Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Democrats release new batch of testimony from Trump impeachment inquiry

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, sirineou said:

 yea I don't get it either. Today in an interview Nikki Haley said:

 

""Kelly and Tillerson confided in me that when they resisted the President, they weren't being insubordinate, they were trying to save the country," Haley wrote. "

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/10/politics/nikki-haley-tillerson-kelly-save-the-country-recruit-white-house/index.html

People in the administration , everyone coming out of the administration , that has nothing to gain from supporting trump, has a very unflattering opinion of him, and this Idiots ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I dont get why they don't see something that is plain as day. 

 

"Confided" ? So it must be true because these guys wouldn't lie, would they? Of course Nikki wouldn't have an axe to grind would she? A paragon of truth?  🤣🤣 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, riclag said:

 "criminal dictator ,illegal edicts"conspiracy theories! For your information the Senate was designed as a  check balance on the peoples house. Sen. Graham already has almost 50 gop members of the senate who agree that this is a house "dem" impeachment sham,while all of the gop house members are in line with the WH transcript that the Prez Z admitted several times no pressure no blackmail

The public hearings will change the math you are hanging your hopes on.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

I never said that I don't accept sworn testimony.  Where did I say that, Chomper?  I'm sure it won't take you as long to find the particular post as it did for Vindman to find where the quid pro quo was in the call text when asked by a Representative during his testimony.  Actually I'm setting you up.  You have all the time you want since Vindman hasn't found it yet so the clock hasn't stopped.

 

What I was arguing earlier was that testimony is not tantamount to established fact.  So you twist the facts and end up with I "don't accept sworn testimony."  See how that works?

 

This entire sham argument that Trump is guilty of quid pro quo follows exactly as what you have just illustrated.  Take facts, twist them into a pretzel shape of your biased choosing and viola!, Trump is guilty of something that never happened.  It's quite magical.  Unfortunately, it's dark magic.

Public hearings start tomorrow.

 

Enjoy.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...