Sujo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Be interesting if Bolton gives evidence. All this talk of being an illegal investigation is just a load of covfefe. The dems are following the law and house rules. Note repubs are not saying anything about the evidence. Just smoke and mirrors. Whilst the dems along with repubs in the investigation are just getting on with their sworn duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Be interesting if Bolton gives evidence. All this talk of being an illegal investigation is just a load of covfefe. The dems are following the law and house rules. Note repubs are not saying anything about the evidence. Just smoke and mirrors. Whilst the dems along with repubs in the investigation are just getting on with their sworn duty.Yep.They can't handle the evidence. Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkshire Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 9 minutes ago, Sujo said: Be interesting if Bolton gives evidence. All this talk of being an illegal investigation is just a load of covfefe. The dems are following the law and house rules. Note repubs are not saying anything about the evidence. Just smoke and mirrors. Whilst the dems along with repubs in the investigation are just getting on with their sworn duty. The evidence is pretty clearcut and easy to understand. Trump knows the Dems have got him by the gonads. The Republicans are attacking the process because that's all they've got. Trump will be impeached. The only question is whether the Senate will convict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 A post using a trolling meme has been removed as well as a reply. A post containing a link to a late night comedy show and a reply has been removed. A late night comedy show is not a credible source of news. Other baiting posts, troll posts and the replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 10:05 AM, JHolmesJr said: And Adam Schiff is the universal symbol for truth....LOL But but but.....pathetic deflection but of course that is all you have left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 10:07 AM, Jingthing said: Someone to scapegoat. That's all they have now. Attack the process. Attack the witnesses. Facts are against them so they do not matter. Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app They still have the emojis. Make America Graphic Again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 On 10/24/2019 at 10:27 AM, bristolboy said: Just the little matter that the facts of his career don't tally with what is known about the whistleblower. Lol , as if facts matter to Trump's little sheepies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 21 hours ago, Guitarzan said: Yea, it boggles the mind as to why Trump doesn’t believe the intelligence agencies— like Mueller, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstien. I just can’t figure that out! Just doesn’t make sense, there is no reason whatsoever Trump shouldn’t trust them. Trump doesn't trust anybody and only tolerates those who suck up to him , pathetic , cowardly , bullying manchild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Berkshire said: The evidence is pretty clearcut and easy to understand. Trump knows the Dems have got him by the gonads. The Republicans are attacking the process because that's all they've got. Trump will be impeached. The only question is whether the Senate will convict. "Trump will be Impeached" I hope so, for the sake of exposing transparency and the destructive dem hatred and lies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 21 hours ago, Guitarzan said: Bill Maher the Trump hating comedian? Trump , the human race hating wanabe dictator ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Alex Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Key parts of Taylor's testimony have been debunked: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467223-sondland-attorney-disputes-key-portions-of-taylor-testimony-report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieH Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 reported inflammatory remark removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Alex Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 9 hours ago, heybruce said: Are you unaware that Ukraine is at war with Russia and dependent on the US for support? Do you not consider that duress? Or do you need a reminder of what a baby Trump becomes whenever he is criticized? I think you raise an excellent question, which leads me to mine. If Trump is so owned by the Russians, why does he continue to provide them with aid and military equipment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 9 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said: I think you raise an excellent question, which leads me to mine. If Trump is so owned by the Russians, why does he continue to provide them with aid and military equipment? Because Congress has passed bills into laws maybe that grant Ukrraine aid. And if he attempted a veto, Congress would override him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Crazy Alex said: Key parts of Taylor's testimony have been debunked: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467223-sondland-attorney-disputes-key-portions-of-taylor-testimony-report Sondland’s attorney (ie Sondland) disputes testimony that puts Sondland at risk of prosecution for perjury. Imagine for a moment if contemporaneous reports of Sondland’s illegal behavior had been reported to the National Security Council lawyers Oops they were. An example of precisely why the Congressional Committees are right to conduct their investigation behind closed doors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 3 hours ago, Crazy Alex said: Key parts of Taylor's testimony have been debunked: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467223-sondland-attorney-disputes-key-portions-of-taylor-testimony-report All your link does is state that Sondland "does not recall" some of the phone conversations Taylor testified about. That does not debunk Taylor's sworn testimony, based on detailed notes and drawing on decades of experience in the State Department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Crazy Alex said: Interesting speculation. However, as Biden's extortion of Ukraine proved, it's easy to withhold aid to any given country when an administration chooses to do so. Biden didn't unilaterally withhold aid, he implemented the policy of the President with the support of Congress. Trump unilaterally withheld aid without consulting with anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sujo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Giuliani just admitted in a tweet that he acted solely for trump as his personal attorney re ukraine. Not as part of the state dept. Bye bye Rudy. And this now implicates trump acting in his personal interest and not for US interest. Just keeps getting better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 Troll posts and replies removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Sujo said: Giuliani just admitted in a tweet that he acted solely for trump as his personal attorney re ukraine. Not as part of the state dept. Bye bye Rudy. And this now implicates trump acting in his personal interest and not for US interest. Just keeps getting better. Constitutional Law Professor: In a Single Tweet, Rudy Giuliani Admitted to the ‘Highest of High Crimes’ "And yet Trump told Ukraine it had to dance to Rudy’s tune – a tune designed to advance Trump’s personal interests– in order to remain in the U.S.’s good graces (e.g., to secure access, aid, etc.),” wrote Lederman, a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. “This is the highest of high crimes–using the leverage of his position as chief diplomat to advance his own interests—and it’s hard to imagine anything more inconsistent w/Trump’s constitutional oath & duty and more revealing of his utter unfitness for office. And that’d be true *even if there were no quid pro quo* (but of course there was, which makes it all the worse).” https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/constitutional-law-professor-in-a-single-tweet-rudy-giuliani-admitted-to-the-highest-of-high-crimes/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted October 26, 2019 Share Posted October 26, 2019 5 hours ago, Sujo said: Giuliani just admitted in a tweet that he acted solely for trump as his personal attorney re ukraine. Not as part of the state dept. Bye bye Rudy. And this now implicates trump <snip> “Rudy who? I don’t know...Rudy was never my lawyer. I mean, he was my lawyer. Some say he was my lawyer, but he was not my lawyer. I haven’t talked to him in a long time. We spoke briefly yesterday... But he was not my lawyer. I take pictures with a lotta people. I have dinner with a lotta people. Lotta people came to my inauguration, biggest crowd in history, am I supposed to know all of ‘em? Are they all my lawyers?? Could be...I need a lotta lawyers, more than any president in history. What’re we talkin’ ‘bout again?” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.