Jump to content

'Shameful' of UK not to publish report on Russian meddling, says Hillary Clinton


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 hours ago, Thomas J said:

Boy is that the pot calling the kettle black.  These are just some of the instances that the USA has "meddled" in other peoples politics. 

Obama sent money from USA taxpayers to group in Israel to defeat Netanyahu

Obama bombed Lybia to oust  maammar gaddafi 
Bush sent troops to remove Saddam Hussein and installed U.S. backed government

Bush sent troops to Afghanistan and installed Hami Karzi

The U.S. installed Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, into power as head of Iran
The US installed Manuel Noriega into power in Panama
The U.S. installed Ngo Dinh Diem as president of South Vietnam 

The US backed Syngman Rhee as president of South Korea
The USA attempted a failed coup on Fidel Castro

Every major power spies on and interferes in the political process of both its allies and enemies.  From all that has been determined the "Russian meddling" was minimal and did not favor one candidate over another.  It was intended to sow discord and that they were successful in doing. 

 

I think the Ivans are somewhere in the background of Brexit. A weaker Europe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Yes.

 

But I don't want to see some bitter old corrupt hag from America openly interfering in British Politics whilst whining on about how wrong it is to interfere in American politics.

 

Hypocrisy of the left, as usual. Always "do as we say, not as we do". 

She’s not interfering, she’s making an open comment.

 

So when would you like to see the report?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Yes.

 

But I don't want to see some bitter old corrupt hag from America openly interfering in British Politics whilst whining on about how wrong it is to interfere in American politics.

 

Hypocrisy of the left, as usual. Always "do as we say, not as we do". 

Going by your argument, Boris Johnson shouldn’t comment that he side with the protestors in Hong Kong and shouldn’t even talk to them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Thomas J said:

Boy is that the pot calling the kettle black.  These are just some of the instances that the USA has "meddled" in other peoples politics. 

Obama sent money from USA taxpayers to group in Israel to defeat Netanyahu

Obama bombed Lybia to oust  maammar gaddafi 
Bush sent troops to remove Saddam Hussein and installed U.S. backed government

Bush sent troops to Afghanistan and installed Hami Karzi

The U.S. installed Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, into power as head of Iran
The US installed Manuel Noriega into power in Panama
The U.S. installed Ngo Dinh Diem as president of South Vietnam 

The US backed Syngman Rhee as president of South Korea
The USA attempted a failed coup on Fidel Castro

Every major power spies on and interferes in the political process of both its allies and enemies.  From all that has been determined the "Russian meddling" was minimal and did not favor one candidate over another.  It was intended to sow discord and that they were successful in doing. 

 

 

not to mention the latest russian asset, tulsi gabbard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who care for Chelsea Football Club , it may be worth pointing out to those sad souls that but for a good dollop of laundered Russian oligarch money from 2002 on, the club would still be languishing in the lower reaches of the English game.

 

No doubt Madam Schiff will announce during the impeachment sitcom about to be launched in Washington D.C. that Roman Abramovich lent Donald Trump a few million dollars to build a hotel in Siberia.  The loan, never to be repaid, was spent instead on the 2016 primaries.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Thomas J said:

Every major power spies on and interferes in the political process of both its allies and enemies.  From all that has been determined the "Russian meddling" was minimal and did not favor one candidate over another.  It was intended to sow discord and that they were successful in doing.

Even more reason to publish it then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson and his most senior adviser, Dominic Cummings, have links to Russia.

 

So what? Why on earth should the the Russians conspire to put Boris and the Tories - staunch allies of the US and NATO - back in power?

 

In their shoes, I'd want Corbyn and his neo-Marxist mates running the show. They make no secret of wanting to scrap Trident, our only deterrent against a missile attack. 

 

The clincher is that Red Jeremy is on record as stating that no matter what happens, he will NEVER press our nuclear button.

 

Thank you, comrade - and good luck at the polls!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Krataiboy said:

Johnson and his most senior adviser, Dominic Cummings, have links to Russia.

 

So what? Why on earth should the the Russians conspire to put Boris and the Tories - staunch allies of the US and NATO - back in power?

 

In their shoes, I'd want Corbyn and his neo-Marxist mates running the show. They make no secret of wanting to scrap Trident, our only deterrent against a missile attack. 

 

The clincher is that Red Jeremy is on record as stating that no matter what happens, he will NEVER press our nuclear button.

 

Thank you, comrade - and good luck at the polls!

 

 

Here’s an idea, the government publishes the report and we can all stop guessing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, blazes said:

For those who care for Chelsea Football Club , it may be worth pointing out to those sad souls that but for a good dollop of laundered Russian oligarch money from 2002 on, the club would still be languishing in the lower reaches of the English game.

 

No doubt Madam Schiff will announce during the impeachment sitcom about to be launched in Washington D.C. that Roman Abramovich lent Donald Trump a few million dollars to build a hotel in Siberia.  The loan, never to be repaid, was spent instead on the 2016 primaries.

 

 

Are you playing scrabble or are you simply scattering anything you can think of into a single post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, 3NUMBAS said:

sore loser still banging on about the mythical russian bogeyman ..all voters would have to be brainwashed to be taken  in by her daft ideas about russians in the closet

Not at all mythical.
 

Quote

 

Read the declassified report on Russian interference in the U.S. election

The declassified 14-page report, which was released in January, concluded Russian President Vladi­mir Putin ordered the effort to undermine faith in the U.S. presidential election and helped Trump win the White House.

 

 

 

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/read-the-declassified-report-on-russian-interference-in-the-us-election/2433/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

I think Boris has concluded the report harms him. Any other reason not to publish?

 

Maybe (?) he is planning to release it, when it does most damage? A week before the election? We are all assuming it harms the "leave campaign" but is there something else in it?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...