neeray Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 23 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said: What kind of people would want to have a leader like that? There's about a dozen of them right here on this forum. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said: This response is incorrect. You need to read the FISA report once more. Read it yourself. I did two things, I read it and I understood it. The FBI acted within the law. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 On 2/13/2020 at 9:55 AM, Jingthing said: No American president is elected to be an autocratic dictator. No American president is elected to be above all laws. No American president is elected to corrupt the justice system. He's a rogue and he's permanently damaging American democracy as well as the USA's role in the world. Decent Americans will never stand silent for that! I am a decent American, and during the impeachment the President's approval ratings went up. The Democrat party is in total meltdown, numbers are way down, headed for a contested convention, a communist leading the pack. The President has exposed weakness and corruption, and the Republic is stronger! 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiphigh Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, candide said: She's been vetted by the defense lawyer, right? The defense objected 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 On 2/13/2020 at 10:36 AM, Sujo said: The last impeachment thing got him impeached. Acquitted and Not Guilty forever! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 51 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said: No...the defence objected but judge overruled. In legal terms this will be argued as miscarriage of justice among other things. Mistrial! Another lie: "THE COURT: Mr. Buschel, you have a motion? MR. BUSCHEL: No. THE COURT: Okay, let's bring in the next juror." https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/is-there-a-stone-jury-scandal-not 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, Chiphigh said: The defense objected Just now, candide said: Another lie: "THE COURT: Mr. Buschel, you have a motion? MR. BUSCHEL: No. THE COURT: Okay, let's bring in the next juror." https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/is-there-a-stone-jury-scandal-not See above 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 On 2/13/2020 at 11:18 AM, OneMoreFarang said: The part that troubles me is how the GOP politicians and voters are willing to ignore their own constitution, the laws, and even basic common sense to support that guy. They can't be possibly so blind not to see what Trump is doing. This is not about politics. If Americans want a far right leader they can and should elect him. And if they want to change their laws to give the president all the power and make him king then they should do that. But in the moment the USA is still supported to be a democracy based on laws. And everybody has to follow those laws. And the laws are the same for everybody. Is that really so difficult to understand? How would GOP politicians and supporters have reacted if any DEM president would have behaved like Trump? That's a no-brainer. And they would have been right. But with Trump? Everybody closes their eyes as much as they can. No, we don't want to see the truth. Somehow we think it will get better, somehow. Here is a hint: It won't get better until someone stops that maniac. It will get worse. How long do you want to wait until you stop him? What does he have to do before you say enough is enough? Thinks about it. And then act. Now! We don't need any hints thank you. Your entire characterization Is wrong. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimmer Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Off topic inflammatory post removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 22 hours ago, Mavideol said: Putin is fighting hard trying to change Russia's constitution to be president/dictator for life, he's following Chinese Xi Ji Ping steps and Trumps is trying to copy both of them This is a made up assertion about President Trump with zero factual basis. Even as opinion, there is no foundation of reality to form such an opinion. It's like saying Trump is about to launch nuclear weapons, or is in Putin's pocket, or is a racist. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 21 hours ago, blazes said: Ah, this is comedy at its finest: the "USA's role in the world"....shall we mention... erm...Persia (1948), Korea (1950-53), Vietnam (1954-75); Chile (1973); and so many places in Latin America it's not worth listing them; and so many "interventions" and wars in the Middle East, not worth listing ...too many. Many "decent Americans" will indeed not 'stand' for that....they are too busy pushing up the daisies in too many graveyards around the world..... It's tough to be a superpower, but someone's got to do it. Please stop calling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JHolmesJr Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 42 minutes ago, Chiphigh said: The defense objected And the judge steamrolled it through anyway. Huge pain coming for her....totally discredited. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 16 hours ago, Tug said: Imo it’s the way trump relies on partisanship and his info lying news bs he Pitts us against each other and relying on raw emotional support many Americans don’t think through how they are beeing used and quite frankly some are to stupid to know the difference as a side note some posters imo are possibly payed some stripend to post negative things and creat the illusion trump is right Don't call Trump supporters stupid. It's all about policy man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 14 hours ago, Sujo said: Then you really must hate trump for not prosecuting them. What do you say about that. A United States Government year University textbook would be a good place for you to answer your own question. But I will help, John Durham is a very busy man at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 14 hours ago, rhyddid said: Very correct, a President can not say to a court of law to be lenient or heavy in sentencing, justice shall do its course and Judge shall rule according to the law, not a fancy president will, if we are still in democracy! A US President can publicly speak his mind any time he wants, and offend anyone he wants, he can call out the Supreme court or shout about prosecutors all day long. He can even have a "fancy" will, whatever that means. ???? 