Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Senior army man denies trying to murder "pretties" in their car

Recommended Posts

Interesting that he knows that the gun used was his gun and that somehow he sold the gun used a long time ago????? Time travel proven or more Thai incredible excuses to explain away fault. I guess any excuse is better than none

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how does he know what gun was used in the attack, if he was not involved?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They must have read the reply's on the topic before , hence the explaining of the word "PRETTIES" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Matzzon said:

And as an army guy, he do not realize the importance of changing the owner name on the weapon. I guess he had the best instructor in the world, or that he´s just thick as a brick. Another assumption would of course be, that the man might be telling some lies.

Soldiers do not keep up with the civilian laws regarding the transfer of firearms. But you are right, as a gun owner, as a man deemed to be intelligent enough to reach his rank, and as anyone with any sense, he should have known to document any forearm transfer. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"There have been claims made elsewhere in the Thai media - and on the Facebook page of Manasvee - that the army man will try to use his influence to escape responsibility."  He's an enlisted soldier, his circle of influence is other enlisted personnel.  In other words, he has no influence. On top of that there are situations where your superiors are going to just advise you to bring your own rope; because, they are going to hang you. This is one of them.

Edited by kensisaket
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He obviously suffers from the sense of entitlement that carrying a firearm instills in the weak and insecure of the human race.

 

“I understand that you will soon be leavin' town

Don't try to call me when they finally run you down

Just give fair warning any time you come around

With a gun

 

With a gun

You will be what you are just the same”

 

Steely Dan  …. Circa; 1974

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, chama said:

Soldiers do not keep up with the civilian laws regarding the transfer of firearms. But you are right, as a gun owner, as a man deemed to be intelligent enough to reach his rank, and as anyone with any sense, he should have known to document any forearm transfer. 

Since when did possessing any level of intellectual quotient have anything to do with achieving the rank he reached 🤓🙏✌️😎

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, agudbuk said:

So did he name his friend?

A familiar story.  The friend's name was Noi and he doesn't know his real name or address but heard he has since returned to his home province.  No, he doesn't know which province that might be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Senior army man".  What? The guy is an NCO, not even an officer - a sergeant major 1st class and sergeant major doesn't mean what it means in the British army, i.e. only one company sergeant major per company and one regimental sergeant major per regiment.  It just means any time serving sergeant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chama said:

Soldiers do not keep up with the civilian laws regarding the transfer of firearms. But you are right, as a gun owner, as a man deemed to be intelligent enough to reach his rank, and as anyone with any sense, he should have known to document any forearm transfer. 

The Firearms Act says something like the provisions of this act do not apply to military and law enforcement officers using firearms in the course of their duties.  That exempts soldiers from needing permits for government owned firearms issued to them which they have to return to stores when not using on duty.  It doesn't permit them to carry unregistered firearms in public or discharge them at will.  I have a friend, a full general, who is a firearms enthusiast and he applies for permits every time he buys a new gun which is often. 

 

This sergeant's gun was obviously an unregistered one.   So he could not have registered the transfer, even if he really had sold it to someone, which is clearly not the case anyway.   

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, rkidlad said:

 

 

A very poorly written and confusing article.

 

Whether they were using their full beams or not, what does it matter? You don't go around shooting at people. This is a complete non-issue. 

 

Agreed on both counts but this full beam thing is a common cause of death in Thailand.  Someone was murdered in a similar case in Ubon (I think) a year or two ago.  The victim was shot dead with a shotgun a rural area by some trigger happy jerk who said he did it because he thought the guy had his full beams on which turned out not to be the case. 

 

After market light bulbs sold in Thailand are so bright that it is easy to get killed driving with them dipped.  One also has to be very careful not to put headlights on full beam by mistake without noticing.  Could be a death sentence.  What a country!

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, What gun? firstly the police had to bullet does the have a return address on it? Plus if it is him in the CCTV. He just happen to have a Black pick up, and was there at the time? How unlucky for him. and the friend happened to be in the neighborhood with the gun too! 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High beaming an idiot driver = risk of death I guess.

 

I usually don't high-beam so that I avoid the risk of idiotic break-checking, but jesus, who would kill someone for high-beaming -- even if the high-beaming was from some other idiot ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An the black pickup?  That was sold to the same dead friend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A professional would have finished them off , now he has 2 witness

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...