Jump to content

Arcuri says she had 'very special relationship' with Johnson


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

"Special relationship" can mean a lot of things. Many guys and women enjoy flirting, even though they're married or whatever, it doesn't necessarily mean they have any intention of following through, it's just a pleasant diversion.

Edited by nausea
Punctuation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nausea said:

"Special relationship" can mean a lot of things. Many guys and women enjoy flirting, even though they're married or whatever, it doesn't necessarily mean they have any intention of following through, it's just a pleasant diversion.

Even in the unlikely case that that's all there was to it, their relationship still violates the code of conduct:

"The code governing conduct at London City Hall states that public office holders should not act in any way to gain benefits for families or friends, and should declare private interests to resolve any conflicts."

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49957957

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently there is a superinjunction?

...and there is a love-child.

This cannot be mentioned by the media in the UK 

 

TheBritish press are being very coy about what they say.....there must be some fagging order.....and a love-child.......

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/jennifer-acruri-claims-pm-told-20905219?

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Airbagwill said:

Apparently there is a superinjunction?

...and there is a love-child.

This cannot be mentioned by the media in the UK 

 

TheBritish press are being very coy about what they say.....there must be some fagging order.....and a love-child.......

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/jennifer-acruri-claims-pm-told-20905219?

 

 

 

 

 

The love child mentioned is Boris 5th child Stephanie  born in 2009 to Macintyre.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She should just get over it. The interview (I watched it on "good morning") was pathetic, she would not answer a single question posed at her. After the interview the camera went to "Lorraine" whose show was up next and she called the woman out for wasting viewers time and told her not to ask for TV interviews if she would not answer any questions.

 

The UK (am there at the moment) considers her just another wanna-be-celeb who no one particularly likes or is interested in.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MRToMRT said:

She should just get over it. The interview (I watched it on "good morning") was pathetic, she would not answer a single question posed at her. After the interview the camera went to "Lorraine" whose show was up next and she called the woman out for wasting viewers time and told her not to ask for TV interviews if she would not answer any questions.

 

The UK (am there at the moment) considers her just another wanna-be-celeb who no one particularly likes or is interested in.

 

 

You understand what a super-injunction is?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Airbagwill said:

 

I don't think you understand what a super injunction is

For evadgib's benefit, It's a way the UK court systems protects the elites. Essentially, not only does it not allow media to report on an issue, but it doesn't even allow them to say that they are barred from reporting on it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

For evadgib's benefit, It's a way the UK court systems protects the elites. Essentially, not only does it not allow media to report on an issue, but it doesn't even allow them to say that they are barred from reporting on it.

In which case ITV must be in the.....?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Piers Morgan seemed to gloat & made no attempt to apologize as you'd expect if he/ITV knew.

For the time being I'll consider this to be nothing more than rumour.

 

49 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Piers Morgan seemed to gloat & made no attempt to apologize as you'd expect if he/ITV knew.

For the time being I'll consider this to be nothing more than rumour.

any super injunction would be about new information - the media is just discussing stuff we already know.

ITV and the UK haven't mentioned anything new yet........ we may have to wait until after the election unless another country decides to break rank.

Edited by Airbagwill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Airbagwill said:

 

any super injunction would be about new information - the media is just discussing stuff we already know.

ITV and the UK haven't mentioned anything new yet........ we may have to wait until after the election unless another country decides to break rank.

Not a thing you have said in the last two pages of this thread has been based on a) any facts or b) publicly reported information, its all supposition on your part. You are just making up your own narrative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, MRToMRT said:

Not a thing you have said in the last two pages of this thread has been based on a) any facts or b) publicly reported information, its all supposition on your part. You are just making up your own narrative?

MRT - That can be said of many posts on TVF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MRToMRT said:

Not a thing you have said in the last two pages of this thread has been based on a) any facts or b) publicly reported information, its all supposition on your part. You are just making up your own narrative?

Quote

 

 

All willbe reed after the election.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...