Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Democrats release new batch of testimony from Trump impeachment inquiry

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

The invasion was certainly not because Matt Gaetz couldn’t find a better place to eat pizza. They did conjured up a reason that the American people deserve a public and open hearing. Now they got it. End of story but not for the republicans who continue to muddy the water with their idiosyncratic pranks.  

Now the hearings are going public we’ll hear a different whine (not just yet though, it hasn’t yet been distributed, but it’ll be along shortly).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw Trump with his daughter doing a TV chat show type interview.

He came across quite well, "If she wasn't my daughter I'd probably be dating her"

I like people who are able to make jokes about them-self.

 

Can't imagine many military dictators managing that.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, HuskerDo said:

Even a face lift or two can't fix stupid.

It's arrogance.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, johnnybangkok said:

You haven't posted any 'evidence'. All you post is whataboutism, deflections and debunked conspiracy theories. Your whole argument is that Trump had every right to ask the Ukraine about the Bidens and many, many people have tried to educate you (myself included) that no, that is a breach of campaign finance laws. We have seen sworn testimony from many people to include this article about Laura Cooper, deputy assistant secretary of defense testifying that "All of the senior leaders of the U.S. national security departments and agencies were all unified in their view that this assistance was essential," but also;-

 

Fiona Hill, former Russia expert for the National Security Council  Described a July 10 White House meeting with Ukrainian officials in which Gordon Sondland pressured Ukraine for a political investigation and insisted Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney had agreed to the plan. Following the meeting, Hill said John Bolton, the president’s national security adviser, told her to tell the president’s legal adviser “that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up.”

 

Michael McKinley, former senior adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he was disturbed by a push to use U.S. diplomatic missions "to procure negative political information for domestic purposes," as well as a "failure" at the State Department to support the American diplomatic corps.

 

Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union in a dramatic u-turn testified that he personally delivered the message on Sept. 1 to a top Ukrainian official that U.S. military aid was contingent upon the country’s ability to launch an investigation that Trump wanted after he “refreshed” his recollection.

 

Bill Taylor, U.S. charge d’affaires for Ukraine told Congress that "it was becoming clear" to him that a meeting between Trump and the Ukrainian President "was contingent upon the investigation of Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 elections,”

 

And last but not least, decorated army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, director of European affairs for the National Security Council- who was listening to the call - said he had “no doubt” that Trump was pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rival, according to the transcript. He also said he reported his concerns to the National Security Council’s top lawyer because he was so “concerned.”

 

So either ALL of these people are lying to congress and therefore committing perjury and risking up to 5 years in prison, their reputations and their careers or your boy is a cheating, conniving, back-dealing crook who was holding off $400 million in aid to the Ukraine unless they investigated a often debunked conspiracy theory concerning Biden and his son.

 

Now you are more than welcome to come back on this with your 'evidence' that you think we are all ignoring but having seen your numerous posts before, I'm not going to hold my breath for anything that is based on facts.

 

Source https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-testified-congress/story?id=66763043

You are losing your time. He is in propaganda mode and will post the same phony claim again in a few minutes or hours.

Edited by candide
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, howbri said:

Democrats are running a witch hunt and have been for 3 years as the hoax continues. Trump will win big at the polls next year with R's winning back the House of Rep. The corruption by the left knows no bounds but the American people, those that love their country, are all behind him. Just check out the ralllies  and compare them to the meager 2-300 that Biden and Crazy Bernie are getting. 

Soooo, how about the evidence.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Does anybody check if anybody out there changes his or her mind about Trump?

For many of us it's obvious since forever that he is lying all the time, enriching himself, and ignoring all the rules.

If the president co

uld be prosecuted like anybody else he would probably be already in jail - with not much chance of coming out anytime soon.

But then there are those people who ignore any evidence. They still support Trump and it seems there is nothing that would convince them that Trump should be removed.

More evidence for what? If people didn't get it until now why would they change their mind with new evidence? They believe in Trump like a religion. It's impossible to convince them with facts. 

You said it just wrong: "For many of us it's obvious......." Yeah man, that's the real evidence. Trump phobia.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, hugocnx said:

You said it just wrong: "For many of us it's obvious......." Yeah man, that's the real evidence. Trump phobia.

Did you follow the news (not fox "news") in the last couple of weeks? If yes, how can you possibly have any doubts that Trump tried to make a mafia style deal. You do me a favor and I do you a favor. And just in case someone asks you: No, that is not legal - and for good reason.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...