Jump to content

Law Council disagrees with EC move for Future Forward dissolution


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Law Council disagrees with EC move for Future Forward dissolution

By The Nation

 

800_fb877acc3fcf099.jpg

Narinpong Chinapak

 

The chief of the Law Council of Thailand has expressed his disagreement with the Election Commission's petition to the Constitution Court, seeking dissolution of Future Forward Party overs its leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit allegedly illegally granting loans to the party.

 

President of the council, Narinpong Chinapak, said the EC petition cites Article 72 of the organic law on political parties, which prohibits holders of political positions from receiving money, properties or any profit from illegal sources both knowingly and unknowingly. 

 

However, Narinpong said that Thanathorn’s loans are not an illegal source of money as he has made contracts according to the law.

 

He added that the EC petition did not seem to be completely transparent and tried to illogically link the loan case with Article 72.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30379415

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, snoop1130 said:

He added that the EC petition did not seem to be completely transparent and tried to illogically link the loan case with Article 72.

He won't make any friends in high places with that comment, accurate as it is. Nice to see at least one person of standing though have the balls to stand up and publicly decry what is an obvious travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, snoop1130 said:

He added that the EC petition did not seem to be completely transparent and tried to illogically link the loan case with Article 72.

And there was me thinking they had a real case. The junta not only don’t have to abide by the law, they get to interpret the laws too. Look at that witch and the land that she stole. In any normal democracy, politicians could only show support. They have zero right to say whether or not she will face legal action or not. That’s not up to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rkidlad said:

And there was me thinking they had a real case. The junta not only don’t have to abide by the law, they get to interpret the laws too. Look at that witch and the land that she stole. In any normal democracy, politicians could only show support. They have zero right to say whether or not she will face legal action or not. That’s not up to them. 

Yeh the Heroin minister smoothing that out for her .

You got love Prayuts buddies, for a man that wanted end corruption and graft his best pals are the top offenders .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BuckBee said:

Yeh the Heroin minister smoothing that out for her .

You got love Prayuts buddies, for a man that wanted end corruption and graft his best pals are the top offenders .

While undoubtedly true, and while more souls than you and I know why and how, it puzzles me why anyone would be surprised. Surely nobody but a fool would expect honourable behaviour from most Thais... it's not exactly a known feature of their culture... Is it?

 

Talk is one thing but they seem to draw the line at actually doing something useful.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, darksidedog said:

He won't make any friends in high places with that comment, accurate as it is. Nice to see at least one person of standing though have the balls to stand up and publicly decry what is an obvious travesty.

Could be a stooge for the administration to give the appearance of a democratic process.If he was fair dinkum about his concerns he would do more than just say he dissapproves,which he might be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

He added that the EC petition did not seem to be completely transparent and tried to illogically link the loan case with Article 72.

What is transparent is the illogical army's fear of this gentleman.   These corrupt xenophobes in green need to go back to base.  They just keep bullying and taking, pushing tourists and business to Vietnam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

He added that the EC petition did not seem to be completely transparent and tried to illogically link the loan case with Article 72

The EC is pushing too hard and will soon lose all credibility with it's witch-hunt against the FFP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ParkerN said:

They're only doing what they're told

I thought the EC was independent, like various other official organs in this country that is definitely a democracy and certainly not a di...

 

*connection lost*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Pedrogaz said:

This is just a witch-hunt against a political opponent with the usual Thai double standards. The EC is not fit for purpose.

Tell me a single government department or function that *is* fit for purpose in TL. The whole management thing here is incompetent on a good day and corruptly incompetent on all other days. Prayuth's oft-stated drive against corruption is a complete fiction; the clean up needs to start with him and his mates. In my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ParkerN said:

They're only doing what they're told. Same as most Thais.

 

 

Then they should seek employment in a factory or supermarket filling shelves.
The EC or justice system is not a place for domesticated robots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...