Jump to content

Paraquat ban could cost Bt570 billion, warn academics


Recommended Posts

Paraquat ban could cost Bt570 billion, warn academics

By The Nation

 

800_1824ad946f33529.jpeg

 

Millions of sugarcane farmers and some academics have voiced opposition to the ban on farm chemicals paraquat and glyphosate, saying the discontinuation of these substances can cost the sugar industry as much as Bt570 billion.

 

 

Thongkam Cheongklad, chairman of the Sugarcane Farmers Association, said if paraquat – a chemical used to control weeds – is prohibited, it will have a significant impact on the cost of production for farmers. It has also been reported that the substitution for paraquat is quite expensive and may not be as effective. 

 

He said some 1.2 million people involved in the sugar industry in the Central, North, East and Northeast regions are opposed to the ban on the two chemicals. 

 

Kitti Choonhawong, president of the Thailand Society of Sugarcane Technologists said sugarcane plantations cover about 11 million rai nationwide and generate as much as Bt300 billion annually. He added that the ban of the two chemicals may lower the production of sugar, which will have an impact on sugar factories and export, accounting for losses of as much as Bt570 billion. 

 

He also said that the export market may lose as much as Bt94.6 billion, as Thailand is second only to Brazil as the world’s leading sugar exporter. 

 

Viroj Na Ranong, research director at Thailand Development Research Institute, warned that if Thai sugar farmers are no longer allowed to use chemical pesticides and chemical fertilisers, the country will not be able to produce enough food for consumption. 

 

However, he said, if chemical pesticides are banned but chemical fertilisers still allowed, then there may be enough food for domestic consumption, though the cost of production will rise as more labour will be required and the cost of labour is very high. 

 

“The government has to implement measures based on research, not on social trends and politics,” he noted.

 

The National Hazardous Substances Committee is scheduled to meet on October 27 to decide on whether the use of three toxic farming chemicals -- paraquat, glyphosate and chlorpyrifos – should be banned.

 

The panel set up by the government had proposed to end the use of the three chemicals from December 1, as they are considered to be harmful to people’s health and cause soil contamination.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30377543

 

logo2.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-10-19

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GalaxyMan said:

Why are these jerks only worried about money that they might lose? Why are they so unconcerned with the lives that will be ended by continuing the use of this known poison? How can people be so totally retarded? ????

Because they are Thai with no regard to anyone but themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

He added that the ban of the two chemicals may lower the production of sugar, which will have an impact on sugar factories and export,

The government plans to introduce a tax on sugar used in the beverage industry so it is likely less sugar will need to be grown anyway.

The high baht will automatically kill sugar exports. So the sugar industry is not looking good regardless of whether they use toxic chemicals or not.

The less sugar planted/grown means less smoke and haze which must be a health plus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GalaxyMan said:

This attitude is not unique to Thailand. There was the same noise in the USSA when they banned it there.

Same noises made in many countries due to the extraordinary influence of the powerful chemical lobbies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sugar industry in Thailand including the land used to grow cane is mostly Chinese owned and operated. China will do what ever it can to keep using the cheapest options no matter what the cost to health and environment. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, that´s interesting! With the right promotion and raising the price 50 satang per kilo. They will surely be expected to regain their losses in only a few years, as well as beeing recognized as have evironmental and health friendy production in the eyes of the rest of the world.

In the end, I actually think they win and save lifes at the same time. Not a bad idea! Let´s say "Sugar & Cassava - Food for thoughts"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't they try sugar beets in the north parts of Thailand, with some adjustments ( plant and shades) it would be possible and we also the burning problem would be less

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SoilSpoil said:

As sugarcane farmers burn their crops before harvesting, damaging the environment and health of millions of people, banning these chemicals will save society trillions of bahts in health care. 

But, but  a few guys are making a lot of money selling the $#!t, can't let them down, now can we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/19/2019 at 7:12 AM, rooster59 said:

Millions of sugarcane farmers and some academics have voiced opposition to the ban on farm chemicals paraquat and glyphosate, saying the discontinuation of these substances can cost the sugar industry as much as Bt570 billion.

because they are experts in the dangers of these chemicals

or profits before health of the consumers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/19/2019 at 7:12 AM, rooster59 said:

Kitti Choonhawong, president of the Thailand Society of Sugarcane Technologists said sugarcane plantations cover about 11 million rai nationwide and generate as much as Bt300 billion annually. He added that the ban of the two chemicals may lower the production of sugar, which will have an impact on sugar factories and export, accounting for losses of as much as Bt570 billion. 

Why do figures in these reports never seem to add up?

If the industry generates 300 billion, how can potential losses be nearly double that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...