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 hour ago, candide said: She's been vetted by the defense lawyer, right? Actually no. The judge vetted the jury. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugocnx Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 16 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said: Respect for pro Trumpers? Wow! That reminds me of the mafia. You just have to respect the boss. Otherwise bad things will happen to you. Why should we respect people who support a [inset all the parts which would be censored] person? Goes to show. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugocnx Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 15 hours ago, Sujo said: If you know facts, hard for a trump supporter, the prosecutors gave the sentencing submission then 16 hours later the doj decided they didnt like it. But the judge doesnt need to to agree. Another example for the denigration of Trump supporters, this time by you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Off topic deflection posts, troll posts and the replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sujo Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, hugocnx said: Another example for the denigration of Trump supporters, this time by you. I know. Facts hurt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 34 minutes ago, spidermike007 said: It is very easy to make such a conclusion. One of the first things Putin did, when he came to power, was to erode the power of the judiciary. Exactly what Trump appears to be doing. Fortunately, for the first time, Barr appears to be speaking out. I think he is genuinely afraid of being disbarred over this latest Stone episode. Trump's actions on this one are indefensible, so do not even try. You will simply make a fool of yourself. Spider, appointing conservative judges is what conservative Presidents do, where do you read this stuff? Get out of the bubble man, read a 1st year Uni textbook, and set your mind at ease. Barr being disbarred? Have you listened to what Barr has said? He says the prosecutors tried to pull a fast one. Enough of the crazy Trump nonsense. He is going to be re-elected in a landslide. 3 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugocnx Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 9 minutes ago, Sujo said: I know. Facts hurt. Which facts are you referring to or did you talk about? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoreFarang Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 hour ago, neeray said: There's about a dozen of them right here on this forum. I wouldn't worry if only a dozen people would support that maniac. I am concerned because about 60 million Americans do that. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 hour ago, candide said: Another lie: "THE COURT: Mr. Buschel, you have a motion? MR. BUSCHEL: No. THE COURT: Okay, let's bring in the next juror." https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/is-there-a-stone-jury-scandal-not 1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said: And the judge steamrolled it through anyway. Huge pain coming for her....totally discredited. 57 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said: Actually no. The judge vetted the jury. The defense lawyer did not reject her. See above. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHolmesJr Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 19 minutes ago, candide said: The defense lawyer did not reject her. See above. IIRC, there are 12 jurors.....you cant just reproduce a random statement that might have been recorded for an unopposed jury member. Try again....this one is either going to be a mistrial.....or will be appealed.... and if sentencing is to occur it will be under more realistic guidelines. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 (edited) 19 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said: IIRC, there are 12 jurors.....you cant just reproduce a random statement that might have been recorded for an unopposed jury member. Try again....this one is either going to be a mistrial.....or will be appealed.... and if sentencing is to occur it will be under more realistic guidelines. "Hart (identified only as Juror 1261, but identifiable by her statement that she ran for Congress and other biographical details) was questioned by the trial judge and by defense counsel." By the way, it's you and your mates who claim the defense lawyer did object. Where is your evidence? You did not provide any. (Not Trump's tweets, please) Edited February 14, 2020 by candide 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mavideol Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Trump came in with a bang and will be gone with a whimper (tale between his legs) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chiphigh Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 20 minutes ago, Mavideol said: Trump came in with a bang and will be gone with a whimper (tale between his legs) Really? What is your prediction method? Or is it just another tds thing? 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post WalkingOrders Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said: I wouldn't worry if only a dozen people would support that maniac. I am concerned because about 60 million Americans do that. Yeah, I am part of that group. Don't concern yourself, only five more years to go. 3 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JHolmesJr Posted February 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2020 40 minutes ago, Mavideol said: Trump came in with a bang and will be gone with a whimper (tale between his legs) before you offer commentary try and figure out the difference between tale and tail lol 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now