Jump to content

Driving at under 90kph in the right lane of highways may become an offence


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Don Mega said:

I see them daily on the 7 motorway but they only seem to target pickups with people in the back.

You are talking about motorway 7; the article talks about highways with more than four lanes ;

that is to say the vast majority of the main roads of Thailand.

( the highways, not highways with more than 4 lanes which are a few ) 
There are very few km of motorways in Thailand and they are all in and around Bangkok.

 

In addition this "announcement" is as usual a "non announcement" since it is written in the Thai highway code that normal traffic must be on the leftmost lane;
the one on the right is only used for overtaking.
When passing from the left, it is only authorized when a vehicle turns right.
So all vehicles that overtake a bus or truck that <deleted> the world off on the right lane are theoretically wrong .

 

As for trucks that do not drive on the left lane, this is for two main reasons:
the first is that roads are made here in spite of common sense

and the second is that far too many trucks are overloaded;

 

the combination of these two reasons means that the left track quickly becomes unusable due to the "manufacture" of rails in an insufficient thickness of bitumen.
It is not for nothing that many crossroads with a heavy traffic of heavy vehicles are gradually transformed by removing the bitumen to replace it with concrete.

 

But ... But if the police actually did its job, it would impose real dissuasive fines on overloaded drivers and owners of vehicles; thing that she does not do or very little ..
So, as usual, in the land of "crackdown" nothing will change ...:jap:

Edited by Assurancetourix
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Assurancetourix said:

You are talking about motorway 7; the article talks about highways with more than four lanes ;

that is to say the vast majority of the main roads of Thailand.

 

Yeah my bad, did not realise it was roads with more than 4 lanes.

The motorway only has 4 so I guess thats why it is not included but it would be good if they upgraded the entire motorway 7 to be 120km/h and deal with the A-Holes that do 90 in the RH lanes.

Edited by Don Mega
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Don Mega said:

Yeah my bad, did not realise it was roads with more than 4 lanes.

The motorway only has 4 so I guess thats why it is not included but it would be good if they upgraded the entire motorway 7 to be 120km/h and deal with the A-Holes that do 90 in the RH lanes.

 

I do not know the motorway 7, on the other hand I sometimes take the 9 where the speed is limited to 120 km / h ; at least on the part which bypasses Bangkok while going on Souvanaphum and Chonburi while coming from Saraburi .

 

As I wrote above, there are not many highways with more than 4 lanes in Thailand.
most are four-lane and so far the speed limit is 90 km / h.
Speed at which I drive on the left lane, I will write 90/95 meter; and as if by chance, it is at this speed that I have the maximum torque of the engine of my Isuzu 3 liters; therefore minimum consumption ...
most other vehicles including coaches and some trucks overtaking me at sometimes supersonic speeds.

Authorizing a higher speed, 120 km / h will therefore allow many motorists to drive at 140 or 150 per hour.
When we see the annual carnage at 90 an hour we can assume that Thailand will remain number 1 for the number of road deaths for many more years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Assurancetourix said:

 

I do not know the motorway 7, on the other hand I sometimes take the 9 where the speed is limited to 120 km / h ; at least on the part which bypasses Bangkok while going on Souvanaphum and Chonburi while coming from Saraburi .

 

As I wrote above, there are not many highways with more than 4 lanes in Thailand.
most are four-lane and so far the speed limit is 90 km / h.
Speed at which I drive on the left lane, I will write 90/95 meter; and as if by chance, it is at this speed that I have the maximum torque of the engine of my Isuzu 3 liters; therefore minimum consumption ...
most other vehicles including coaches and some trucks overtaking me at sometimes supersonic speeds.

Authorizing a higher speed, 120 km / h will therefore allow many motorists to drive at 140 or 150 per hour.
When we see the annual carnage at 90 an hour we can assume that Thailand will remain number 1 for the number of road deaths for many more years.

Ive not seen a motorway here with more than 4 lanes either.

 

Not sure why raising the speedlimit to 120km/h will allow people to travel at 150km/h.

 

When did Thailand become #1 for road deaths ?

