Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

Prince Andrew says he has no recollection of meeting Epstein accuser

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KhaoYai said:

On what charge?

You ask quite a few inexperienced, almost naive questions.

 

How old are you?

 

🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, faraday said:

You ask quite a few inexperienced, almost naive questions.

 

How old are you?

 

🙂

Now now, don't do the usual TV thing and make things personal hiding behind your keyboard. I think its far more likely that you don't quite understand but if you'd like to point out what is 'inexperienced' or 'almost naive', I'll be happy to comment further.

 

Inexperienced? I would be prepared to bet that my knowledge of such matters and of the law in particular is substantially greater than yours.  Elaborate please - in this case there is no question of Prince Andrew being 'banged up' for anything.  Even if the girl had been 'groomed' as she claims, she went willingly to a house with him and had sex and she was of legal age. If any grooming had taken place - it was not carried out by Andrew he would simply have been the beneficiary of it.  On the face of what's claimed so far, the issue of consent is not in question. Under laws introduced recently, she may have had a case but she would have difficulty in proving it.

Edited by KhaoYai
  • Confused 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, faraday said:

No, it's not "slightly different".

I'm afraid it is. I have not heard Andrew claim he didn't know her. He said he had no recollection of meeting her that night. His answers were very careful and when asked if the events could have taken place on a different date, he said no. He could not deny knowing her as he has been photographed with her on several occasions.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

So he doesn't deny, as this could be proofed wrong. Not remembering is a much safer answer

 

     A chip off the old block , papa would be proud oh him..

    It,s  in the royals, DNA. 

 

 

Edited by elliss
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At post #92.

 

🤓

 

I explained myself, & gave post numbers, but unfortunately, your responses appear muddled. As usual.

 

Let's be grown up, not try to win (in your case) & agree to disagree, bor kap?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Profane acronym ? I wonder what that might have been ? 

Blimey it was <deleted>

Is that a profanity?

Edited by metisdead
Profane acronym removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the pizzagate sex conspiracy rumour still fresh in the memory, probably not the wisest thing to use the alibi he was having a pizza at the time...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the woman can describe his royal todger to prove her claim and he can take a lie detector test

 

is he circ or uncirc ? we want to know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, wgdanson said:

Maurice Chevalier did.

🎶Thank heaven for little girls.🎶

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Orton Rd said:

Claimes of the photo being fake are clutching at straws

"clutching at straws"

The reality is Andrew "clutching" girl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...