Jump to content

Trump's 'massive' U.S.-UK trade deal faces big hurdles


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump's 'massive' U.S.-UK trade deal faces big hurdles

By David Lawder

 

2020-01-27T232559Z_3_LYNXMPEG0Q0ZP_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRADE-BRITAIN.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson welcomes U.S. President Donald Trump at the NATO leaders summit in Watford, Britain December 4, 2019. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Britain is the United States' closest ally but their long friendship may be sorely tested as the two countries try to forge a new trade agreement after Britain's exit from the European Union.

 

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Saturday in London that he was optimistic that a bilateral deal with Britain could be reached as soon as this year.

 

But Mnuchin gave up no ground after a second meeting with his UK counterpart, Sajid Javid. Javid has insisted that Britain will proceed with a unilateral digital services tax, despite a U.S. threat to levy retaliatory tariffs on British-made autos.

 

Mnuchin told reporters after Saturday's meeting that such taxes would discriminate against big U.S. tech companies like Alphabet Inc's Google, Apple Inc, Facebook Inc and Amazon.com.

 

The UK Treasury declined to comment on the private meeting.

 

The divide highlights the challenges ahead as the Trump administration seeks a new bilateral agreement with Britain, part of a broader push to rebalance relations with nearly all its major trading partners.

 

The stakes are high - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has pegged the trade deal with United States as a way to ease the pain of breaking with Europe, Britain's largest trade partner. U.S. President Donald Trump, has promised a "massive" trade deal to support Brexit, the product of a populist movement similar to his "America First" agenda.

 

The goodwill and special relationship the two countries have enjoyed for decades may not count for much, experts say.

 

"Trump is not going to be doing Johnson any favors," said Amanda Sloat, a senior fellow with the Brookings Institution in Washington. "He's not going to give him a trade deal without major concessions."

 

Even before the digital tax issue arose, the Trump administration threatened to tax foreign car imports, which could hit British-made Jaguar, Land Rover, Mini, and Honda Civic hatchback cars.

 

Stiff U.S. trade demands include increased access for U.S. farm goods, concessions that will be difficult for Britain's entrenched natural food culture to swallow.

 

The United States also wants Britain to change the way its National Health Service prices drugs and allow in more U.S. pharmaceuticals, which could prove politically unpopular for Johnson's government.

 

Washington's demand that London block Chinese telecoms equipment maker Huawei Technologies Co Ltd for national security reasons could also cloud talks.

 

Reaching a meaningful deal will be "exceedingly difficult," said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. "There are very deep-rooted issues on which the United States and the UK are diametrically opposed."

 

Differences over those and other issues meant three years of U.S.-European Union trade negotiations ran aground during the Obama administration.

 

CAR TARIFF THREAT

Tensions boiled over at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

 

Mnuchin raised the threat of car tariffs after Javid's pledge to proceed with the digital services tax. If officials "just arbitrarily put taxes on our digital companies, we'll consider arbitrarily putting taxes on car companies," Mnuchin said.

 

British officials struck back.

 

"Let me be absolutely clear, UK tax policy is a matter for the UK chancellor, it's not a matter for the U.S., it's not a matter for the EU, it's not a matter for anybody else," Trade Minister Liz Truss said.

 

Britain exported $11 billion in passenger cars, engines, tires and other automotive components to the United States in 2018, the largest sector in a total of $127 billion in exports.

 

Eliminating the existing 2.5% U.S. car tariff and averting future auto tariffs will be a high priority for Britain in the talks.

 

Britain will also seek greater access to U.S. state and local public procurement contracts, and services such as U.S. coastal shipping. But those are areas governed by U.S. laws, and a trade agreement may not apply.

 

CHLORINE CHICKEN

The U.S. negotiating objectives published https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Summary_of_U.S.-UK_Negotiating_Objectives.pdf last year by the U.S. Trade Representative's (USTR) office seek to grow U.S. farm exports to Britain.

 

That includes the removal of non-tariff barriers, such as restrictions on chlorine-treated chicken, genetically modified crops and hormone-treated meat. Such products are common in the United States but shunned in Britain.

