Jump to content

Trump celebrates acquittal with White House pomp, condemns political foes


webfact

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Another billionaire from the dems would be embarrassing. The nice thing is it would keep the undesirables away. 

 

Signed.

 

A deplorable

Carefull what you wish for. Mike has all positive posting in his referral. ty dt:

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-teases-dems-bring-in-mini-mike-bloomberg-asap-should-they-take-his-advice-231150405.html

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

No question we are due for a massive correction. The amount of helium that has been pumped into this economic balloon is unspeakable. Current valuations of real estate and stocks are not even remotely in sync with reality. 

Depends which real estate markets you're talking about. The United States is not a monolithic market. States and areas attracting healthy migration and business, like Texas, have healthy, increasing real estate market prices.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chokrai said:

It will be all the more sweeter when Bloomberg spends a billion dollars and Trump still wins. 

Yep.

 

Those touting Mayor Mike need to consider the Electoral College.  I realize that the EC is like kryptonite to them, but that's how we elect presidents.  Those touting Mayor Mike need to ask themselves: What states will Mayor Mike take away from Trump that he won last time?  THAT is the crux of the entire Democrat conundrum.  What states will ANY Democrat take away from Trump from 2016?

 

And don't forget.  Mayor Mike is anti gun.  That stance alone eliminates LOTS of states from consideration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

Mike doesn't meet the woke joke progressive requirements for non white non male non binary sis gender anti American vegan gluten free zero carbon hateful apologists that are now in control of the democratic party. 

Having a go at fiction writing?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ricohoc said:

Yep.

 

Those touting Mayor Mike need to consider the Electoral College.  I realize that the EC is like kryptonite to them, but that's how we elect presidents.  Those touting Mayor Mike need to ask themselves: What states will Mayor Mike take away from Trump that he won last time?  THAT is the crux of the entire Democrat conundrum.  What states will ANY Democrat take away from Trump from 2016?

 

And don't forget.  Mayor Mike is anti gun.  That stance alone eliminates LOTS of states from consideration.

Funny. You clearly don't want the democrats to win and now you're trying to talk down Mike Bloomberg. Sounds just like the leader of the cult of personality movement -- he's most afraid of Bloomberg. The way it's shaping up now with Biden fading and no clear large majority leader emerging or likely to emerge -- is a brokered convention. A brokered convention won't be nominating Bernie or Warren or Biden. The natural choice of a brokered convention will be Bloomberg, Klobuchar, or even Deval Patrick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Funny. You clearly don't want the democrats to win and now you're trying to talk down Mike Bloomberg. Sounds just like the leader of the cult of personality movement -- he's most afraid of Bloomberg. The way it's shaping up now with Biden fading and no clear large majority leader emerging or likely to emerge -- is a brokered convention. A brokered convention won't be nominating Bernie or Warren or Biden. The natural choice of a brokered convention will be Bloomberg, Klobuchar, or even Deval Patrick.

Why not talk down Bloomberg? He's a big government, totalitiarian thug. I think I'll keep my Big Gulp. And rest assured his security people will keep the guns they want to ban us peasants from having.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Slickrick said:

You can keep dreaming about Mike maybe unhinged but Trump will be around a while.  

Bloomberg unhinged? I'm not picturing that. 

Yes 45 may be around for awhile but where exactly? Prison? Mar Lago? In exile? Or possibly the white house, God forbid.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, candide said:

In brief: what a moron!

Not really. He just had a huge victory against his political foes. It is to be savored. And now with a great jobs report out, higher-than-expected wage growth and favorable polling information, there's plenty for all Americans to be happy about.

Edited by Crazy Alex
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Not really. He just had a huge victory against his political foes. It is to be savored. And now with a great jobs report out, higher-than-expected wage growth and favorable polling information, there's plenty for all Americans to be happy about.

Ok, then he savors it in a moronic way

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yeah sure. More personal profits for 45. This is totally corrupt banana republic type stuff, and yet the 45 cult of personality followers applauds it.


 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-service-has-paid-rates-as-high-as-650-a-night-for-rooms-at-trumps-properties/2020/02/06/7f27a7c6-3ec5-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html

The accusation says "as high as...." What is the average rate? Under what circumstances did the $650 rate occur? For what type of room? How many rooms cost that much? Why? Are those rates out of the norm for a hotel of that caliber during that time of the year?

