Jump to content

Germany's other migration wave: the pensioner exodus


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Surprisingly low social security for an EU citizen. Combined for a couple only 1200 Euros? The average benefit for retired workers in the U.S. is $17,536 per annum or $1461/mo. http://www.pensionrights.org/publications/statistic/income-social-security

That's for one person. It's not quite enough to live in the U.S. I live in a city of 400,000 (including suburban townships) and I can live on $1800-1900 a month if I don't dine out much, and that includes car ownership. It also includes the $300 or so I pay in premiums per month for Medicare, which, with the supplemental program I choose, allows me 100% access without any co-pays or deductibles, and I can go straight to any specialist I want--even at famous hospitals like Johns Hopkins (but not the Mayo Clinic) if I felt the need. But my town has excellent hospitals and specialists. Medicare and supplement cover In-patient hospital care 100% for at least a year or so. I guess I wouldn't give up my situation to live in Thailand. The only place there I really like is Chiang Mai and the air there is so hazardous.

Edited by Dustdevil
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheDark said:

What is this all about?

 

I thought pensions are more like 2500 to 3500 euros per person?

What's going on here? Are pensions around Europe really that low in general? 1200 per person or even 600 per person?

That's <deleted> up. 

In Germany, pensions are paid directly from social security contributions of current employees. While employment has risen in Germany in recent years, wages and salaries have declined. Germany has pretty much the lowest wages in all of Western Europe. More pensioners, and lower or stagnant pay of the employed means less money transferred to pensioners.

 

Taxes are, at the same time, by far the highest (besides Scandinavia). So are living costs, esp. for housing and electricity. No wonder, that Germans have some of the lowest life-savings among OECD countries, well behind Greeks, Portuguese, and the Spanish.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You think factory workers, bus drivers, road sweepers, shelf stackers, cabbies, dustmen et al have spare money to make investments? You must be living in a different world to me.

Especially when those investments are being top upped by mythical money (quantitiveeasing) Once that money topples so will Jonny big balls .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

So are living costs, esp. for housing and electricity. No wonder, that Germans have the lowest life-savings among OECD countries. 

What should they save for? The EZB destroyes most pension plans and obviously nobody really seems to care much. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The phenomenon of retired economic refugee has been a real thing for a very long time. People from relatively richer countries moving abroad to improve their quality of life, generally fitting into these rough categories:

 

-- To be able to retire at all, EVER, in their home country

-- To be able to retire EARLIER than they would have been able to in their home country

-- To be able to afford extra amenities that wouldn't be possible in their home countries 

 

People that can afford to retire in their home country in comfort and security also retire abroad but they can't really be seen as fitting into any label of economic refugees. Some may even move to places much more expensive than their home countries. 

 

As far as the destination countries, they are of course always free to adjust their rules to attract more, fewer, or even no retired economic refugees.

 

I think there is a consensus understanding that Thailand in recent years has become objectively less welcoming to lower wealth retired expats though there are still many that will stay and move here that fit into the rough categories I listed above.

 

So Thailand may be on a long term trend to phase out retired expat economic refugees but for the foreseeable future anyway there will be others still seeking that demographic and probably new countries that will open up to that in the future. Some countries in Africa comes to mind for longer term potential.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

I can only speak for the situation in the USA but I feel that when you ditch America your SS should be cut. Living abroad is a privilege and a personal choice.

How many US government paychecks do you get?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised to see that the thread drew interest.

German workers pension system is doomed and one of the worst in central Europe.

It can't and won't work with the existing and developing demographics.

Sooner or later pension fund will have to be filled with tax money.

Everyone knows and politicians doing some kludge, putting plaster here and there.

Average pension in the west is about 1200 Euro per month.

 

Completely different situation for public servants where the low end is about 2500 Euro per month. All paid from tax money and a huge growing burden.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DaRoadrunner said:

About says it all. And not only in Germany.

People that don't work, never have and never will get more than pensioners in Germany. And the majority of those are Germans. 

 

Germany by constitution is obliged to grant eqal access to social benefits to everyone (regardless of where they come from) So, the only solution for Germany would be a return to Bismarck's system of social security for active workers only.

Sounds cruel, but there is no other way in the long run. Or else Germany will become a communist nanny state where everyone lives at the poverty level - and none of the successful (the "elite") will be allowed to leave the country. 

Don't make a mistake: for the average jobless German you are already elite if you have a good job. And their envy will follow you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, micmichd said:

People that don't work, never have and never will get more than pensioners in Germany. And the majority of those are Germans. 

 

Germany by constitution is obliged to grant eqal access to social benefits to everyone (regardless of where they come from) So, the only solution for Germany would be a return to Bismarck's system of social security for active workers only.

Sounds cruel, but there is no other way in the long run. Or else Germany will become a communist nanny state where everyone lives at the poverty level - and none of the successful (the "elite") will be allowed to leave the country. 

Don't make a mistake: for the average jobless German you are already elite if you have a good job. And their envy will follow you. 

There was me thinking Germany was the richest European country, with the biggest pensions.

The two poor retirees shown in the OP, seem to be getting double my Brit government pension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

There was me thinking Germany was the richest European country, with the biggest pensions.

The two poor retirees shown in the OP, seem to be getting double my Brit government pension.

The poor retirees in the OP count as 2 individuals, while you probably count as 1 individual. So, no difference really. 

