Jump to content

Absolute latest from Immigration on Insurance...


Recommended Posts

Yes it's way to early to say anything definitive about actual enforcement policies in any office.
It isn't even 31 October yet!
Exactly! Until then, just read the published regulations.

All these speculations based on "what if", "maybe", "he said", "she said", etc., accomplish nothing except spreading FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt).
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Well OK, but without ever having that base visa for retirement (O or O-A) whether recent or many years old, there would have never been any basis for an extension. Personally I think this hair splitting over terminology on this issue has become tedious and silly. It doesn't change anything either way for how the enforcement of the health insurance requirement turns out.

I think it is the constant reminder from posters on this forum that we aren't extending our visa, the visa is expired, is part of what is causing a lot of confusion.

 

The O-A visa is a temporary stay visa. The extensions we get are extensions of that temporary stay visa.

 

The TM.7 asks "Type of Visa"
What are people entering on that TM.7 line for type of visa?

Personally I enter Non-Immigrant O-A. My O-A had an enter by date and has never been stamped as used like tourist visas are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KeeTua said:

I think it is the constant reminder from posters on this forum that we aren't extending our visa, the visa is expired, is part of what is causing a lot of confusion.

 

The O-A visa is a temporary stay visa. The extensions we get are extensions of that temporary stay visa.

 

The TM.7 asks "Type of Visa"
What are people entering on that TM.7 line for type of visa?

Personally I enter Non-Immigrant O-A. My O-A had an enter by date and has never been stamped as used like tourist visas are.

Yes I've mentioned that before. You're always required to write the base visa type you originally had on the retirement extension applications. O or O-A. But however we describe the fine points of what extensions actually are, I seriously doubt the enforcing immigration officers are having the same discussions. They already know all about original visas and extensions. What is still unclear now are the specific enforcement policies of the specific offices for the new health insurance requirement. So in my view expats arguing about these fine point theories about what extensions technically are or aren't are basically pointless mental masturbation. 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kind of interesting that we're now about one week before the formal start of the O-A insurance requirement, and at least as of today, neither the Thai Embassy in Wash DC nor the Thai Consulate in L.A. have updated their O-A web pages to make any mention of the insurance requirement, or what kind of documentation they'll want to see.

 

The London Embassy has... but its O-A insurance blurb says absolutely nothing about what kind of policy documentation they will accept:

 

Quote

Copy of evidence stating that applicants have insurance as stipulated by the Office of Insurance Commission and health insurance of Thailand which has insurance coverage for outpatient not less than 40,000 Baht and for inpatient not less than 400,000 Baht. Please check http://longstay.tgia.org> for more information regarding the insurance requirement. 

 

http://www.thaiembassy.org/london/en/services/7742/84508-Non-Immigrant-visas.html#7

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

The London Embassy has... but its O-A insurance blurb says absolutely nothing about what kind of policy documentation they will accept:

What is needed will probably appear when a person tries to apply for a OA visa on the online application site those in the UK. 

There is nothing about insurance on the site about insurance yet. See: https://thaievisa.go.th/Home/LongStay

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

It's kind of interesting that we're now about one week before the formal start of the O-A insurance requirement, and at least as of today, neither the Thai Embassy in Wash DC nor the Thai Consulate in L.A. have updated their O-A web pages to make any mention of the insurance requirement, or what kind of documentation they'll want to see.

 

The London Embassy has... but its O-A insurance blurb says absolutely nothing about what kind of policy documentation they will accept:

 

 

http://www.thaiembassy.org/london/en/services/7742/84508-Non-Immigrant-visas.html#7

 

The Chicago Embassy has updated it's website requiring insurance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, flexomike said:

The Chicago Embassy has updated it's website requiring insurance

 

 

Quote

 

**Additional requirement for Non-immigrant Visa “O-A” (for retirement long stay) application

As of 31 October 2019, visa applicant for Non-Immigrant Visa “O-A” (for retirement long stay) must have health insurance which covers the whole period of stay in Thailand.

Details of the requirement for health insurance are as follows:

  • For In-patient: health insurance policy must have coverage at least 400,000 Thai Baht per policy year.
  • For Out-patient: health insurance policy must have coverage at least 40,000 Thai Baht per policy year.

