Jump to content
BANGKOK
snoop1130

VIDEO: Angry British tourist PUNCHES Thai man on MRT

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DannyCarlton said:

This has not been proved. The prevalent story is that the English guy was angry at the Thai for trying to take photos of his girlfriend. A girlfriend who, judging by the videos, doesn't exist. Both versions are from Thai rak Thai sources who weren't at the scene.

Where did you get the information from he was English. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Percy P said:

Where did you get the information from he was English. 

Attitude, dress code and accent. My money's on Essex, probably Billericay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, fasteddie said:

Or racism?

The more 'developed' you are , the more racist you become.

Refer history... Who were the dirtiest racists?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, DannyCarlton said:

If the Brit had wanted to hit the Thai, he would have done. No chance of the guy in the yellow shirt stopping him. The English guy just vented his spleen, for whatever reason. The guy was probably a tourist, unaware of the urban myth that you allude to. I have vented my spleen on Thais on a number of occasions. I'm still here.

How do you know the Brit could have hit the Thai?

You weren't there.

how do you know the Brit was a tourist?

You weren't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bannork said:

How do you know the Brit could have hit the Thai?

You weren't there.

how do you know the Brit was a tourist?

You weren't there.

How do you know he hit the Tai? You weren't there (and there's no video evidence of it).

 

How do you know the Brit wasn't a tourist? The way he was dressed suggests that he was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

How do you know he hit the Tai? You weren't there (and there's no video evidence of it).

 

How do you know the Brit wasn't a tourist? The way he was dressed suggests that he was.

The video evidence shows he threw a punch! Check the video at 0.27 seconds. If you miss that, you need to see an optician.

Regarding the Brit being a tourist, he could be working in Thailand and it was his day off. you don't know.

 

 

 

Edited by bannork
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bannork said:

The video evidence shows he threw a punch! Check the video at 0.27 seconds. If you miss that, you need to see an optician.

Regarding the Brit being a tourist, he could be working in Thailand and it was his day off. you don't know.

 

 

 

He went to grab him at 27 seconds. it's clearer in the other video.

 

What does it matter whether he's a tourist or not? Your arguments are getting more and more absurd. I don't feed trolls. Conversation over.

 

 

Edited by DannyCarlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Percy P said:

But is he British, ethically he my not be British. If not be should be referred to in his own ethnicity..

He is British.  He is an Essex chav of the highest order - any Brit can recognise that.

And what has ethnicity got to do with nationality anyway?    Absolutely nothing.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, DannyCarlton said:

Both versions are from Thai rak Thai sources who weren't at the scene.

Thaksin?

 

You might have a chance of people taking your posts more seriously if you dispensed with the childish "Thai rak Thai" comments.  Make a case on your own based on what you see (and not what you imagine) and things may work out better.  Blanket statements do not really help.

And honestly, I still don't understand how you can defend the aggressor here.  But never mind, let's move on.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Thaksin?

 

You might have a chance of people taking your posts more seriously if you dispensed with the childish "Thai rak Thai" comments.  Make a case on your own based on what you see (and not what you imagine) and things may work out better.  Blanket statements do not really help.

And honestly, I still don't understand how you can defend the aggressor here.  But never mind, let's move on.

Why would I want people to take my posts seriously? It would defeat the whole objective of me posting. You need to get with the program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

Why would I want people to take my posts seriously? It would defeat the whole objective of me posting. You need to get with the program.

Don't worry, no one takes your posts seriously.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not trying to defend the British but There is always 2 side in a story. It seems that he really has been a real d...k but what happen before? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, DannyCarlton said:

Attitude, dress code and accent. My money's on Essex, probably Billericay.

Send him back their.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raymonddiaz said:

I am not trying to defend the British but There is always 2 sides in a story. It seems that he really has been a real d...k but what happen before? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...