Jump to content

Integrity Pact 'successful' in curbing corruption


rooster59

Recommended Posts

  8Thats great but still like right now my wife has had to dob in people lighting fires in public land and farming yet again and the people organizing this is the mayor, orbator secretary, and old mayors assistant. Seems they make there own projects to steal money!! Seems this pact thing doesnt really help the shear greed these people have.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Pedrogaz said:

If the Integrity Pact is so successful, how come Thailand slipped once again in Transparency International rankings????

Ahh I see against our own internal subjective benchmarks (that we control) we improved. Everyone in the department got a gold star.

Gold stars. Who got the balloons????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2020 at 6:16 AM, rooster59 said:

Under the Integrity Pack, three parties must sign the procurement contract comprising the government agency that owns the project, the entrepreneur providing the products or services

How does this work when the "entrepreneur" is a joint venture with a state-owned enterprise?

If appearance of collusion is to be prevented, no state-owned enterprise should be allowed to participate in bids for government contracts.

On 1/26/2020 at 6:16 AM, rooster59 said:

third-party observer who possesses knowledge, expertise and experience related to the project,

As a signatory to a contract, a third-party might be liable for execution of the contract - no matter whether the liability arises directly or indirectly, with or without knowledge of contractual irregularities.

  • Assuming a third-party is truly independent from the government and entrepreneur, one would doubtful not have any means of check & balances to detect contract irregularities without full access to all actions conducted between the government and the entrepreneur.

And this raises another question as to how a third-party is selected and paid without creating a potential conflict of interest with either the government or entrepreneur.

  • In a perfect world where Thailand Constitutional Organizations serve as institutional checks & balances in government affairs, such third-party might be selected and funded by the NACC.
  • Such third-party should not be acting on its own cognizance and without authority to investigate and require full disclosure of contractual processes and information.

IP's has a good idea but it could potentially lead to worse corruption that operates under the veil of due process. Furthermore, there appears to be institutional checks & balances already in place to accomplish the same goals. But it's more a matter of Existing Institutions doing their job in accordance with the laws and heir constitutional authority.

IP's solution seems to add another administrative layer of red tape just to project an image of fighting corruption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...