Popular Post puipuitom Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 9 hours ago, englishoak said: POTUS also has the right and power to pardon... so its nothing new, just its Trump so MUST be bad .. lol the circus show continues. In a normal; democracy, with thew split of powers AFTER the minister of Justice brought this to the president. But NEVER on own initiative. Trump sees his present job the same as his previous: as CEO of a company, in which he is also the main share owner: allowed to cheat, press on business contacts, give me something in return, pay for what I ( = my company) gave you etc. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 1 hour ago, Tippaporn said: What does your above comment have to do with my post? Remember what this topic is about? Emboldened, Trump defends right to interfere in criminal cases My post has nothing to do with proof of Russian interference and everything to do with this topic . . . the hypocrisy of the left to denounce Trump's tweet and accuse him of attempting to interfere with justice when Obama did no less and no one on the left seems to remember. So you remember Obama's tweets denouncing trials, judges, juries, and verdicts? Can you please share them with us? 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tippaporn Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 1 hour ago, bristolboy said: So you remember Obama's tweets denouncing trials, judges, juries, and verdicts? Can you please share them with us? What a cop out. You or none of your pals care to address Obama absolving Hillary on 60 Minutes. That says so much. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tippaporn Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 3 hours ago, Sujo said: Then blame the spineless jelkyfish in the gop for doing nothing. In the meantime stop deflecting with nonsense. You also refuse to address Obama absolving Hillary on 60 Minutes. Who's deflecting? 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippaporn Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 3 hours ago, Sujo said: You posted asking for proof of russian interference. Jeez now we have to tell trump supporters what they asked. You've completely mixed up two posts I made and then accuse me of not being able to keep track. You expose yourself. LOL 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 47 minutes ago, Tippaporn said: What a cop out. You or none of your pals care to address Obama absolving Hillary on 60 Minutes. That says so much. No. He quite carefuly didn't absolve Hillary. He did say that no damage to National Security has been incurred. But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case. Not only that but A.G. Lynch recused herself from making a decision on the case. but rather left it to Comey. Remember that IG Horowitz ultimately reproached Comey not for his decision in the email case, but rather for his gratuitous criticism of Clinton in announcing that decision. Doesn't seem like the FBI was intimidated in the least. Whereas now we have an AG who launches extraordinary outside investigations both targeting Trump's enemies and the convictions of his allies. 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post wwest5829 Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 11 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said: I don't see it as "interfering" as such. Trump is just pointing out the sheer hypocrisy of the current justice system. A system that punishes only one side of the political divide while giving the other side a free pass each and every time. Just look at McCabe for example who admitted to lying to the FBI and got let off, while Flynn and Stone did similar and got the book thrown at them. A justice system that punishes only one side is not justice, it is tyranny. Stacking juries with extreme anti Trump activists is also a hallmark of tyranny. If it weren't for Donald's twitter feed so many would not have realized this happened. Trump is right to point out these absurdities, and I hope he continues to do so. It is very much in the public interest. Let’s see if I understand this correctly. In the U.S., if a law enforcement agency charges that a crime has been committed, they refer the charges to a Prosecutor, if the Prosecutor thinks there is enough evidence, they present the evidence to a Grand Jury of citizens drawn from those registered to vote. If the citizen Grand Jury finds that the evidence is substantial enough to hold the accused over, then a trial is scheduled. In the Trial, a separate Trial Jury, selected from the registered voters and subject to approval of both the a Prosecution and a Defense. But all this is controlled by those who are anti Trump? If that be the case, Trump should surely vacate the office as all of American society rejects him (I think only the majority disapprove of him). 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post wwest5829 Posted February 15, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 15, 2020 2 hours ago, Tippaporn said: You also refuse to address Obama absolving Hillary on 60 Minutes. Who's deflecting? Sorry... I seem to have lost the plot. What is the subject of this post. The subject is Trump ... stop deflecting. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tug Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 53 minutes ago, rhyddid said: Already trying to justify what its illegal and undemocratic interference into the Judiciary system. This President can do anything and i say anything that his voters will always justify him. The guy you responded to isent an American everyone is intitled to an opinion it’s like a certain part of our body’s everyone has one some opinions are expressed just to get a reaction it’s all certain posters are interested in he’s certainly not a voter lol we see what trumps about won’t be around much longer neither will barr 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tippaporn Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) 19 hours ago, bristolboy said: No. He quite carefuly didn't absolve Hillary. He did say that no damage to National Security has been incurred. But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case. Not only that but A.G. Lynch recused herself from making a decision on the case. but rather left it to Comey. Remember that IG Horowitz ultimately reproached Comey not for his decision in the email case, but rather for his gratuitous criticism of Clinton in announcing that decision. Doesn't seem like the FBI was intimidated in the least. Whereas now we have an AG