Prince Andrew says he has no recollection of meeting Epstein accuser

[Tippaporn 4,284]

8 hours ago, madmen said:

He is Royalty and untouchable and he knows it

If the truth regarding the web of pedophilia and it's ties to Satanism comes to light even his Royalty will not protect him.

[soalbundy 16,921]

well he was known as randy Andy in his earlier years. Sex slave is a bit exaggerated, she was a young tart on her way up earning a bit of cash, now she is trying to wring it out and earn a bit more, good luck with that, just as Trump is finding out, you don't screw the establishment, they screw you.

[sillyfool 686]

i did not have sexual relations with that woman...... o wait.

[BobBKK 5,987]

"no recollection' of that beautiful girl he has his arms around?  yea, right!  

[Orton Rd 10,919]

Claimes of the photo being fake are clutching at straws and rather pathetic, if it was a fake from 2001 they would have proved so long ago. Instead of that they claim his hands look chubby and that she is too tall, obviously they never saw a girl wearing heels,

[owl sees all 4,629]

1 hour ago, sillyfool said:

i did not have sexual relations with that woman...... o wait.

A reference to Bill Clinton; I think. Well Clinton didn't have a relationship with Monica. Just an encounter.

Edited November 17, 2019 by owl sees all

[Tug 9,605]

Must have been a lousy piece of ass to have forgotten lol

[faraday 7,148]

Ahhh...finally after attempting to divert us from, this by the poor Megan stories, he does an interview with Maitlis.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/16/prince-andrew-what-is-the-excuse-for-this-misogynistic-nonsense-served-up-in-a-gilded-chamber

 

Didn't know this; a cause for concern, in light of these *ahem* allegations....?

 

"this proud patron of the NSPCC believes this substitutes for giving a <deleted> about Epstein’s victims."

[sillyfool 686]

41 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

A reference to Bill Clinton; I think. Well Clinton didn't have a relationship with Monica. Just an encounter.

yes of course he did. he also didn't take a ride on the lolita express either...o wait.

 

 

[klauskunkel 17,884]

12 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do and I admit fully that my judgement was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable but that's just the way it is."

Personally, I wouldn't proclaim myself as being honorable, it's just not an honorable thing to do..., I'm just too modest to do that. 

[Pedrogaz 2,468]

One of the things that always disturbs me about underage sex and the like is that it depends on where you are. 16 is the age of consent in the UK, whereas it is 18 in the US. If it happened in the UK then obviously it would be unseemly, but not criminal. In the US it is statutory rape whether consensual or not.

 

Having said that, this was a PR disaster. I haven't seen the interview, nor do I want to see it; but press reports suggest that it was cringeworthy and didn't convince anyone of his innocence. Selective forgetfulness is not any sort of defence.

[DaddyWarbucks 981]

You've done more than let the side down.

Your indiscreet dallying with tarts and dubious relations with "businessmen" who have close connections with foreign intelligence agencies will make your name ring foul forever.

[Xaos 1,054]

"

The hour-long BBC programme on Prince Andrew and the allegations against him, including a 45-minute interview in which he tried to justify himself, has just ended.

It was an excruciating car crash performance by the prince that would convince any impartial observer that Andrew is blatantly lying.

Andrew had a long friendship with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, who died in a Manhattan jail in August.

Among the many extraordinary statements were:

That he was initially “too honourable” to break off his friendship with Epstein when sex trafficking allegations first emerged.

That when he went to stay with Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in 2011, it was because he wanted to tell him in person they could no longer be friends. But he was then forced to admit he stayed there for four days and Epstein threw a dinner party in his honour.

That allegations by sex trafficking victim Veronica Roberts Giuffre that Andrew went to Tramp nightclub in London with her, danced with her while sweating profusely, and later had sex with her cannot be true because on that day he was at Pizza Express in Woking, and moreover at that time he had a mysterious medical condition that made him unable to sweat.

That he has never partied and never allows photographs of him to be taken hugging anybody because he ‘doesn’t hug as a royal’ (claims contradicted by numerous tabloid photographs). 

That he doesn’t regret his friendship with Epstein.

The interview was a staggering disaster that has managed to do further damage not only to Andrew’s already ruined reputation, but also to the British monarchy."

[Pilotman 9,387]

12 hours ago, Why Me said:

Not British but saw a snippet of the interview on the BBC website. Comes across as an entitled turdball. Not too bright either to defend his staying with Epstein as owing to being honorable.

 

The French had the right idea dealing with royalty.

well he was a Royal Navy Captain, they are not noted for their brains, or their judgement. 

[JonnyF 6,648]

12 hours ago, nausea said:

No recollection is different from it never hsppened. I have no recollection of lots of things. I can tell you for sure what never happened. The guy should've stayed in the shadows, where he belongs. 

Exactly. Using the words No Recollection is just covering himself in case more evidence comes out. If he asked me or you about that incident we would say we definitely didn't do it, because we didn't do it and we know it.

 

Clearly a slime ball. You would think a life of incredible privilege would be enough for him but it seems he needs more. People in these positions should not be hanging out with convicted paedophile scumbags.