Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Legal experts summoned by Democrats call Trump actions impeachable

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

The point is that Trump has 0% chance of being removed and that there is going to be a lot of dirt coming up on the dems. This won't be good for them when we have this thing called an election.

He may not be removed but he should be. He has been corrupt from day one. As I mentioned in a previous post. Keeping up to date with credible journalists and intellectual speakers regarding Trump, would leave you to wonder why on earth do people support this guy. Well, most of it WAS due to being the better choice from HRC. Yeah, I thought so too. Regardless, his support has been reduced and Bernie is gaining grown. Any informed citizen would do well to support Bernie rather than another corporate enabler not to mention corrupt and of divisive character. Did I mention, War? Israel? Healthcare? Education?

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Puchaiyank said:

How many think the Democrats would call a so-called legal expert that did not think Trump should be impeached...raise your hands...I thought so!   😊

Better that conspiracy based defense 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, ExpatOK said:

The last two days have been a disaster for Pelosi. With Nadler falling asleep in his own hearing and her own overemotional meltdown, she's in big trouble. She doesn't have the votes or else she would hold a vote.  The likelihood of getting the votes now is slim to none and slim just left town.

Hyperbole much. She so full of confident that she announced the drafting of impeachment articles just a day after Nadler’s impeachment hearing. Your hyperbolic assumption headed for the cliff. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Hyperbole much. She so full of confident that she announced the drafting of impeachment articles just a day after Nadler’s impeachment hearing. Your hyperbolic assumption headed for the cliff. 

It's just sad to see how smug and confident Pelosi acts with nothing more than facts, logic, ethics, integrity and the constitution on her side.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What "High Crime (aka Felony)" or "Misdemeanor" has Trump committed? If your going to impeach a President of the USA, the constitution requires the accused to actually be accused of a crime. What crime did Donald Trump commit?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tounge Thaied said:

What "High Crime (aka Felony)" or "Misdemeanor" has Trump committed? If your going to impeach a President of the USA, the constitution requires the accused to actually be accused of a crime. What crime did Donald Trump commit?

Seriously? Have you paid NO attention? Take off the "Fox News" glasses, go look at ANY other news source. They're all reporting the same info.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, J Town said:

Seriously? Have you paid NO attention? Take off the "Fox News" glasses, go look at ANY other news source. They're all reporting the same info.

If the crime Trump has committed is so obvious, just give it to us bro. You can't. There has been no crime and there has been no crime even alleged as of yet. Every bit of "testimony" has been hear say. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tounge Thaied said:

If the crime Trump has committed is so obvious, just give it to us bro. You can't. There has been no crime and there has been no crime even alleged as of yet. Every bit of "testimony" has been hear say. 

No, I'm tired of providing facts just to have people say "No, you're wrong." Trump supporters always, and I mean ALWAYS respond in one or more of the following:
Deny

Ignore

Lie

Deflect

Obfuscate

Tell you what, "bro," answer these two questions:

1) Do you acknowledge Trump called Ukraine and asked them to make a public announcement they were investigating the Bidens for corruption?

2) If so, do you find it acceptable that a U.S. president would have a foreign nation get involved in the 2020 election?

Answer these "yes" or "no." Expand as much as you want after, but initially answer "yes" or "no." Then we can go from there.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Tounge Thaied said:
14 minutes ago, J Town said:

Seriously? Have you paid NO attention? Take off the "Fox News" glasses, go look at ANY other news source. They're all reporting the same info.

If the crime Trump has committed is so obvious, just give it to us bro. You can't. There has been no crime and there has been no crime even alleged as of yet. Every bit of "testimony" has been hear say. 

"Hearsay"...?  All the testimony was under oath and have been collaborated.  But why wasn't there first-hand information?  Because Trump has refused to allow those with first-hand information to testify.  But even if they all testified and told the truth, Trump would insist that they were lying.  So it comes down to who to believe, Trump or pretty much everyone else.  And we know that Trump is a pathological liar. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...