Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

Prince Andrew says he has no recollection of meeting Epstein accuser

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, madmen said:

He is Royalty and untouchable and he knows it

If the truth regarding the web of pedophilia and it's ties to Satanism comes to light even his Royalty will not protect him.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sillyfool said:

i did not have sexual relations with that woman...... o wait.

A reference to Bill Clinton; I think. Well Clinton didn't have a relationship with Monica. Just an encounter.

Edited by owl sees all
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh...finally after attempting to divert us from, this by the poor Megan stories, he does an interview with Maitlis.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/16/prince-andrew-what-is-the-excuse-for-this-misogynistic-nonsense-served-up-in-a-gilded-chamber

 

Didn't know this; a cause for concern, in light of these *ahem* allegations....?

 

"this proud patron of the NSPCC believes this substitutes for giving a <deleted> about Epstein’s victims."

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgement was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable but that's just the way it is."

Personally, I wouldn't proclaim myself as being honorable, it's just not an honorable thing to do..., I'm just too modest to do that. :tongue:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things that always disturbs me about underage sex and the like is that it depends on where you are. 16 is the age of consent in the UK, whereas it is 18 in the US. If it happened in the UK then obviously it would be unseemly, but not criminal. In the US it is statutory rape whether consensual or not.

 

Having said that, this was a PR disaster. I haven't seen the interview, nor do I want to see it; but press reports suggest that it was cringeworthy and didn't convince anyone of his innocence. Selective forgetfulness is not any sort of defence.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Why Me said:

Not British but saw a snippet of the interview on the BBC website. Comes across as an entitled turdball. Not too bright either to defend his staying with Epstein as owing to being honorable.

 

The French had the right idea dealing with royalty.

well he was a Royal Navy Captain, they are not noted for their brains, or their judgement. 😂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...