Jump to content

OA insurance - the issues


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

So you say, but that lawyer at Integrity Legal is still convinced that this has already been decided to include all applicants applying for extensions (O and O-A) effective October 31.

 

That would be a very far reach beyond any rules/orders language Immigration has laid on the table thus far.

 

What might be lurking in the background for the future and as yet un-announced, who knows...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Max69xl said:

Have you even read the official police report?  It was issued in April. It clearly states that the insurance is only for new O-A Visa holders,starting October 31 2019. 

I've read a lot of things and I'm not going to get into this back and forth with you. I think we need to WAIT and see what happens starting next month to get some better clues about how this actually is going to be enforced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

That would be a very far reach beyond any rules/orders language Immigration has laid on the table thus far.

 

What might be lurking in the background for the future and as yet un-announced, who knows...

 

I'm glad you're confident. I'm not and I think it's folly for ANYONE to be at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I'm glad you're confident. I'm not and I think it's folly for ANYONE to be at this point. 

 

I'm not confident about anything.... I'm just reading what's in the actual documents that have surfaced, and struggling to understand what they're likely to mean.

 

All I know is, thus far, none of those documents reference regular O visas at all or anything about marriage extensions of stay.

 

That doesn't mean, however, that the authorities might not have some additional plans in the works...and some farang folks here happen to have heard or otherwise encountered details of what that might involve.  Or...maybe they're just speculating without any specific knowledge. Who knows....

 

 

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lupin said:

Oh come on man.. he's not your average Joe who just happens to have an opinion. He's someone who others will sit up and take notice of and someone who makes money on people sitting up and taking notice. Its irresponsible at best. That video will drum up so much business for him/them as a direct result of the fearmongering and confusion in his vid. We're just going to have to agree to disagree on the ethics of it.

So it's a conspiracy thing then, huh? I'm not saying he's right but I'm not as cynical as you are about his videos. I think he tries to sincerely give good information just as some of our experts here do. I can understand people hating on him because they don't LIKE his interpretations. I don't LIKE his interpretations. But even without his videos, I would find it unethical to broadcast total CERTAINTY about what these already done changes actually will mean until enough time passes so that we can SEE in real life what has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2019 at 8:41 AM, oznomad said:

OA visa holders often already have insurance that more than covers the requirements of 400k / 40k

You may be right but I will disagree with this based on my interaction.

In fact, of the people I have asked who are here in their 60's and 70's, I do not know personally of one other person who has insurance.  I do at a hefty Aetna premium.

 

To add, some are under the wrong impression Medicare will cover them here. 

 

400,000 is not a lot but some research I did shows it covers more then people may think depending on the hospital they choose.

 

Edited by bkk6060
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tanoshi said:

I spoke to the Immigration advice line on 1178 this morning.

I've just return from my local IO (around the corner) in Roi Et.

 

Both gave the identical answer to my questions, which were;

Q. If I have a current valid O-A Visa, or a last 1 year entry from an O-A Visa, that has now expired, is medical Insurance required to obtain an extension based on retirement.

A. If your applying for your very first extension after 31st October, (from a previous entry of an O-A Visa) then yes, proof of medical Insurance is required.

 

Q. If I previously held an O-A Visa, but have already been granted an extension based on retirement, is proof of medical Insurance required.

A. No, if any permission to stay from an O-A Visa entry has previously expired and you've already extended your permission to stay based on retirement, then medical Insurance is not required.

 

That now makes sense why it was included in internal Immigrations orders pertaining to criteria for extensions of stay.

Tanoshi,

 

   Great info....thanks.  However, after reading your post above and then the ensuring posts between you and ubonjoe I'm not sure I fully understand how the guidance you were given would apply to my situation.  So, let me pose my situation & question to you for your answer based on the info you received from immigration.

 

Situation:  I originally entered Thailand in Oct 2008 on an O-A Visa.  In Sep 2009 I went and got an retirement extension of stay.  That was my first retirement extension of stay and I'm now on my 11th retirement extension of stay that originally started off with my O-A visa back in 2008 as mentioned.  My current retirement extension of stay is good till early Oct 2020. 

 

So, based on my situation come Sep 2020 when I apply to renew my retirement extension of stay will insurance be a requirement for me since I originally started off with an OA visa back in 2008?   

 

My understanding from your post above is the answer is No....I would not require insurance.  But as mentioned as I read the ensuring posts from you and ubonjoe I'm no longer sure I'm correctly understanding what you described above.   Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time will tell... in the next few months, we should start seeing actual first-hand reports on whether it's only for new Non O-A visas or whether it applies to those who are applying for an extension who had (pre-Oct 31) O-A visas or whether it will also be applied to those who are applying for extensions (retirement) who previously had Non-O visas. Will hope for the best for everyone's sake...

Edited by BertM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Pib said:

So, based on my situation come Sep 2020 when I apply to renew my retirement extension of stay will insurance be a requirement for me since I originally started off with an OA visa back in 2008? 

No Insurance required.

You've already extended your permission of stay from a 1 year entry of an O-A Visa.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tanoshi said:

No Insurance required.

You've already extended your permission of stay from a 1 year entry of an O-A Visa.

 

I would however suggest you ask your local IO ahead of time just to be sure as there have been reports that some places say differently.  And post here what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should have high deductible health insurance like 250K BHT. Put the money in the bank and then buy a meaningful insurance with at least twovmillion coverage. Coverage does not begin untill you have used up your deductible.

 

In the USA. it is called catastrophic insurance. It comes with a tax deductible HSA account  with its own master card. You tax deductible money in HSA account within IRS limit. The ACA laws mandated no limit. Hopever, recently Trump has removed the no limit mandate but those insruance cant be sold in ACA exchange. 