who launches extraordinary outside investigations both targeting Trump's enemies and the convictions of his allies. From the NYT piece on Oct. 15, 2015: "Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing. "The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time." From a june 15, 2018 piece by National Review: "Obama repeatedly went on national television, beginning with an October 2015 60 Minutes interview, to argue his own conclusion that Hillary had done nothing to warrant any prosecution. Career DOJ prosecutors were aghast:" Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski visibly aghast on the July 16, 2016 Morning Joe episode: "And here you have the chief law enforcement officer of the United States deciding almost a year before the findings come out that there's nothing to see. That is frightening." Now what were you saying about "he quite carefully didn't absolve Hillary?" Here's your chance to link to your source. You further state: "But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case." Here's the full text from the Obama CBS interview with Steve Kroft, both Part 1 & Part 2, from Oct. 11, 2015. Nowhere does he even come close to stating what you claim. Again, here's your opportunity to cite your source. My feeling is that you're just purposely fabricating out of whole cloth. The rest of your post has no relevancy to the point I've made that Obama did no differently than what the left is accusing of Trump's tweet. The respective AGs have no bearing whatsoever so why even bring it up. Aside from that, there is a significant difference between Trump's tweet and Obama's conclusions regarding Hillary's email crime. Obama made his comments about an open and ongoing criminal investigation. Trump's tweet on the other hand was regarding an extremely harsh sentence he thought was unfair. Which it was to any other people except rabid liberals who believe it's just to imprison a person for up to 9 years on process crimes while the average rapist serves 4 years. I know, completely unbalanced but the idea of fairness and justice for libs is whatever suits them. This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is: To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr. One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street. Edited February 16, 2020 by Tippaporn 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Tippaporn said: From the NYT piece on Oct. 15, 2015: "Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing. "The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time." From a june 15, 2018 piece by National Review: "Obama repeatedly went on national television, beginning with an October 2015 60 Minutes interview, to argue his own conclusion that Hillary had done nothing to warrant any prosecution. Career DOJ prosecutors were aghast:" Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski visibly aghast on the July 16, 2016 Morning Joe episode: "And here you have the chief law enforcement officer of the United States deciding almost a year before the findings come out that there's nothing to see. That is frightening." Now what were you saying about "he quite carefully didn't absolve Hillary?" Here's your chance to link to your source. You further state: "But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case." Here's the full text from the Obama CBS interview with Steve Kroft, both Part 1 & Part 2, from Oct. 11, 2015. Nowhere does he even come close to stating what you claim. Again, here's your opportunity to cite your source. My feeling is that you're just purposely fabricating out of whole cloth. The rest of your post has no relevancy to the point I've made that Obama did no differently than what the left is accusing of Trump's tweet. The respective AGs have no bearing whatsoever so why even bring it up. Aside from that, there is a significant difference between Trump's tweet and Obama's conclusions regarding Hillary's email crime. Obama made his comments about an open and ongoing criminal investigation. Trump's tweet on the other hand was regarding an extremely harsh sentence he thought was unfair. Which it was to any other people except rabid liberals who believe it's just to imprison a person for up to 9 years on process crimes while the average rapist serves 4 years. I know, completely unbalanced but the idea of fairness and justice for libs is whatever suits them. This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is: To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr. One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street. So you understand the President must not interfere in the Justice system. However, rather than condemn Trump for having done so you offer whataboutary. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tippaporn Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: So you understand the President must not interfere in the Justice system. However, rather than condemn Trump for having done so you offer whataboutary. Here's what I understand: Accuser: So when did you stop beating your wife? Accused: <deleted> are you talking about. I never beat my wife. Accuser: So you're denying it!!! That's what libs/Dems do. Make false accusations and when someone tries to defend themselves the Dems claim that their accusations are true by the mere fact that the person accused is defending themselves. It doesn't work with me. Nor does it work with Trump. Here's classic Trump turning the tables on a hack reporter asking Trump what lessons he's learned from impeachment. You see, the question itself implies an admission of guilt. Well, Trump ain't guilty and the reporter didn't get the soundbite he was after. Your question is purposely designed to imply that guilt has already been established as fact. It's so much BS. Again, not falling for it. Go and try and trick someone else. Edit: Almost forgot to mention. The "whataboutary" is all about pointing out the Dem/lib hypocrisy in denouncing Trump's tweet and making it sound as nefarious as possible when no one said boo about Obama doing much worse and consider him a saint. