Jump to content

Trump vows U.S. Navy will not oust commando who posed with corpse from SEALs


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump vows U.S. Navy will not oust commando who posed with corpse from SEALs

 

2019-11-21T172316Z_1_LYNXMPEFAK1II_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP.JPG

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a tour of Apple's Mac Pro manufacturing plant in Austin, Texas, U.S., November 20, 2019. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday blasted the U.S. Navy's handling of a Navy SEAL whose rank he recently restored following a court martial, saying he would not allow the service to remove his SEAL status.

 

This marks the most recent intervention by Trump in a military case and comes despite senior Navy leadership supporting a decision to review Edward Gallagher's status as a SEAL.

 

"The Navy will NOT be taking away Warfighter and Navy Seal Eddie Gallagher’s Trident Pin. This case was handled very badly from the beginning. Get back to business!" Trump said in a post on Twitter.

 

A military jury convicted Gallagher of illegally posing with an Islamic State detainee's corpse while deployed to Iraq in 2017 but acquitted him of murder, prompting a demotion in rank and pay but not prison time.

 

Trump last week restored his rank https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-warcrimes-pardon/trump-pardons-army-officers-restores-navy-seals-rank-in-war-crimes-cases-idUSKBN1XP2G4 and pay, and pardoned two Army officers who were separately accused of war crimes in Afghanistan.

 

Critics said Trump’s moves undermined military justice and sent a message that battlefield atrocities would be tolerated.

 

U.S. officials and Gallagher's lawyer told Reuters on Tuesday that Navy officials were considering whether to remove him from the Navy's special operations force.

 

Gallagher and three other SEALs were notified on Wednesday that they must appear before a board that will decide whether they should be stripped of their SEAL status.

 

The Navy referred questions to the White house.

 

(Reporting by Idreees Ali and Susan Heavey; Editing by Bernadette Baum and Lisa Shumaker)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-11-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again Trump is going to see the limits of his power.......he can pardon a service member but he can't make other warriors excuse that behavior the betrayed their code...and no one has a right to be a Special Warfare Operator.....it is something that must be earned....a concept that is foreign to one who has not served 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Langsuan Man said:

Once again Trump is going to see the limits of his power.......he can pardon a service member but he can't make other warriors excuse that behavior the betrayed their code...and no one has a right to be a Special Warfare Operator.....it is something that must be earned....a concept that is foreign to one who has not served 

I guess you must have served with very different soldiers from the ones I served with. They'd scorn anyone that thought taking a photo with a dead person was a crime.

Frankly, it's becoming pathetic.

Betrayed their code? LOL. Warriors? Did soldiers in your outfit actually call themselves that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoePai said:

At least he sticks up for the military - unlike the Brit Government

Is there actually a military still in the UK? 

Seriously, what the politicians have been doing to the UK military is a crime. Now, they couldn't even take back the Falklands if the Argies tried again. 

Have they manged to find a few planes to put on the one and only carrier they have now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

War is the killing of one group of people by another group of people usually for gain. The so called rules of conduct were codified over many years using words like chivalry, gentlemanly, honourable, all euphemisms for causing the other persons death.

The Great wars have now gone leaving us with “conflicts” and proxy wars and the rules seem to apply to one side only and are applied by self righteous people sat behind a desk.

This case involving the Navy Seal has convicted him of the least of the crimes he was accused of, if this was all he did it should never have been publicised and those who were offended by it are not fit for purpose.

The people we send to kill in our names have ROE but their opposition have none, do we condemn them or do we apply common sense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I guess you must have served with very different soldiers from the ones I served with. They'd scorn anyone that thought taking a photo with a dead person was a crime.

 

 

That was only #6 on a list of 10.