In addition to the existing required documents, visa applicant for Non-Immigrant Visa “O-A” (for retirement long stay) must furnish a completed“Insurance Certificate” as attached, as well as an original health insurance policy. A copy of the health insurance policymay only be accepted, provided that the applicant purchases the health insurance from participating Thai insurance companies as listed here http://longstay.tgia.org/.

 

 

http://www.thaiconsulatechicago.org/pages-non-immigrant-visa-eng.html

 

This text above, repeated for highlight below, is the kind of specific documentation guidance I've been trying to find from any of the Thai MFA folks in the U.S.

 

Quote

visa applicant for Non-Immigrant Visa “O-A” (for retirement long stay) must furnish a completed “Insurance Certificate” as attached, as well as an original health insurance policy. A copy of the health insurance policy may only be accepted, provided that the applicant purchases the health insurance from participating Thai insurance companies as listed here http://longstay.tgia.org/.

 

It looks like they're saying, as expected, if you wanna use a U.S. based policy, you're gonna have to get the MoPH type certificate signed by your U.S. insurer, in addition to providing an original copy of the policy itself.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

It looks like they're saying, as expected, if you wanna use a U.S. based policy, you're gonna have to get the MoPH type certificate signed by your U.S. insurer, in addition to providing an original copy of the policy itself.

Or said another way, the Thai govt has made it practically impossible for a foreign policy to be accepted because no insurance company is going to sign a MoPH foreign insurance certificate saying the company has insured the person in accordance with a Thai govt resolution XYZ.  This effectively forces a person to use one of the Thai insurance companies listed on the TGIA website.   TIT.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the form is unclear in terms of how many insurance company names/signatures are required.  

 

Does two Director names need to be entered and then one additional signature.  Or are they looking for "three names and three signatures from the insurance company? 

 

You can bet the Thai General Insurance Assn (TGIA) constructed the form for the MoPH....constructed it in such a way they knew that no foreign insurance company would ever sign such a document.

 

http://longstay.tgia.org/document/overseas_insurance_certificate.pdf

image.png.2eced9525381b563cc8f8fa734884df7.png

Edited by Pib
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, the above language from the Chicago Consulate also does NOT seem to incorporate the idea from the TGIA website (quoted below) that foreign policies would only be accepted for the "first year"...

 

Though it has never been entirely clear to me whether the TGIA wording means first year of the new insurance regime (and never after that), or first year of the particular O-A visa being issued (in other words, the initial year of each potentially two-year O-A period). Though it's apparent meaning in regular English would seem to mean just for the coming first year, and not ever after that.

 

Quote

First year, all applicants can buy health insurance from insurance companies in their owned countries or authorized insurance company in Thailand. When the applicants want to renew the visa, the applicants must buy insurance from authorized insurance companies in Thailand only.

 

Either way, the Chicago Consulate O-A insurance language seems to omit any mention of any "first year" limitation.

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, the above language from the Chicago Consulate also does NOT seem to incorporate the idea from the TGIA website (quoted below) that foreign policies would only be accepted for the "first year"...
 
Though it has never been entirely clear to me whether the TGIA wording means first year of the new insurance regime (and never after that), or first year of the particular O-A visa being issued (in other words, the initial year of each potentially two-year O-A period). Though it's apparent meaning in regular English would seem to mean just for the coming first year, and not ever after that.
 
First year, all applicants can buy health insurance from insurance companies in their owned countries or authorized insurance company in Thailand. When the applicants want to renew the visa, the applicants must buy insurance from authorized insurance companies in Thailand only.
 
Either way, the Chicago Consulate O-A insurance language seems to omit any mention of any "first year" limitation.
 
Not so sure. Wouldn't renewals mean extensions in Thailand. Why would embassies and consulates even bother to address that.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Not so sure. Wouldn't renewals mean extensions in Thailand. Why would embassies and consulates even bother to address that.

 

Lots of folks get an O-A for almost a two-year duration, and then sometime during that period, go back to the home country and reapply for another O-A, and so on and so forth.... In part because it avoids having the requirements about bringing money into the country. But also because some folks live in the U.S. part year and then in Thailand part year.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Lots of folks get an O-A for almost a two-year duration, and then sometime during that period, go back to the home country and reapply for another O-A, and so on and so forth.... In part because it avoids having the requirements about bringing money into the country. But also because some folks live in the U.S. part year and then in Thailand part year.
 
Of course but from the embassy / consulate POV that is completely new application! Not by any stretch of the imagination a renewal.

