Jump to content
BANGKOK
Cheesekraft

Chiang Mai Air Quality & Pollution

Recommended Posts

"I would most definitely swear off all farang contact, if I were limited to that demographic."

 

Then again, some would say Thailand would be a much more enjoyable place without the natives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/13/2019 at 1:56 PM, Ron jeremy said:

What a rediculously stupid thing to say

u know the air is killing you, but u accept it knowing it’s going to take years off your life

and to those that go outside with masks on!!!!

what a life

i guess living in a place with clean air may not be a god idea?

Desperation and/or addiction is powerful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/13/2019 at 10:20 AM, villagefarang said:

In my experience, many of the people demanding perfection from Thailand and the environment are people who neglect their health on so many levels.  Many smoke, drink, are overweight, drive dangerously and have anger problems.  

 

I do sometimes have slight allergy like symptoms but have no heart or lung issues and I do modify my exercise and lifestyle depending on the weather and how I feel.  If I am wrong and my environment knocks a few years off my life expectancy, and I die at 90 instead of 95, like many of my relatives, I will accept that.  My mother smoked most of her life, only stopping in her later years, and still lived into her 90s.  One of my greatest worries, is living too long.

 

I am happy to let people make choices about their own lives and how they want to live but I expect to be allowed the same freedom of choice.  The internet being what it is, we mainly hear from the angry unhappy folks and I simply want to represent my own personal opinions which are somewhat less negative.

 

 

The worst part about living too long is that you have to struggle with the pain of your friends and family dying off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also this, which showed average (and a lot of days where it was not responding). make note that an average of 435 during the day, it could have been much higher, I saw my meter lock up at 500 quite a few times.

 

image.png.9b75ae198078bfa5b0791dabb97d52ce.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not a good start to the season. november pm2.5 around 25, above average. very unhealthy but no one seems to care yet. brace yourselves for dec-may. 

 

 

Edited by at15
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Families from Bangkok relocating to Chiang Mai for a better quality of life how much sense does that make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too much emphasis on ppm2.5

 

Burning of farm waste across India Pakistan Burma isn't going away and it will continue to add to north Thailands annual smoky season for decades.  Get used to it.  Geographically, we can't avoid natural weather patterns which exacerbate the local burning.

 

Nano air particles are not measured yet they are the pollutants which invade your bloodstream.  Mainly found alongside busy roads where vehicle emissions are high, the Nano particles are deadly compared with (say) rice chaff 2.5ppm smoke.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ I agree with 99% of what you say however my point was that the 2.5pm AQI measurement does not provide adequate information about pollutants nor any measure of nano particles.  The latter are those which can enter the bloodstream. 

 

Harmful pollutants from vehicle exhausts will be most concentrated at kerbside, road level, and diminish upwards and outwards from the source.  Industrial and commercial pollutants from burning plastics, power stations etc are more harmful than paddy field burn off.  These harmful levels are NOT measured in Thailand as in say Hong Kong, UK and most of EU.   Put it this way, if the AQI reading was say 300 alongside a paddy field burn off compared with a similar reading on Nimmenhaemin road during rush hour, which is more harmful?  The latter is obviously extremely noxious due to the chemical content, most of which are nano particles.  Nano particles can't be measured by current AQ meters, so the chemical analysis provides a good warning system.

 

If you're in the air above Thailand regularly during the worst of the smoky season you can plainly see the air currents which sweep smoke across 4 or more countries, from West to east.  Burma and Mae Hong Son smoke sweeps into the Chiang mai and other northern province valleys and is trapped by temperature inversion.  Yes, you are correct, Thailand contribute s to the phenomena.

 

We avoid driving in rush hour thru cities, even when AQI says it is safe as it's the Nano particles which do the most damage long term and they are more concentrated inside a vehicle than larger particles which may have been filtered out by your aircon system.

 

The current AQI 2.5pm system is not the best AQ indicator and requires a better understanding by those of us who live with the smoke and pollution.  For my part, I suffer no adverse effects on a bad day out in the country other than a few very dirty nose blows.  The larger 2.5pm particles being dust, earth or ash particles and they do not enter your bloodstream.  They will irritate those with breathing difficulties.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/27/2019 at 8:31 AM, McTavish said:

^ I agree with 99% of what you say however my point was that the 2.5pm AQI measurement does not provide adequate information about pollutants nor any measure of nano particles.  The latter are those which can enter the bloodstream. 

