Jump to content

Bloomberg buffeted by recording of him discussing crime, minorities


webfact

Recommended Posts

Bloomberg buffeted by recording of him discussing crime, minorities

By Jason Lange

 

2020-02-11T182552Z_1_LYNXMPEG1A1N4_RTROPTP_4_USA-ELECTION-BLOOMBERG.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg visits the Dollarhide Community Center for a campaign event in Compton, California, U.S. February 3, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Cullen

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, rising in public opinion polls in recent weeks, found himself on the defensive on Tuesday over newly surfaced remarks from 2015 in which he said 95% of murderers and murder victims were minorities.

 

The remarks ricocheted across social media after U.S. President Donald Trump posted an audio recording on Twitter, a sign Bloomberg faces greater scrutiny as he seeks the Democratic nomination for November's election.

 

Bloomberg has long struggled with the legacy of the "stop-and-frisk" policing policy he used as mayor of New York, which encouraged police to stop and search pedestrians and ensnared disproportionate numbers of blacks and Latinos.

 

For years after his 2002-2013 mayorship, Bloomberg defended the tactic as an effective way to save lives, only to apologise for it a few days before announcing his candidacy in November.

 

The recording that circulated on Tuesday included especially blunt language. Bloomberg is heard saying police need to be where the crime is, "which means in minority neighbourhoods."

 

"95% of your murders - murderers and murder victims - fit one M.O.," Bloomberg said. "You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male; minorities 16 to 25."

 

"The way you get the guns out of the kids' hands is to throw them up against the walls and frisk them," Bloomberg said in the recording.

 

New York police data shows close to 95% of victims and suspects in murder cases were minorities in 2015.

 

'I HAVE APOLOGISED'

"WOW, BLOOMBERG IS A TOTAL RACIST!" Trump wrote in a later-deleted tweet despite having endorsed the stop-and-frisk policy himself.

 

Tom Steyer, another Democratic presidential hopeful, said Bloomberg's comments were "deeply disturbing" and Symone Sanders, an adviser to Joe Biden's campaign, told Fox News the remarks were "sad and despicable."

 

African-American voters are expected to make up about a quarter of Democratic voters in the race to represent the party in the 2020 vote.

 

Bloomberg has gone to great pains to court the black vote, including a proposal unveiled last month to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans.

 

On Tuesday, he restated his apology over stop-and-frisk, saying he had reduced its use by 95% by the time he left office.

 

"I should have done it faster and sooner. I regret that and I have apologised," Bloomberg said. "I have taken responsibility for taking too long to understand the impact it had on black and Latino communities."

 

Bloomberg is not competing in the first four Democratic nomination contests but is mounting an expensive nationwide campaign ahead of the March primaries. He has risen in public opinion polls while spending hundreds of millions of dollars on television advertisements.

 

Some Trump advisers have privately expressed concern about Bloomberg as a potential threat to Trump's re-election because of his ability to spend massively from his personal fortune.

 

A spokesman for Trump's election campaign did not respond to requests for comment on the president's support for stop-and-frisk and why Trump deleted the tweet. The White House declined comment on why Trump deleted the tweet.

 

Trump caused controversy in 2017 when he said there were "fine people" on both sides of a deadly conflict at a white nationalist rally in Virginia that was disrupted by counter-protesters.

 

(Reporting by Jason Lange in Washington; Additional reporting by Jeff Mason and Steve Holland in Washington; Editing by Howard Goller)

 

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-02-12
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

U.S. presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, rising in public opinion polls in recent weeks, found himself on the defensive on Tuesday over newly surfaced remarks from 2015 in which he said 95% of murderers and murder victims were minorities.

And what´s wrong with delivering the facts? Oh yes! I forgot. The people in US want a lying piece of 5hit for the next president too. Hard to not follow tradition, I guess.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ramen087 said:

Yet another Thai visa forum member who knows what three hundred million plus people in a country of 3.75 million square miles wants... mind boggling.

Hmmm. Not 100% sure. However, if you look back in the near history the last 10-15 years, it surely od look like I am not far from the truth. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matzzon said:

And what´s wrong with delivering the facts? Oh yes! I forgot. The people in US want a lying piece of 5hit for the next president too. Hard to not follow tradition, I guess.

If by tradition you mean the old adage...How do you know when a politician isnt lying? He isnt talking....then you are spot on.

 

Show me the politician and I will show you the lie!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, webfact said:

"95% of your murders - murderers and murder victims - fit one M.O.," Bloomberg said. "You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male; minorities 16 to 25."

 

New York police data shows close to 95% of victims and suspects in murder cases were minorities in 2015.

So he stated the fact - that 95% of suspects and victims in murders were minorities, which is actual data from police. What's racist about stating the facts? It might have been racist had it not been true and just made up, like the tweets coming from a certain house that has white walls. Like "muslims celebrating in NYC when WTC collapsed"...

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jesimps said:

If it is true and provable that 95 percent of murderers and victims are minorities, why apologise for saying so? Rhetorical question.

True or not, Bloomberg is trying to get nominated in the democratic party where strong support from blacks and Latinos is required. No point in being naïve. 

 

This recording and probably others to come is damaging to Bloomberg but hardly fatal. People already knew his long record with stop and frisk so though rough and raw, it really shouldn't shock anyone. So worst case he might need to spend an extra billion to smooth things over.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’s only one thing you need to know about Bloomberg.

 

Regardless of how his candidacy goes, he’s putting his money into getting rid of Trump.

Good for Mr Bloomberg. If you've got it, use it.  image.jpeg.d238e6956197828efc12d146efa4d90e.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2020 at 3:50 PM, Jingthing said:

Well, Bloomberg faces a very tough road to the democratic nomination but a much easier road to beat 45 if nominated. He is a politician. A very skilled and successful one at that.

 

Stop making pie in the sky.....skilled and successful...says who.

Yesterday some guy took a selfie with him and said "hey mike 

say stop and frisk"...and he ACTUALLY DID.

 

What a loser! He's finished now.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the question of who is best to win against 45 in a landslide, my heart says Amy and my head says Mike. It would be nice to have a choice that touches both, but either one will do nicely, thank you very much. Yes, Mike matches against 45 perfectly. The stark direct contrasts between decency and indecency can be made, again and again in the context of two New Yorkers. 

 

I really think it would be self destructive for the democrats to nominate anyone other Amy or Mike. Mayor Pete might be a third tier choice but significantly riskier with his super thin experience.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all Bloombergs wealth he has the personality of a dishrag.

No vision to run on...just managed to not screw up after Giuliani cleaned up NYC.

No achievement platform like Trump...no support from critical swing groups.

Just a bunch of people who are desperately clinging to him so Bernie doesnt 

get elected. Wouldn't it be funny if Berne bros stayed home come nov 2020.

Or better still, voted for Trump. 4 more years easy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

For all Bloombergs wealth he has the personality of a dishrag.

No vision to run on...just managed to not screw up after Giuliani cleaned up NYC.

No achievement platform like Trump...no support from critical swing groups.

Just a bunch of people who are desperately clinging to him so Bernie doesnt 

get elected. Wouldn't it be funny if Berne bros stayed home come nov 2020.

Or better still, voted for Trump. 4 more years easy.

I think Bloomberg is broadcasting an excellent vision in his ad campaign. It's not about not wanting Bernie to be elected. It's about not wanting him to be nominated because that's who 45 wants to run against as it will be so easy to run "Venezuela" ads 24/7 against him and cream him.

 

 

 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...