1-5:

Article 80 Attempted Murder

Article 118 Premeditated Murder

Article 128 Aggravated Assault with a Dangerous Weapon x2 on non-combatants

Article 134 Firearm, discharging-willfully, under such circumstances as to endanger human life at non-combatants

Article 134 Obstructing Justice (three counts)

 

 

No wonder you're a bit "melancholy" (isolated?) if you think this is OK:

 

 

"Other snipers said they witnessed Gallagher taking at least two militarily pointless shots, shooting and killing an unarmed old man in a white robe as well as a young girl walking with other girls."

 

Eddie Gallagher (Navy SEAL) - Wikipedia

 

 

 

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Enoon said:

 

Trump alienating, possibly splitting, the military?

 

Was is part of the plan, or is it just the "icing on the cake"?

 

Whatever, Putin played a real "blinder" when he got him elected.

 

 

Yeah, Putin sure has his boy in the WH. Draft dodger, mocker of war heroes, alienating allies, spilling secrets etc, etc. etc. Putin must have had continuous wood for the last 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Enoon said:

"Other snipers said they witnessed Gallagher taking at least two militarily pointless shots, shooting and killing an unarmed old man in a white robe as well as a young girl walking with other girls."

If that were true, wouldn't it be that he was being prosecuted for and not taking a photo of a dead man.

We want rough men to protect us and then crucify them when they behave like rough men. 

Perhaps we should just leave and let bad people do what they will because we are too PC to do the job.

Rome fell because Romans got too soft to do the job and they had to get mercenaries to fight for them.

Looks like we are next to be a past civilization. The next country to rule the world doesn't give a monkey's about gentleman's rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If that were true, wouldn't it be that he was being prosecuted for and not taking a photo of a dead man.

We want rough men to protect us and then crucify them when they behave like rough men. 

Perhaps we should just leave and let bad people do what they will because we are too PC to do the job.

Rome fell because Romans got too soft to do the job and they had to get mercenaries to fight for them.

Looks like we are next to be a past civilization. The next country to rule the world doesn't give a monkey's about gentleman's rules.

are you suggesting that there is no ceiling on the amount of war crimes that one person or one nation can commit with impunity, or that there is no such thing as a war crime?

 

your Roman equivalence is amusing and very thin. It overlooks the corruption in government and massive military overspending following Rome’s decision at the outset of the second century, to limit further expansion of the empire, expansion that built and sustained the empire... not to mention the curious fact that Christianity’s rise matched the downfall of Rome.

 

so... are we next to be a “past civilization”? Well... the parallels between the US traits of overspending, corruption and religion suggests that your “civilization” may well be doomed to Rome’s fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rump is a micro manager he may keep the E-7 his trident but how many missions will the E-7 get now. He has continued to enter into working spaces he has been told not to enter. He is the type of guy who thinks the rules do not apply to him. It was his teammates who turned him in for dnagerous conduct. People are taught to fight and to kill but not to leave there humanity behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/2019 at 5:45 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

I guess you must have served with very different soldiers from the ones I served with. They'd scorn anyone that thought taking a photo with a dead person was a crime.

Frankly, it's becoming pathetic.

Betrayed their code? LOL. Warriors? Did soldiers in your outfit actually call themselves that? 

Just so you know I think it was stabbing to death a wounded prisoner that ticked them off more than taking photos with corpses of dead enemies seals are supposed to be the cream of the crop so to speak that’s why they are supposed to perform to and held to a higher standard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2019 at 8:45 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I guess you must have served with very different soldiers from the ones I served with. They'd scorn anyone that thought taking a photo with a dead person was a crime.

Frankly, it's becoming pathetic.

Betrayed their code? LOL. Warriors? Did soldiers in your outfit actually call themselves that? 

Then how do you reconcile the fact it was his own soldiers who complained. His own team do not think like your team did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2019 at 4:49 AM, webfact said:

"The Navy will NOT be taking away Warfighter and Navy Seal Eddie Gallagher’s Trident Pin. This case was handled very badly from the beginning. Get back to business!" Trump said in a post on Twitter.

I'll put this threat/promise right next to the rest of the list of things he has and will fail to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...