 

German pensions for individuals for individual labour are not high. Swiss, Dutch, and even Greek pensioners are better off. But Germany has all kinds of family add-ons for households (not for individuals), and these get higher and higher. The retirees in the OP obviously don't get these family add-ons, and that's why they had to leave Germany. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, chrisandsu said:

When a country spends more money on housing , feeding , healthcare , police , on a section of the country who will contribute next to nothing other then a kebab then they do on their own people who created the prosperity then they should be ashamed . 

I do agree that the government should do more to make sure retirees are able to make a living of their retirement benefits, which would mean that a complete overhaul of the system will have to take place, but the way the state treats refugees is something Germans should be proud of, I am!

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, candide said:

You conveniently omitted a part of the quote in order to support your prejudiced view. The exact quote is:

"Others in that category interviewed by Reuters here cited the perception that asylum seekers were getting more financial support than pensioners."

Others...perception...

 

More generally, Germany's problem is the decrease of population so that there are not enough young people to pay for old people's pensions. Immigration is the only way for Germany to finance pensions and to maintain growth.

You are right in as much as the decrease of population is one factor, but even with more young people paying in, the present system can't make sure that pensions allowing low income earners to lead a decent life on retirement are paid. A complete overhaul is needed, following the Dutch system, or the Swiss one. If the present system isn't overhauled, it will go bust, unless the tax payer supports it to the tune of 75 to 85%, which no government can afford.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

When we work in the UK we have to pay into a national fund to pay for our health care and pension provision. We are not offered the choice, there is no choice unless we want to pay for additional arrangements. I believe it's a similar arrangement in the Fatherland. Living abroad maybe a choice but it is certainly not a privilege.

 

As it is a UK pensioner could never afford to live overseas unless he has made the necessary additional arrangements. But few of them have been in a position to do so. Millions of our OAPs live on about 6000 baht a week. That speaks for itself.

 

When you retire you should be able to live where you like and draw your pension and receive health care when needed. We've paid for it after all. The gimmegrants rarely have.

 

Liberal politicians have been so eager to flood our countries with hordes of useless bloodsucking immigrants that they've realised finally that there are no longer sufficient funds in the pot. So who has to suffer, the very people who have in some cases spent a lifetime hoping to fill that same pot up.

 

But it's our own fault because we've been too stupid for too long and too scared of being called racists to do anything about it.

Remember the so-called "German re-unification in 1989 when milions of East Germans threatened to occupy West Germany if they don't get Deutsche Mark? 

That's where big parts of West German pensions went - just to make Germany Great again.

 

And then came millions of Germans from Russia. Most of them could not speak a word of German. But they called themselves Germans, so they had not to claim asylum to get pampered by the German nanny state.  

 

The Arabian and African immigrants came much later so they can't be the reason why the German pensions are so low. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheDark said:

What is this all about?

 

I thought pensions are more like 2500 to 3500 euros per person?

What's going on here? Are pensions around Europe really that low in general? 1200 per person or even 600 per person?

That's <deleted> up. 

The average Thai would love to have a pension of 1,200 euros a month.  Most of the Thai Immigration officers who process our yearly visa's barely have two nickels to rub together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micmichd said:

Remember the so-called "German re-unification in 1989 when milions of East Germans threatened to occupy West Germany if they don't get Deutsche Mark? 

That's where big parts of West German pensions went - just to make Germany Great again.

 

And then came millions of Germans from Russia. Most of them could not speak a word of German. But they called themselves Germans, so they had not to claim asylum to get pampered by the German nanny state.  

 

The Arabian and African immigrants came much later so they can't be the reason why the German pensions are so low. 

You see we in the UK we don't hear too much about that.

 

According to the BBC the 'new Germans' are integrating nicely and their eagerness to fit in and work are the reason why the country and its economy is prospering.

 

However we did hear Merkel say back in 2010 that the multicultural experiment in Germany has been a massive failure. But we naturally assumed that she must have been on the schnapps to come out with such obvious nonsense.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

You see we in the UK we don't hear too much about that.

 

According to the BBC the 'new Germans' are integrating nicely and their eagerness to fit in and work are the reason why the country and its economy is prospering.

 

However we did hear Merkel say back in 2010 that the multicultural experiment in Germany has been a massive failure. But we naturally assumed that she must have been on the schnapps to come out with such obvious nonsense.

  

All studies suggest the BBC is right: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2019/05/how-has-germanys-economy-been-affected-by-the-recent-surge-in-immigration.html

 

But maybe the US FED doesn't know much about economics? Who knows.

 

 

Quote

By the numbers: Most unauthorized immigrants in Europe lived in Germany (1 million–1.2 million), the U.K. (800,000–1.2 million), Italy (500,000–700,000) or France (300,000–400,000).

  • Unauthorized immigrants account for no more than 2%, and in most cases less than 1%, of populations in countries across Europe.

In the U.S., meanwhile, Pew's estimate as of 2017 is 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants, or 3.2% of the total population.

  • While nearly half in the U.S. hail from Mexico, that's only the case for 20% of those arriving in the last five years, with similar numbers coming from Northern Triangle countries (17%) and countries in Asia (23%).

There's also no difference in terms of illegal immigration between the UK and germany: https://www.axios.com/illegal-immigrants-europe-uk-germany-refugees-6e4b8556-a263-4db2-9a03-b8ebc8276423.html 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...