Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Thanathorn says General Apirat’s controversial speech may fuel hatred among Thais

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, robblok said:

I always thought it was a meteor and more volcano activity not what you said. Do you have anything to back up what you said ? I mean who taught you that ? Or did you just wanted to look cool with your reply ?

 

 

It’s an analogy, you apologist. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, robblok said:

I doubt your right otherwise the party supporting the military would not have gotten so much votes. So a lot might hate the army but a lot seem to like them too. 

 

I suggest reading to understand, how they were going to have plenty of votes regardless.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-election-rules-explainer/numbers-game-how-thailands-election-system-favors-pro-army-parties-idUSKCN1R20OV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

It’s an analogy, you apologist. 

Its not true.. I guess that is the difference i keep to facts and you dont. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, robblok said:

I doubt your right otherwise the party supporting the military would not have gotten so much votes. So a lot might hate the army but a lot seem to like them too. 

I don't think that's true as no campaigning allowed for ages and the EC changing the rules is not a fair election. More people voted for the other parties than the Army Party and they even banned one party.  24% of the vote does not constitute a mandate when 76% voted against them.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BobBKK said:

I don't think that's true as no campaigning allowed for ages and the EC changing the rules is not a fair election. More people voted for the other parties than the Army Party and they even banned one party.  24% of the vote does not constitute a mandate when 76% voted against them.

Fair or not they gotten a lot of votes, people seem to forget it and make it out like everyone was against the army. That is just not true. I want them gone but unlike some posters I won't twist the facts. They had as much votes as the PTP.. I dont think that is a little bit. 

 

Also to count all parties as against the military is again a distortion of facts. The democrats and Bumjaithai are not votes against the military per se. Votes for future forward were. 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, robblok said:

Its not true.. I guess that is the difference i keep to facts and you dont. 

It’s an ‘analogy’. I’m sure you use them in your first language too. 
 

Here’s a fact for you: Thaksin isn’t the PM anymore. He hasn’t been for while. Move on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

It’s an ‘analogy’. I’m sure you use them in your first language too. 
 

Here’s a fact for you: Thaksin isn’t the PM anymore. He hasn’t been for while. Move on. 

I am not talking about Thaksin, if someone says the dinosaurs were killed by the little animals they preyed on its a distortion of facts and history. You seem to be ok with distorting facts as long as it suits your views. You could be Thrumps brother. 

 

I on the other hand have no need to rewrite history or distort facts to make a point.

 

Analogies only work if they are based on real things.. not things that were made up.

 

Get over yourself.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, robblok said:

I am not talking about Thaksin, if someone says the dinosaurs were killed by the little animals they preyed on its a distortion of facts and history. You seem to be ok with distorting facts as long as it suits your views. You could be Thrumps brother. 

 

I on the other hand have no need to rewrite history or distort facts to make a point.

 

Analogies only work if they are based on real things.. not things that were made up.

 

Get over yourself.

Again, it’s an ‘analogy’. Analogies can be anything you like. 
 

Thaksin is gone. The boogeymen are now communists. 
 

 

Edited by rkidlad
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, nickstav said:

The whole purpose of the speech was to fuel hatred, and the military has one chip that they always throw into the pot to cement their legitimacy...loyalty to the monarchy.

I was under the impression that overthrowing a government (caretaker or not) was treason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, billd766 said:

I was under the impression that overthrowing a government (caretaker or not) was treason.

If he is not contained quickly this viperous creature will bring hell to Thailand's doorstep. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, robblok said:

I am not talking about Thaksin, if someone says the dinosaurs were killed by the little animals they preyed on its a distortion of facts and history. You seem to be ok with distorting facts as long as it suits your views. You could be Thrumps brother. 

 

I on the other hand have no need to rewrite history or distort facts to make a point.

 

Analogies only work if they are based on real things.. not things that were made up.

 

Get over yourself.

But who really knows what happened to the dinosaurs,as there was no

one there to see what happened,it could have been a disease they caught,

from the little animals,that wiped them out.

regards worgeordie

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

But who really knows what happened to the dinosaurs,as there was no

one there to see what happened,it could have been a disease they caught,

from the little animals,that wiped them out.

regards worgeordie

I trust the scientific consensus on this topic, and that is they were wiped out by a meteor and more volcanic activity. 

 

https://www.history.com/topics/pre-history/why-did-the-dinosaurs-die-out-1

 

Not one mention about the little animals wiping them out. I just don't like it when fake news is made up no matter who does it. There is enough false information out on the internet already.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, robblok said:

I trust the scientific consensus on this topic, and that is they were wiped out by a meteor and more volcanic activity. 

 

https://www.history.com/topics/pre-history/why-did-the-dinosaurs-die-out-1

 

Not one mention about the little animals wiping them out. I just don't like it when fake news is made up no matter who does it. There is enough false information out on the internet already.

Just pulling your leg,but really as  there were no scientist's  there at

the time they are only guessing too,how do they explain the survival of

Turtles,Crocodilians,and the dinosaurs that lived to evolve into birds,

just lucky ?

regards Worgeordie

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...