Jump to content

Greta Thunberg calls on world leaders to listen to young activists


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Absolutely, if we want to save the planet for human habitation. If we don't voluntarily reduce population to perhaps 1950s level, Nature will do it for us, IMO.

Won’t work as China’s failed and disastrous one child policy proved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Disagree it is the main cause. 
 

No was afraid in the 50s as they were not aware of the fact we were destroying our climate. 
 

Tell me, how would you enforce population control?

The methods are numerous, disease, famine, war etc, read the Georgia Stones,

Earths sustainability is the objective.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, talahtnut said:

The methods are numerous, disease, famine, war etc, read the Georgia Stones,

Earths sustainability is the objective.

It's obvious to anyone with eyes to see that a population of billions all wanting "stuff" will exploit the planet's raw materials to exhaustion, and then what happens- war happens.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump made such a fool of himself, by essentially saying "I am bought and paid for by corporate America. They are my masters, and i am an obedient servant to them." No analysis or science is required. And as we all know, he is not a science guy anyway. That stuff is way too complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's obvious to anyone with eyes to see that a population of billions all wanting "stuff" will exploit the planet's raw materials to exhaustion, and then what happens- war happens.

Man made ecological disasters will result in a shortage of food supplies and drinkable water ... Wars for resources will occur . 

 

Anyway , happens already , only for oil and gas yet ...

Edited by nobodysfriend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's obvious to anyone with eyes to see that a population of billions all wanting "stuff" will exploit the planet's raw materials to exhaustion, and then what happens- war happens.

That’s a weird extrapolation. We ain’t in medieval times. But there again looking at how US try to control the oil field in ME by fictitious reasons to wage wars, perhaps we back in time. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

I will take this as your acknowledgement that there were concerns about climate change long before Greta’s telling those old fossil deniers. 

"fossil deniers" What a truly daft thing to say about people who disagree with all the CC hysteria.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Absolutely, if we want to save the planet for human habitation. If we don't voluntarily reduce population to perhaps 1950s level, Nature will do it for us, IMO.

And that is happening voluntarily. Nearly all of the developed countries have reduced their population growth drastically, either by policy, or by the people. Thailand is down to 1.44 per 1,000, from nearly 6,5 per thousand 40 years ago. Some are now negative. The real issue with regard to population growth is Africa and a few Arab nations. China, India, and this region is totally under control. China abolished the one child policy, and families still do not want to have more than one child. The world seems to be getting smarter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Same way the Chinese did.

Albert Einstein Is alleged to have said the definition of insanity is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result. Whether he did or not, I agree with the sentiment of the quote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

And that is happening voluntarily. Nearly all of the developed countries have reduced their population growth drastically, either by policy, or by the people. Thailand is down to 1.44 per 1,000, from nearly 6,5 per thousand 40 years ago. Some are now negative. The real issue with regard to population growth is Africa and a few Arab nations. China, India, and this region is totally under control. China abolished the one child policy, and families still do not want to have more than one child. The world seems to be getting smarter. 

Wouldn't be a problem if the countries that are overpopulating themselves kept all their people at home, but instead they keep sending the excess population to countries that have got their population increase under control. Doesn't matter if rich countries are not over breeding if their populations still increase with immigration.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, faraday said:

"fossil deniers" What a truly daft thing to say about people who disagree with all the CC hysteria.

 

 

Actually factual. Most American youths concurred with youths around the world on climate change and more concerned than their elders. Elders shouldn’t be selfish to deny the next generation of a better world. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nobodysfriend said:

At least partly - it is .

More people - more pollution 

more pollution - faster climate change

It is now too late anyway to reverse what happened already ... time to concentrate at least on reducing man made pollution and prepare for a future that does not look good ... ( do not buy beachland ...55 )

Cannot support enforced sterilisation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...