Of course the reentry at the airport to get an additional year could be described as a renewal.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

But also because some folks live in the U.S. part year and then in Thailand part year.

For them the Thai insurance policies Ts&Cs may not be met? So how would it solve anything....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Of course but from the embassy / consulate POV that is completely new application! Not by any stretch of the imagination a renewal.

 

I think the point was... folks will be applying for new O-A visas a year from now (or maybe not...) And from reading the Chicago Consulate's info, there's nothing that would seem to bar them from applying with a U.S. health insurance policy -- provided they could get their insurer to sign the MoPH certificate.  Which would be a different version from what TGIA is seeming to say.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Of course but from the embassy / consulate POV that is completely new application! Not by any stretch of the imagination a renewal.

Of course the reentry at the airport to get an additional year could be described as a renewal.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

40 pages of rubbish. The reentry to trigger 2nd year is not a rewnal.

O-A has life of 12 month. The next year if you choose to exit and reenter prior to expire date if O-A you have permission of stay for ~ 12 month. Leave and wish reenter in that period you will require reentry permit.

Then upon next out/in you are not using your OA . Your using reentry permit. Same as folk on extensions. 

To the folk entered years back on an O-A and been on extension relax. You are NOT extending your O-A. 

Your living in los on permission of stay. Heck you may have married since and now on extensions ME.

Such a stupid thread for 40 pages.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

To the folk entered years back on an O-A and been on extension relax. You are NOT extending your O-A. 

Your living in los on permission of stay.

Immigration disagrees.

 

From Immigration Bureau website 'Visa Extension':

Home > Service  > Visa Extension > Visa Extension - In the case of retirement

 

The alien:
(1) Must have been granted a non-immigrant visa (NON-IM).

https://www.immigration.go.th/content/service_22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, KeeTua said:

Immigration disagrees.

 

From Immigration Bureau website 'Visa Extension':

Home > Service  > Visa Extension > Visa Extension - In the case of retirement

 

The alien:
(1) Must have been granted a non-immigrant visa (NON-IM).

https://www.immigration.go.th/content/service_22

Its just the same as farang saying that they are living here on retirement visa. No such thing. 

Visas cannot be extended. The ongoing permission of stay can be extended. For example I enter los on a non o based on marriage valid for 90 days then I apply for 12 month permission of stay based on marriage. The following year I apply for permission of stay based on retirement. Followed the next year as being parent of Thai child. Which visa am I extending. I do not have a valid visa. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2019 at 8:15 PM, ubonjoe said:

I don't think so.

The 2nd year is covered in the last memo in the English version for those issued after the 31st. On entry to the country you must have insurance valid for the entire year of the last entry.

hello ubonjoe i just ckeck my passport and it show that befor i get my extention mariage i have a non OA VISA do you think the insurance applie to me,thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You're just playing runaround games now.

The O-A visa gives you a one year entry.

As long as that visa is valid, every time you enter you get a NEW one year entry.

I'm sorry -- that CAN be a kind of renewal. 

The context here is HEALTH INSURANCE.

When people enter with their still valid O-A visas to get a NEW one year stay, what kind of health insurance proof (or none) are they going to be required to show to the border agent?

 

Also extensions are commonly called renewals. Precise language or not, they are. In fact immigration officers often say that.

 

Now let's be clear OK? I have no investment in the word RENEWAL. In fact, I don't like it at all. It's incredibly AMBIGUOUS.


So WHY have I been discussing it here? Because this text was pasted from the Chicago consulate:

 


Not my fault. That is THEIR language. So what is your reading of what the Chicago consulate means there by RENEWAL? 

 

Jing, the excerpt you quoted in this post of yours above -- which came from a prior post of mine -- was not language from the Chicago Consulate.

 

It was language from the TGIA O-A insurance website, which I had posted to compare/contrast with the language used by the Chicago Consulate.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, no deal said:

hello ubonjoe i just ckeck my passport and it show that befor i get my extention mariage i have a non OA VISA do you think the insurance applie to me,thank you

i start whit a NON OA visa ,i change for a retirement visa and change again for a mariage extention when i got maried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

ubonjoe i know you for longtime in this forum and you all way give good advice,i want to ask you about something, i read every where on the internet: farang are just tolere in thailand

i live there for 11 years and i never feel that,what you have to said about that? thank you.

 

1 hour ago, no deal said:

Thank you you have a good day good job!

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...