 

Harmful pollutants from vehicle exhausts will be most concentrated at kerbside, road level, and diminish upwards and outwards from the source.  Industrial and commercial pollutants from burning plastics, power stations etc are more harmful than paddy field burn off.  These harmful levels are NOT measured in Thailand as in say Hong Kong, UK and most of EU.   Put it this way, if the AQI reading was say 300 alongside a paddy field burn off compared with a similar reading on Nimmenhaemin road during rush hour, which is more harmful?  The latter is obviously extremely noxious due to the chemical content, most of which are nano particles.  Nano particles can't be measured by current AQ meters, so the chemical analysis provides a good warning system.

 

If you're in the air above Thailand regularly during the worst of the smoky season you can plainly see the air currents which sweep smoke across 4 or more countries, from West to east.  Burma and Mae Hong Son smoke sweeps into the Chiang mai and other northern province valleys and is trapped by temperature inversion.  Yes, you are correct, Thailand contribute s to the phenomena.

 

We avoid driving in rush hour thru cities, even when AQI says it is safe as it's the Nano particles which do the most damage long term and they are more concentrated inside a vehicle than larger particles which may have been filtered out by your aircon system.

 

The current AQI 2.5pm system is not the best AQ indicator and requires a better understanding by those of us who live with the smoke and pollution.  For my part, I suffer no adverse effects on a bad day out in the country other than a few very dirty nose blows.  The larger 2.5pm particles being dust, earth or ash particles and they do not enter your bloodstream.  They will irritate those with breathing difficulties.

I often wonder what about the chemicals sprayed on the rice fields is it destroyed by the burning or does some evaporate into the air as a toxin, or does it seep down into the water table then get pumped back into the towns water supply?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/27/2019 at 8:31 AM, McTavish said:

For my part, I suffer no adverse effects on a bad day out in the country other than a few very dirty nose blows.  The larger 2.5pm particles being dust, earth or ash particles and they do not enter your bloodstream.  They will irritate those with breathing difficulties.

Cool!  So no worries about lung cancer, emphysema, coronary problems. I don't feel a thing, yet.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/26/2019 at 6:01 PM, McTavish said:

Too much emphasis on ppm2.5

 

Burning of farm waste across India Pakistan Burma isn't going away and it will continue to add to north Thailands annual smoky season for decades.  Get used to it.  Geographically, we can't avoid natural weather patterns which exacerbate the local burning.

 

Nano air particles are not measured yet they are the pollutants which invade your bloodstream.  Mainly found alongside busy roads where vehicle emissions are high, the Nano particles are deadly compared with (say) rice chaff 2.5ppm smoke.

I find this info very interesting concerning the nano particles.  Have ofter thought about the ill effects of some many folks here living immediately next to roads and highways, often with their business as well, basically 24 hours a day.  Could this contribute to the prevalence of various cancers on the increase in Thailand.  Perhaps the health ministry folks could conduct a study of this, but the data available might not be accurate.

I will add that where I live in CR, in the farming area, almost all the fields have finished burning by end of Jan.  Last year we had clear sky until the evening of the day the burn ban went into effect, can't figure that one out, and I saw first hand very smokey skies that evening!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why is air quality bad in winter?

The cooler air is trapped under the warm air above that forms a kind of atmospheric 'lid'. This phenomenon is called winter inversion. ... During summers, pollution levels decrease as the warmer air rises up freely, making the boundary layer thicker, and providing enough space for pollutants to disperse.... (not unless you live in ChiangMai)
 
.......I was surprised to have gotten some high monitor readings since after this chill arrived.
The air quality to me doesn't seem to have that same raw twang of smokiness that we all have come to know.
Its more like old fashion 'industrial' byproduct. Anyways,numbers are numbers and so I still have the air purifiers running...the fans & AC can finally rest.

 

 

 

Edited by HaleySabai
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...