Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Farmers burning sugarcane face additional fees for milling their crop

Recommended Posts

I think I saw in my newsfeed from The Bangkok Post that last year the government passed a bill allowing only an allotment of 20 percent burned sugarcane for milling. And that just this past November the cabinet decided to increase it to 50 percent. Perfect timing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, webfact said:

Sugarcane growers, who burn their crops before harvesting, will be charged 30 baht/tonne for the burnt sugarcane delivered to sugar mills, while the mills will be levied 12 baht/tonne for accepting burnt cane exceeding the set limits.

Charge them to make extra money instead of prosecuting them, the Thai solution to all things !

And who's going to do the checks at the mills?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Crossy said:

Unless I'm going mad (quite possible) I recall a very similar headline a few months back.

 

The net result has been, of course, zero.

 

better than expected  then!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can  just  imagine the Thai inspector...........owner,  so  youre  the new inspector, you see that burnt  sugar  cane  arriving......it  isnt is  it? 1000 baht................. but maybe  one of them is a bit stricter.....ok 2000 baht................ok  final  offer  ,  pulls out  gun waves machete............... inspector.........what  burnt sugar sir?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it costs the farmers more for labor to not burn, but they have zero concern about the millions of people that are faced with serious continuing health issues due to their actions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should  be military striker tanks at  sugar cane plants.  Absolutely no burnt cane.   Sorry if you burnt yours this year.   You get 50%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The burning of sugar cane and the air pollution and damage to the environment it causes is a hidden production cost which up until now society has borne. It's great that this practice is being eliminated, but expecting the farmer to shoulder the additional production costs that come from harvesting without burning is completely unreasonable. The farmer has to be compensated for these higher costs which will ultimately mean higher consumer prices for sugar.

 

Edit: Speaking for myself, I would happily pay a higher price for sugar if it meant breathing cleaner air.

Edited by Gecko123

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:

The farmer has to be compensated for these higher costs which will ultimately mean higher consumer prices for sugar.

I thought this was mainly about ethanol? 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can not prohibit the burning process. IT is not working. Would be more useful to support the sugar cane harvester machines. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as there is a way to pay, the pollution will stay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From my personal point of view,  and I was going that way anyway if the burning continues and affects the areas I want to be in I will be spending as little as possible/no time there in the future. My wife will spend quality time with her family , largely indoors and with the air purifier on. The smoke situation has finally made the should I / shouldn't I dilemna a very easy one. Life's too short to spend the time choking on the air if you have a choice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 30la said:

It will end as always, a "small" offer to the right person and the fine is buried.

nah,  sugar  price  will  go  up  on the shelves to cover it............in effect no change except  price increase, 40  baht a ton is  peanuts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, zydeco said:

I thought this was mainly about ethanol? 

yeah  i  feel  all environmentally friendly  now when i  fill  up.................shame  all that  pollution offsets it  by  a  mile. Environmentally nuts.as  usual

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, webfact said:

Sugarcane growers, who burn their crops before harvesting, will be charged 30 baht/tonne for the burnt sugarcane delivered to sugar mills, while the mills will be levied 12 baht/tonne for accepting burnt cane exceeding the set limits

Mickey mouse solution, charge the 30,000THB ton and you will see the sugar deadly business will end !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The fees will be charged by the Sugarcane and Sugar Committee’s Office and paid to farmers who do not burn their crops, as an incentive to continue the practice.

During the 2018-19 sugarcane harvest season, about 20 million tonnes, or 49.1% of all the cane that were sent to sugar mills was burnt.

It's a step in the right direction to use economy, but it's a question if the fee is high enough...

5 hours ago, Crossy said:

At a raw cane price of about 800 Baht per tonne (latest price I could find) a total levy of 42 Baht per tonne for burnt cane  = about 5%.

How much is saved by a farmer burning the sugar cane, instead of using labor to cut it?

If a penalty fee shall make sense, it shall be a benefit not to burn it...:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...