Jump to content

Future Forward facing wave of lawsuits

Recommended Posts

Future Forward facing wave of lawsuits

By The Nation



Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit


As ruling by the Constitutional Court is looming, Krungthepturakij political reporters are gathering information of multiple charges against key leaders of key  Future Forward Party.


Future Forward Party members are mustering evidence to defend it against multiple legal actions in the Constitutional Court that threaten its existence.

Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, the party’s secretary-general, has said more than 20 complaints had been brought against the party that could lead to its dissolution.


Anti-corruption activist Srisuwan Chanya petitioned the Election Commission to investigate party leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit’s shares in V-Luck Media, possession of which is constitutionally prohibited for elected members of the House of Representatives.


The commission forwarded the request to the Constitutional Court, which will render a decision on Wednesday (November 20).


Thanathorn claims he yielded the shares prior to the March election and insists having the shares would have given him no advantage in the polls at any rate.


If the court rules against him, he would immediately be removed from office.


The commission could also take further action against Thanathorn if it’s proven he was legally disqualified to run for office and yet did so anyway.


Srisuwan also petitioned the Supreme Court to revoke Thanathorn’s right to register for the election because of the shares and asked the Election Commission to suspend its announcement of winning party candidates.


Srisuwan has prodded the commission about Thanathorn loaning party members a combined Bt191 million and with his wife donating Bt17.2 million to the party itself.


Srisuwan has complained that Pannika Wanich, the party’s spokeswoman, donated Bt1 million to the party after submitting documents to the National Anti-Corruption Commission showing just Bt91,066 in her bank account against total assets of Bt3.3 million.


Songklod Chuenchuaphon asked the commission to dissolve the party on March 29, charging that Thanathorn had criticised the Constitutional Court.

Surawat Sangkhareuk, chairman of a citizens’ political group, sought the party’s dissolution, citing behaviour seen as “an attempt to overthrow the monarchy”.


Sonthiya Sawasdee, a former representative of the Action Coalition for Thailand Party, on April 11 also asked the commission to postpone its announcement of the party’s winning candidates, citing Thanathorn’s invitation to a dozen foreign embassies to have delegates monitor the election outcome.


Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30378427



-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-11-18
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nobodysfriend said:

Some people are obviously very scared about the Future Foreward party ...

They should be more scared if the party is dissolved.... having an opposition party helps keep checks & balances in place, without that you have a dictator like Cambodia, and a lot of unhappy voters on the streets.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

obviously the govt has realized the FF are going to take over and start winning elections so have been getting their lackies to file these BS actions against them. The accusations are pathetic at best but typical of what the govt will do to maintain power, lets hope that the courts are not so easily swayed and realize these are all bogus charges

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

 a lot of unhappy voters on the streets.


Which is why hardcore revolutionaries welcome it.


To the extent that they aggressively provoke repression by the target regime.


They don't really need to do that in Thailand, the blind hubris of the regime guarantees that it will do it unprovoked......by them.


Because It, like many in history, is Pavlovian in its responses to the threat of change.


In the New Era Thailand is accelerating steadily towards the "real deal".





Edited by Enoon
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, webfact said:

Anti-corruption activist Srisuwan Chanya

He should have so much work with the government members. I wonder that he has time to spend so much time with other parties. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule of what's "good for the goose is good for the gander" should apply here. If it was, the Constitutional Court would be overwhelmed with accusations against members of the ruling party, right up to and including the top brass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a good article in the Asiatimes today. Thanathorn was interviewed for the article and it is interesting how he responds to some of the questions. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...