Jump to content
You are not logged in ▶️ Click here to sign-up or login ×

In Trump-Nixon impeachment comparison, Pelosi raises specter of resignation

webfact

By webfact
in World News

Recommended Posts

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

 

Why not? That seems to be the standard set by the left nowadays. If Biden did nothing wrong then why the big fuss? 

 

 

If there is no dirt, then there's no issue, right? 

The Republican’s star witness Kurt Volker has just testified under oath that the whole Biden accusation were fake.

 

He did so right after the Republicans has finished praising his integrity, unique access to the events and all round credibility.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply
J Town Platinum Member

J Town

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Republican’s star witness Kurt Volker has just testified under oath that the whole Biden accusation were fake.

 

He did so right after the Republicans has finished praising his integrity, unique access to the events and all round credibility.

 

There's some obvious trolling going on. It's best to ignore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thainesss Apprentice Member

Thainesss

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Republican’s star witness Kurt Volker has just testified under oath that the whole Biden accusation were fake.

 

He said they were "not credible" he did not say they were "fake". 

 

You know what else he said? No indication of Quid Pro Quo, Bribery, or Extortion. He said that. 

 

Sooo the Democrat clown-show continues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Diamond Member

candide

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, J Town said:

Not at all. Sondland's opening written statement is incredible and the testimony will be worth staying up late for.

Right!

"I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sirineou Star Member

sirineou

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Thainesss said:
1 hour ago, sirineou said:

This is an impeachment inquiry, articles of impeachment have not being written yet. 

And YES one of them will be that he abused his power and used the wrong channels.

 

Good luck with that. It'll never work and Trump is gonna complete his term. 

Can you please use your great prognosticating abilities for good instead of evil :cheesy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, J Town said:

Not at all. Sondland's opening written statement is incredible and the testimony will be worth staying up late for.

Yeah you're right but his public performance will be much more important as far as potential to move public opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, candide said:

Right!

"I know that members of this Committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes."

Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
J Town Platinum Member

J Town

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

It was understood by who, Volker and Morrison stated no "quid pro quo", nothing related to bribery. Their statements aren't hearsay, there was "no demand" for anything.

 

"But it was fully understood isn't evidence. 

Oops - Sondland recanted. He now says black and white there WAS a quid pro quo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bristolboy Gold Member

bristolboy

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

 

He said they were "not credible" he did not say they were "fake". 

 

You know what else he said? No indication of Quid Pro Quo, Bribery, or Extortion. He said that. 

 

Sooo the Democrat clown-show continues. 

Right. They were not credible because they were not fake? They were just false.? But unintentionally false? Unintentional falsehoods springing from 3 indicted lowlifes, Fruman, Parnas, and Firstash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
J Town Platinum Member

J Town

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Right. They were not credible because they were not fake? They were just false.? But unintentionally false? Unintentional falsehoods springing from 3 indicted lowlifes, Fruman, Parnas, and Firstash. 

Keep up people. In his written opening statement, Sondland clearly said "We were all aware of what was going on and there was a quid pro quo."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bristolboy Gold Member

bristolboy

Posted
Posted

Sondland testimony targets Trump, Pompeo and confirms deal with Ukraine

Gordon Sondland, the American ambassador to the E.U., is pointing the finger at President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former national security adviser John Bolton in explosive public testimony on Wednesday in which he says explicitly that there was a "quid quo pro" linking a White House visit by Ukraine's president to investigations into a political opponent of the president.

Under fire from all sides after multiple witnesses contradicted his earlier deposition, Sondland blames everyone but himself for the pressure campaign on Ukraine now driving impeachment proceedings against Trump. He plans to show up for his televised hearing with reams of new text messages and emails he said prove the highest levels of the White House and the State Department were in on it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sondland-testimony-targets-trump-pompeo-confirms-deal-ukraine-n1086541

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bristolboy Gold Member

bristolboy

Posted
Posted

Also, let's not forget how bad Volker's testimony was for Trump:

How Republicans' star impeachment witness turned on them

 

Former US Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker was widely seen as Republicans' impeachment ace in the hole. On Tuesday on Capitol Hill, it didn't work out that way.

Volker's opening statement repeatedly acknowledged that statements he made during his October 3 closed-door deposition in front of House investigators had been not fully informed.
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...