Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Cassava farmers protest Paraquat ban

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Matzzon said:

Ask yourself why other countries already banned these chemicals many years ago?

in paraquats  case because it was being used for suicide, the main cause of deaths.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Chazar said:

Christ Im seeing the  full wrath of a  fruitcake..................

I would appriciate if you do not feel the need to call me different degrading things, and keep to the discussion instead.
 

Quote

so no staff = dont grow  food ok,  good  plan.

Yes, kind of like a factory producing that can not use environmental och health endangering product in their production.

The same factory can produce and serve 450 custormers with only family members and ownership. If they want to make more money and higher production they have to emplot staff.

A factory is a business, same like farming is a business, Just in Thailand that small and medium farming is not registered as one.

Never said don´t grow, but you have to start see it out of a business perspective.

 

Edited by Matzzon
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Chazar said:

in paraquats  case because it was being used for suicide, the main cause of deaths.

In the west they added a vomiting agent and several other safeguard so hardly a good reason to ban it if it was that good. 

Edited by Tayaout
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Chazar said:

in paraquats  case because it was being used for suicide, the main cause of deaths.

Pretty sure that was not the reason. That due to there are other same effective substances still available. Like we should soon see a ban on sleeping pills and valium.

Edited by Matzzon
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joel Salatin explain well the issue with farmer that believe petrochemical marketing push. Their obstination to resist change and thinking outside the box keep them poor. 

Edited by Tayaout
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, webfact said:

Vashira asked the deputy minister to stop claiming that the chemical is dangerous to people and citing incorrect information from Non-Government Organisations (NGOs).

And all the information gained from all the other countries around the globe who have investigated, tested, submitted detailed health reports and banned it on the evidence that it is dangerous are all wrong?

Thainess at it's finest!

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, farmerjo said:

No it was because of ill informed people like yourself thinking your doing the world a favour.

 

Stupid argument, the experts don't know it you know better. While you have a big benefit from it. I would say your as trustworth as the chemical companies who sell the stuff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, robblok said:

Stupid argument, the experts don't know it you know better. While you have a big benefit from it. I would say your as trustworth as the chemical companies who sell the stuff. 

The facts are it is used in nearly the double amount of countries than it's not.

The facts are there must be a lot of mental health issues in the countries that it has been banned.(mostly EU countries)

The facts are it is being phased out in countries as suitable replacements are found.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tayaout said:

Joel Salatin explain well the issue with farmer that believe petrochemical marketing push. Their obstination to resist change and thinking outside the box keep them poor. 

Exactly. The low income society in Thailand is built on: "I´ve been doing like this all the time, and I have no clue how to change that"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

Exactly. The low income society in Thailand is built on: "I´ve been doing like this all the time, and I have no clue how to change that"

He is referring mainly about the US farmers but the principle remains the same everywhere. 

Edited by Tayaout
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

The low income society in Thailand

The EU banned these chemicals and cannot grow enough food for their demand.

Now they want 3rd world countries to supply clean,green food cheap so it's not to expensive for their consumers,at somchai's expense.

Somchai has turned around and said i can do that at long as you find me a way that doesn't hurt my very short pockets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to take away things that we think benefit us once we realize there is something dangerous about them. That's why the environmentalists face so much anger from those who have grown accustom to environmentally unfriendly things that make their lives easier and better. It's a human reaction. Try taking smartphones away from kids. Even cigarettes and alcohol linger on despite killing millions. Most farmers in Thailand really have no future because they just have too little land for what they grow. Half of the present number farming will be gone in 30 years with their land sold to others who can easily handle more land with the tech that is available. You can't live on 10-20 rai of rice land these days. Although some have much more rai, there are plenty who hold onto that little bit of land getting by doing odd jobs. Their kids have all left for the cities, and those kids also help their farmer parents. For many, just being able to say they have a patch of rice land they get their own rice from has become more about pride than any profit. To make a living off so little land, a person really has to be creative and have a green thumb for growing things other than cassava and rice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I came on to enlighten the non farmers why chemicals used in there right way are a very good tool for farmers.

In the article they pass all the required criteria,regulations of using the non selective herbicide.

I know i haven't won any friends on this subject but i bet a lot more non farming people who have read through the subject actually know now why it was banned in countries and will be banned in more.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, farmerjo said:

You did not bring one bit of substance here to the article in facts.

My plants are growing and need oxygen to thrive and your taking that away from them.

Your plants need CO2 and the govt and this person is contributing plenty lol 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...