Edited by Don Mega
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Benmart said:

I have been coming to Thailand since 1993 and living here full-time/driving since 2013, and no, I have never seen a police car patrolling or pulling over a traffic violator. I don't think the local cops know how or have the necessary vehicles.

very true about number of police cars.....just like the whole force which is said to be only 250 k 

small for a big country and population of Thailand !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Transport Minister Saksayam Chidchob said today that the idea of setting the minimum speed for driving in the right lane will be considered, together with a proposal to increase the speed limit on highways to 120kph and other highway laws.

That will make the infamous U-turn more interesting.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be nonsense on Sukhomvit Road between Bangkok and Rayong.  The number of U-turn and right turn lanes is being steadily reduced causing right lane backups on the highway.  A minimum 90 kph would increase the number of rear end collisions.  I am sure it is the same on most 2 lane highways in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But since the highway patrol continues to refuse to patrol the highways, these kinds of proclamations are beyond meaningless. A deterrent is a deterrent, and astonishing weakness, incompetence, indifference, and lack of ability is another thing altogether. That pretty much summarizes everything the army touches and attempts to do. That is just who they are. 

Edited by spidermike007
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Don Mega said:

I certainly hope it does, those people are dangerous and should not be on the road.... also need to address the issue of trucks on the motorway crawling along well under the speed limit side by side in 3 of the 4 lanes.

 

They should address this issue on all roads with more than one lane. Even on 2 lane roads idiots sit in the outside lane, crawling along, refusing to move over forcing undertaking or overtaking by crossing into the oncoming traffic lanes.

 

These selfish idiots need to be taught how to drive with regard to other road users and punished for ignoring it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

But since the highway patrol continues to refuse to patrol the highways, these kinds of proclamations are beyond meaningless. A deterrent is a deterrent, and astonishing weakness, incompetence, indifference, and lack of ability is another thing altogether. That pretty much summarizes everything the army touches and attempts to do. That is just who they are. 

 

Since when has the Highway Patrol been part of the Army?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Since when has the Highway Patrol been part of the Army?

The army has been proclaiming a desire to reduce highway deaths, and make the roads more safe for over five years now. Who is in control? Where does the responsibility for this lie? Does the army not have the power to make this happen, if they cared one iota about public safety, traffic safety, and the common man or woman? The highway patrol are a huge embarrassment to the nation. What do they do exactly, other than show up AFTER an accident has happened? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lemonjelly said:

Unworkable..... what if there’s heavy traffic, rush hour, 4 lanes full... all vehicles in right hand lane have to stay above 90 kmh? 
Driving responsibly according to traffic conditions is the mantra.

Correct.

 

Another brainless idea which does not address the main problems of lack of driver skill/education and law enforcement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, daveAustin said:

Slow driving is as dangerous as OTT speed. This is a good idea. Wish they would enact this type of thing on UK roads too... we have way way way too many retired old farts pottering along not giving a tinker's tosss about the working world around them. :whistling:

It is an offence in the UK as far as I know. If you're not overtaking then you need to move to the left as you are obstructing the road since undertaking is illegal in most cases. 

 

The problem in the UK is probably down to not enough traffic police. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Don Mega said:

it would be good if they upgraded the entire motorway 7 to be 120km/h

The entire length of Motorway 7 is set as 120 km/h speed limit, the sections where it flashes 90 are advisory and not enforceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drive on the right side most of the time ,for safety!

No double parked cars

No dotting cows and dogs from Soi's

No parked car doors being open unexpectedly

No motorbikes coming from the soi on the left  without looking

No children coming out from in between cars or soi's

 

I constantly observe if cars are approaching from the back and pull to the left side for them to pass.  

Edited by riclag
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, riclag said:

I drive on the right side most of the time ,for safety!

No double parked cars

No dotting cows and dogs from Soi's

No parked car doors being open unexpectedly

No children coming out from in between cars or soi's

 

I constantly observe if cars are approaching from the back and pull to the left side for them to pass.  


 

In which case you are performing one manoeuvre that the Thais do not seem to be capable of. It does, of course, require two thought processes.....1. Awareness of vehicles around you, probably achieved by use of your mirrors and...2) Reacting to that awareness by moving into the inside lane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Creasy said:

Personally. I have never seen a police car physically cruising up and down the roads to catch offenders .

Never been on the Chonburi Motorway then? 

3341128206_52208a0232_z.jpg

 

Couldn't find a picture of a Highway Police motorcycle but they are on the motorway as well.

 

Edited by VocalNeal
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...