 

The point is, it's easy to have a hissy fit over a $650 room rate. Knowing the details is imperative to understanding whether it's out of line or not.

 

There's oversight on issues like what government pays for hotel rooms. You do know this, yes?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Now it gets uglier. Now that he's been confirmed to be totally above the law by the complicit senate, he's now totally unrestrained, and just imagine how much even worse it would get if he never has to run for election again. Nixon had his enemies list. 45's list is expanding to the majority of the country. These are very dark times now. Of course not surprising from someone that was mentored by one the greatest villains in American history -- Roy Cohn. 


 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/07/why-trump-is-so-vindictive/

Yes, it's geting especially ugly now: for Democrats.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Slickrick said:

You can keep dreaming about Mike maybe unhinged but Trump will be around a while.  

Careful what you wish for cult. Todays news started with another Mike's first. 

https://www.msnbc.com/hallie-jackson/watch/fmr-navy-secretary-richard-spencer-endorses-bloomberg-for-president-78323781936

Edited by earlinclaifornia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ricohoc said:

Yep.

 

Those touting Mayor Mike need to consider the Electoral College.  I realize that the EC is like kryptonite to them, but that's how we elect presidents.  Those touting Mayor Mike need to ask themselves: What states will Mayor Mike take away from Trump that he won last time?  THAT is the crux of the entire Democrat conundrum.  What states will ANY Democrat take away from Trump from 2016?

 

And don't forget.  Mayor Mike is anti gun.  That stance alone eliminates LOTS of states from consideration.

Arizona, Florida, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska's second congressional district, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Chiphigh said:

Mike doesn't meet the woke joke progressive requirements for non white non male non binary sis gender anti American vegan gluten free zero carbon hateful apologists that are now in control of the democratic party. 

BUT he dose meet the "ANYBOY BUT trump" 61 percent that lists as most important

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Not really. He just had a huge victory against his political foes. It is to be savored. And now with a great jobs report out, higher-than-expected wage growth and favorable polling information, there's plenty for all Americans to be happy about.

I dont think impeachment is a victory, but up to you.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JHolmesJr said:

I hate to break it to you but it was not an acquittal and there are a few more cases about emoluments against him. One of them will go to supreme court.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

The accusation says "as high as...." What is the average rate? Under what circumstances did the $650 rate occur? For what type of room? How many rooms cost that much? Why? Are those rates out of the norm for a hotel of that caliber during that time of the year?

 

The point is, it's easy to have a hissy fit over a $650 room rate. Knowing the details is imperative to understanding whether it's out of line or not.

 

There's oversight on issues like what government pays for hotel rooms. You do know this, yes?

How about he just doesnt use his own properties. You know, the businesses he said he would put in a blind trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Careful what you wish for cult. Todays news started with another Mike's first. 

https://www.msnbc.com/hallie-jackson/watch/fmr-navy-secretary-richard-spencer-endorses-bloomberg-for-president-78323781936

Fantastic.

I thought from the start that Bloomberg had at least a small chance of being nominated (if nominated, for him beating 45 will be a cakewalk). I also thought Bloomberg is seriously no dummy and he's been clear for a long time that he would never run for president if he didn't see a possible path as well. 

But frankly it was hard to imagine that Bloomberg would have risen so fast in these still early stages.

Democrats want a candidate they can get behind, get excited about, who is super competent, and most of all can beat 45.

More or more, Bloomberg seems to be that candidate.

I realize Sanders has deep loyalty but he really, really does not have that full list.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Depends which real estate markets you're talking about. The United States is not a monolithic market. States and areas attracting healthy migration and business, like Texas, have healthy, increasing real estate market prices.

The prices in New York, which historically have been a bellwether for the rest of the nation, and typically happen about two years prior to the rest of the nation following suit, have been dropping for over a year now. Properties which were selling for near asking prices, and selling within 15 days, are now being discounted by up to 30% or more, and taking an average of 450 days to sell. Same with higher end properties in Los Angeles. Likewise, the rental markets at the higher end, have been dropping in both areas. Just wait. The US is in for some massive financial reckoning. The economy is a house of cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...