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippaporn Posted February 16, 2020 Share Posted February 16, 2020 So here's is the Democrat insanity on full display as Eric Swalwell considers Trump's tweet an impeachable offense. "He's acting now to corrupt the department of justice and we're going to act immediately. We have a meeting on the Judiciary committee, an emergency meeting, to decide what's next . . . " https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2020/02/12/lead-rep-swalwell-live-jake-tapper.cnn Unbelievable that the Dems just fell flat on their faces with an attempt to remove Trump via impeachment due to articles of impeachment that were so overwhelmingly lacking yet here they want to go another round on a charge that is many degrees weaker than their previous charges. And Trump's tweet justifies an emergency meeting of the Judiciary committee? These people are truly insane(ly filled with hatred). Does this apply: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.” - Albert Einstein 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Share Posted February 16, 2020 3 hours ago, Tippaporn said: From the NYT piece on Oct. 15, 2015: "Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing. "The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time." From a june 15, 2018 piece by National Review: "Obama repeatedly went on national television, beginning with an October 2015 60 Minutes interview, to argue his own conclusion that Hillary had done nothing to warrant any prosecution. Career DOJ prosecutors were aghast:" Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski visibly aghast on the July 16, 2016 Morning Joe episode: "And here you have the chief law enforcement officer of the United States deciding almost a year before the findings come out that there's nothing to see. That is frightening." Now what were you saying about "he quite carefully didn't absolve Hillary?" Here's your chance to link to your source. You further state: "But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case." Here's the full text from the Obama CBS interview with Steve Kroft, both Part 1 & Part 2, from Oct. 11, 2015. Nowhere does he even come close to stating what you claim. Again, here's your opportunity to cite your source. My feeling is that you're just purposely fabricating out of whole cloth. The rest of your post has no relevancy to the point I've made that Obama did no differently than what the left is accusing of Trump's tweet. The respective AGs have no bearing whatsoever so why even bring it up. Aside from that, there is a significant difference between Trump's tweet and Obama's conclusions regarding Hillary's email crime. Obama made his comments about an open and ongoing criminal investigation. Trump's tweet on the other hand was regarding an extremely harsh sentence he thought was unfair. Which it was to any other people except rabid liberals who believe it's just to imprison a person for up to 9 years on process crimes while the average rapist serves 4 years. I know, completely unbalanced but the idea of fairness and justice for libs is whatever suits them. This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is: To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr. One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street. "President Obama said Hillary Clinton exhibited "carelessness" in handling emails, but defended his former secretary of State and "guaranteed" that politics will not influence an ongoing investigation of her, in an appearance on Fox News Sunday. "I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI — not just in this case, but in any case," Obama said in the pre-taped interview that broadcast Sunday." https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/04/10/barack-obama-fox-news-sunday-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-ted-cruz-chris-wallace/82862338/ And as I pointed out, the Attorney General at the time recused herself from the investigation and left it to the FBI. And James Comey was rebuked by the Inspector General of the Justice department for condemning Clinton in announcing his decision to prosecute. The same James Comey who 2 weeks before the elections, announced publicly that the FBI was going to search Anthony Weiner's computer for any emails from Hillary Clinton that breached security. Maybe if Barr recused himself from these investigations, you might have a better point. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 3 hours ago, Tippaporn said: Aside from that, there is a significant difference between Trump's tweet and Obama's conclusions regarding Hillary's email crime. Obama made his comments about an open and ongoing criminal investigation. Trump's tweet on the other hand was regarding an extremely harsh sentence he thought was unfair. Which it was to any other people except rabid liberals who believe it's just to imprison a person for up to 9 years on process crimes while the average rapist serves 4 years. I know, completely unbalanced but the idea of fairness and justice for libs is whatever suits them. This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is: To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr. One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street. Roger Stone threatened another witness if he gave unfavorable testimony. That's a very serious crime. As for Bill Barr, keep in mind that during his first stint as Attorney General, he recommended a pardon for everyone under investigation in the Iran Contra scandal. Barr’s Push for Iran-Contra Pardons Likely to Emerge in Confirmation Hearing When President George H.W. Bush pardoned six Reagan administration officials involved in the Iran-Contra scandal in 1992, he had the blessing of a powerful ally: then-Attorney General William Barr. Mr. Barr, now President Trump’s pick for attorney general, recommended the pardons of former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and five others, saying later he thought they had been “unjustly treated” by a special counsel who charged them with offenses including lying to Congress. https://www.wsj.com/articles/barrs-push-for-iran-contra-pardons-likely-to-emerge-in-confirmation-hearing-11546002000 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 3 hours ago, Tippaporn said: This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is: To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr. One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street. Right. It's the Democrats attempting to sully the Justice Dept. Here are few choice words from someone you apparently believe is a Democrat: President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania on Tuesday night lashed out at the FBI, calling staff of the agency "scum."