 

The United States is also pressing for full market access for U.S. pharmaceutical products and medical devices. That would require changes to Britain's NHS pricing restrictions, and could increase the cost of drugs in Britain.

 

In comments https://www.phrma.org/-/media/Project/PhRMA/PhRMA-Org/PhRMA-Org/PDF/PhRMA-Comments-on-US-UK-Trade-Agreement.pdf to the USTR last year, a U.S. pharmaceutical trade group argued that the NHS' cost controls for pricing "innovative" drugs did not "recognize their value to patients and society."

 

That is not likely to sway British officials. "The NHS is a religion in the UK. That's where the real red line is," said Sam Lowe, a senior research fellow at the Centre for European Reform in London. "If the U.S. is saying: 'Pay more for medicine,' that's quite difficult to get past the Treasury and the taxpayers."

 

Some analysts say Washington's best bet is a limited "Phase 1" deal with Britain, as was recently signed with China. Such an agreement would not likely require approval by the U.S. Congress.

 

That would provide short-term political victories for both Britain's Johnson and Trump, said Lowe. Trump is seeking re-election in November.

 

A mini-deal could focus on financial services and convergence on some product and services regulations. It would fall far short of a deal that provides an alternative to Britain's unfettered access to the European Union that both Trump and Johnson have promised.

 

(Reporting by David Lawder; Additional reporting by William Schomberg and Andrea Shalal; Editing by Heather Timmons and Peter Cooney)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-01-28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Tug said:

You assume a lot just because I think trump is unfit to be potus doesent make me a lefty and to assume I wish the U.K. harm is straight up insulting trump has proven time and time again he won’t give up anything unless he gets something in return be careful dealing with him

That is, what is making "deals" about!

Negotiate, like its your "own" money.

Not only "harmonizing" on the tax payers cost.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bannork said:

I wouldn't be seen dead in Pattaya unless the hearse had done a 600 km detour.

It's all going to end in tears for the 'oven made', ' 30 free trade deals ready to sign the day after we leave the EU'.

And now the Japanese have said no trade deal with the UK until the trade deals between the UK and EU are settled first.

Get back to the EU, boys.

Still

"Cloud-Cookoo-Land". More or less, it doesn't matter where exactly.

But I think that is one of the reasons to stay here. ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

I wonder if the people of the UK are actually aware of the level of contamination and adulteration of US food products? Under EU regulations the UK was party to the ban on the use of  or import of food containing a  variety of known or suspect chemicals. US  citizens  may believe in the FDA  but 85% of processed foods produced in the US contain GMO's which the FDA does not require any safety testing on !

Good luck then to the UK if they are so willing to be reverse colonized  by the US.

 

GMO's are really not that big of a deal when it comes to safe consuming of the food. The bigger risk of GMO's is that these modified plants can be made resistant to some weed killers etc. which can kill other crops. This can lead to monopolies of food farming. 

 

There are also other, more serious problems with the food in USA. Using lots of antibiotics and especially hormones to make chickens, big and cows to grow larger with more muscles. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Maitdjai said:

Still

"Cloud-Cookoo-Land". More or less, it doesn't matter where exactly.

But I think that is one of the reasons to stay here. ????

Funnily enough, one of the reasons I prefer living in Thailand to life in the UK is how much more real life seems here. No work, no food. You want to sell street food? Start tomorrow.

The endless regulations of English life, the tidy countryside and cute Cotswold cottages, all conspired to give me the sense I wasn't living in a real land. Just a number in an over-restrictive environment.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, evadgib said:

We're still leaving on Friday and no amount of whinging will change it.

Now "no amount of whinging", but wait for the time after the year 2020. Especially, if no deal.

Edited by puck2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puck2 said:

Now "no amount of whinging", but wait for the time after the year 2020. Especially, if no deal.

There's a Uri Geller collective in these threads with voodoo dolls full of pins on their computer desks hoping and praying that UK will fail.

Take a good look at yourselves and grown up.

Edited by evadgib
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...