedly written by Mr. Kanakorn, has been widely shared on social media and claims that he had been approached by someone who forced him to change the not guilty verdicts against five defendants, condemning three of them to death and sending another two to prison, despite the lack of sufficient evidence to convict any of them. Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/judge-shoots-self-in-court-after-being-forced-to-change-verdict/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-10-05 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just1Voice Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Now THAT is some heavy duty pressure on a judge by someone with substantial connections & influence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mavideol Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 15 minutes ago, Just1Voice said: Now THAT is some heavy duty pressure on a judge by someone with substantial connections & influence. did you mean some from Prayut's gang 555 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
car720 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 We joke and laugh about it because T.I.T. but in reality the same type of gangsters that are running this guy are running every government in the world. What chance the little guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briggsy Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 hour ago, rooster59 said: shot himself in the chest How very convenient for somebody. Is this really believable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanLaew Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 I guess that showed 'em, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phetpeter Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 If true, he should state the name of the person who initiated he change the verdict, so the person can tell everybody why he has done it. Not just state 'someone' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael888 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Will the case of the five men be re opened now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBOP Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 How did he get a gun into court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denim Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 2 hours ago, rooster59 said: ...adding that the judge might be suffering from stress. Not to mention a bullet hole in his chest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Weird Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 "A statement, purportedly written by Mr. Kanakorn, has been widely shared on social media and claims that he had been approached by someone who forced him to change the not guilty verdicts..." There's a couple of very important words to bear in mind with this article, "purportedly" and "claims". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven100 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 One would assume someone connected very high up threatened him and he bowed to the pressure. Now that he didn't succeed in his attempt to end it all, will he be coming forward with naming the perpetrator. I won't hold my breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tchooptip Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 "despite the lack of sufficient evidence to convict any of them" The judge believed there was not enough evidence but at last three of them were condemned to the death penalty. One can understand that the judge was upset and more could feel guilty for not having had the courage or the strength to refuse such an injustice. My wife saw the story on TV it could be a minister who gave this order? But since the judge is not dead the story is far from finished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravip Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Briggsy said: How very convenient for somebody. Is this really believable? Nah... someones dream...living inside a bubble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
off road pat Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 "The judge claims that other junior judges in the court of first instance, like him, are also subjected to the same pressure" !?!? we all suspected this in many cases but now we are sure !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkidlad Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 3 hours ago, rooster59 said: A statement, purportedly written by Mr. Kanakorn, has been widely shared on social media and claims that he had been approached by someone who forced him to change the not guilty verdicts against five defendants, condemning three of them to death And I wonder just how many times judges here have been told what the verdict should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedrogaz Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 IF anyone wanted proof of the exceptional corruption in Thailand, here it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nip Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Methinks in order to restore the eh 'good name' of the Thai judicial system that eh the errant Judge will be pronounced sufficiently stressed to spend time in a psychiatric facility and will return to apoligise for his ill founded indiscretion due to stress and then retire or the inballance in his brain will be ballanced by a small lump of lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alant Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Tchooptip said: But since the judge is not dead the story is far from finished I think it may be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinChin67 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 He was willing to kill himself but did not tell who pressured him. I guess he was blackmailed to silence and it was so bad he choose to shoot himself.. Family threatened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benmart Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Such heartless and flippant comments from some very sick people concerning a tragic story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampant20 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 hour ago, phetpeter said: If true, he should state the name of the person who initiated he change the verdict, so the person can tell everybody why he has done it. Not just state 'someone' Maybe he thought if he says someone and kills himself that his family would be safe from reprisals if he was to mention names. Just a thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BestB Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 whatever happened, have to praise the man for his braveness to put a statement out to bring attention to corruption in courts. Best wishes for speedy recovery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alzack Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 3 hours ago, Just1Voice said: Now THAT is some heavy duty pressure on a judge by someone with substantial connections & influence. THE ARMY has substantial connections & influence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BestB Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, alzack said: THE ARMY has substantial connections & influence. Has nothing to do with the army, he was clear in his statement, senior judges who oversee verdicts prior to ruling, and forcing junior judges to make different verdicts if its not to their liking. Who puts pressure on senior judges? may be Mr Baht Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sawadeeken Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 WOW!!!! wow!!!!!! TIT (This Is Thailand)........ "UN believable" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedhump Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 2 hours ago, NanLaew said: I guess that showed 'em, eh? Could you maybe imagine that guilt, deep shame and remorse overwhelmed someone who is sworn to uphold the law? Maybe those feelings are alien to you anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedhump Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 10 minutes ago, Donaldo said: He should have followed his conscience and handed out the appropriate verdict. If that wasn't the one he was expected to give he would be dead soon enough. No need for him to lay hand himself. I am sure that threats may have been in place against those close to him if he didn't deliver? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 4 hours ago, rooster59 said: A statement, purportedly written by Mr. Kanakorn, has been widely shared on social media and claims that he had been approached by someone who forced him to change the not guilty verdicts If I was in his shoes and going to kill myself, I would make sure to name the person who did make me change the verdict, not only in that statement but wherever I can think of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parker2100 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 3 hours ago, car720 said: We joke and laugh about it because T.I.T. but in reality the same type of gangsters that are running this guy are running every government in the world. What chance the little guy? If it were gangsters, wouldn't they want the verdicts to be Not Guilty? The fact that they wanted guilty verdicts, suggests that pressure came from Government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.