It does not have any restirctions about US residency. But Outside USA one can only visit hospital for emergency only

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this is being misinterpreted.

Q. If I previously held an O-A Visa, but have already been granted an extension based on retirement, is proof of medical Insurance required.

A. No, if any permission to stay from an O-A Visa entry has previously expired and you've already extended your permission to stay based on retirement, then medical Insurance is not required.

Current permissions of stay do not require Medical Insurance. You will not need to rush out and buy Insurance. 'You have already extended and have a 'current' permission to stay'. That is your 'Current' permission. Not future permission when you extend again.

Edited by Lovethailandelite
Pronunciation
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sheryl said:

I would however suggest you ask your local IO ahead of time just to be sure as there have been reports that some places say differently.  And post here what they say.

My serving immigration office is CW (Bangkok).  Since my extension of stay is good thru early Oct 2020 I'm sure my answer will come from folks applying for extension of stay at CW with an old O-A as the basis for the extensions.  That answer should become clear in Nov when the order is in full effect and we start getting reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lupin said:

I agree entirely... which is why they should not have made the video at all

From his appearance and the haphazard nature of his presentation (reaching for words, admitting he doesn't read or speak Thai, and flipping back and forth through a bunch of loose pieces of paper) I am reluctant to put much faith in this lawyer's interpretations. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever immigration has implemented, I think they would soon find out it is not adequate and loophole exists to avoid it. Then they will start making more changes.

 

1. Assume it only applies to O-A and no extension at all.

People will start changing their visa type by leaving the country and entering on a visa exemept and then changing to Non-O/extrnsion inside Thailand. It is a no brainer. And if Thai immigration has indeed assume the law to be same as 1 above, then it will reinforce my beleif that Thais are least inteligent people on earth.

Edited by onera1961
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2019 at 12:50 PM, blackcabsaid:

 

Work permit holders that work in businesses and pay Social Fund contributions are coveredby the Thai Social Fund system, the same as Thai citizens.

 

I would imagine that work permit holders in this category world be the last tobe requiredto have insurance as the Thai government already covers them.

 

I'm not entirely sure if teachers with work permits are covered in the same way however.

I am fully covered by the Thai SS System as a Non O Retirement Visa holder.  My medical costs run in the $1,000/month range after a severe motorcycle accident in Thailand in 2013 that forced me to stop working full-time.  There is a PRIVATE SS fund you can make the SAME payments you did as a WP holder and it covers me just as it did when I was the MD of my companies.  I do not know if they will allow SS system fund coverage tobe used, but if it doesn't, looks like I am gone from LOS next June 2020.  Even my mother-in-law only has one problem at 73 years old, slightly high blood pressure.  She is Thai, and CANNOT obtain Thai healthcare coverage.  Another crazy demand from us retirees that makes No sense. Prayutdoesn't know how to create an economy, so he just increases taxes and rates on everything. 

 

I have been covered for 6+ years under SS Private fund.  I'm not going to go out and buy more insurance.  I have a Thai SS Insurance card, and it pays far more than any healthcare plan would. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s really not that difficult.

 

1st read this - it has pictures! Check against what you have in your passport, then read it again.

 

https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1102516-mandatory-health-insurance-for-over-50s-in-thailand-only-affects-those-on-non-immigrant-visa-o-a/

 

2nd read this - But only if you are sure you are “non-immigrant visa o-a”. You can understand what, who and how are trying to make money off you. And yes, good luck obtaining that foreign insurance certificate, and having it accepted by Immigration.

 

https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1127990-mandatory-health-insurance-due-for-long-stay-tourists/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, blackcab said:
[mention=198985]PunkRockerGuy[/mention] That's a good point. Those individuals who elected to carry on paying for Thai Social Fund payments after holding a work permit should also be covered.
 
I wonder if the government will accept this.

No process for doing so at present. I doubt it even occurred to the people who developed the police order.

Now, someone could certainly try presenting proof of SS cover (a letter from SS office) instead of the mandated insurance certificate. Depending on the IO, this might or might not work. You would likely need to discuss with the senior officer (who have some discretionary powers) and it can be hard in many places to get past the gate keepers/ front office staff.

Sent from my SM-J701F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lovethailandelite said:

I believe this is being misinterpreted.

Q. If I previously held an O-A Visa, but have already been granted an extension based on retirement, is proof of medical Insurance required.

A. No, if any permission to stay from an O-A Visa entry has previously expired and you've already extended your permission to stay based on retirement, then medical Insurance is not required.

Current permissions of stay do not require Medical Insurance. You will not need to rush out and buy Insurance. 'You have already extended and have a 'current' permission to stay'. That is your 'Current' permission. Not future permission when you extend again.

It wasn't misinterpreted, I even wrote dated examples out.

The permission to stay for 1 year from an O-A visa and permission to stay from an extension based on retirement are different, in that they are given for different reasons.

One is subject to the conditions set by the type of valid Visa, the other is subject to the conditions set by the local Immigration rules.

 

The examples were thus.

O-A issued and entry Jan 2018, with a second entry Jan 2019 with permission to stay until Jan 2020.

In that scenario the very first extension of permission to stay based on retirement will be effective after 31st October, therefore Insurance will be requested.

O-A issued and entry Jan 2017, with a second entry Jan 2018 with permission to stay granted until Jan 2019.

In Jan 2019 you extended your permission to stay based on the requirements and criteria set out in Police orders.

In Jan 2020 no Insurance is requested because you previously extended on the basis of retirement before the amendment became effective on 31st Oct 2019.

 

Those were the examples and the answers I previously posted to the above question.

 

We will have to wait until after October 31st to see whom and under what criteria is affected for a definitive answer, but I'd guess as usual we'll have different offices with different interpretations.

 

I can still interpret it with two different meanings, even after the explanation I received.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...