... Trump repeated claims the FBI had "spied" on his 2016 campaign. The report, released the day before by the Justice Department's inspector general, Michael Horowitz, had found such a characterization to be groundless. Here are the Russia probe conspiracy theories debunked by the DOJ inspector general report https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/09/russia-conspiracy-theories-inspector-general-report-079474 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sujo Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 10 minutes ago, bristolboy said: Right. It's the Democrats attempting to sully the Justice Dept. Here are few choice words from someone you apparently believe is a Democrat: President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania on Tuesday night lashed out at the FBI, calling staff of the agency "scum."... Trump repeated claims the FBI had "spied" on his 2016 campaign. The report, released the day before by the Justice Department's inspector general, Michael Horowitz, had found such a characterization to be groundless. Here are the Russia probe conspiracy theories debunked by the DOJ inspector general report https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/09/russia-conspiracy-theories-inspector-general-report-079474 Oh enough with the facts. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post muzley Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 Judge Andrew Napolitano's view on the affair. I remember he was being quoted and posted on here by those who were in favour of trump's impeachment, as he was, as a great legal authority. I'm pretty sure he won't be viewed the same way by the left this time around!! 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Share Posted February 16, 2020 On 2/15/2020 at 11:49 AM, JHolmesJr said: Trump has republican voters and independents on his side. Most of them see through the vile machinations of the establishment cogs that have been turning for decades...and appreciate that the president is trying to expose and correct this. Comey , McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Page, Strzok and all the other shady actors belong in jail for staging a coup attempt. Thanks for sharing the results of your poll with us. Can you please give us some insight into your methodology? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) 18 minutes ago, muzley said: Judge Andrew Napolitano's view on the affair. I remember he was being quoted and posted on here by those who were in favour of trump's impeachment, as he was, as a great legal authority. I'm pretty sure he won't be viewed the same way by the left this time around!! Actually, Napolitano says that court should have looked into her political views. But as we now know, Trump's lawyers did exactly that in the voir dire. And she disclosed her political history to them. https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/is-there-a-stone-jury-scandal-not Here is the entire transcript of the voir dire. The interviewing of the juror begins on page 34. https://www.scribd.com/document/446913716/Roger-Stone-jury-selection-transcript-Nov-5-2019 Edited February 16, 2020 by bristolboy 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chiphigh Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 After three years of targeted phony accusations from within the government by partisan govt agencies including the doj what the heck do you expect. If these treasonous govt stooges are not indicted, the govt is lost. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JHolmesJr Posted February 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 16, 2020 4 hours ago, bristolboy said: Thanks for sharing the results of your poll with us. Can you please give us some insight into your methodology? I'll be happy to share something better...the results of the 2020 election. Can you spell Trump Landslide? 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted February 16, 2020 Share Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) 55 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said: I'll be happy to share something better...the results of the 2020 election. Can you spell Trump Landslide? When you haven't got the facts, then invoke the future. The future is wonderful that way. It can be anything you want it to be. Except real. And Jesus is coming back any day now, too. Edited February 16, 2020 by bristolboy 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mlmcleod Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Now that Trump knows that there is no act he can commit with impeachment consequences, he is having fun being dictator. The payback against Republicans is going to be huge in the 2020 elections. The senate Republicans seem to be happy to act as the band playing as the Titanic sank! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiphigh Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 14 hours ago, bristolboy said: When you haven't got the facts, then invoke the future. The future is wonderful that way. It can be anything you want it to be. Except real. And Jesus is coming back any day now, too. Refer to post 85.....???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Nick Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 On 2/15/2020 at 7:38 AM, Chomper Higgot said: Bernie isn’t going to be a candidate Which -umfortunately- will seal Trumps victory! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Nick Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 On 2/15/2020 at 11:49 AM, JHolmesJr said: Trump has republican voters and independents on his side. Most of them see through the vile machinations of the establishment cogs that have been turning for decades...and appreciate that the president is trying to expose and correct this. Comey , McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Page, Strzok and all the other shady actors belong in jail for staging a coup attempt. Trump IS the establishment! H is millionaire hotel owner, employing illegal aliens at minimum wage, looking out for his own ilk and doesn't give too hot bowlmovements about "workers" and the plebs! I find it baffeling, that you can not see that! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 29 minutes ago, Chiphigh said: Refer to post 85.....???? But he wasn't using it as an irrelevant and evidence-free reply to another post that contained detailed evidence. Which is what JHolmesJr did. It's the kind of response someone uses when they have nothing relevant to reply with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHolmesJr Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, bristolboy said: But he wasn't using it as an irrelevant and evidence-free reply to another post that contained detailed evidence. Which is what JHolmesJr did. It's the kind of response someone uses when they have nothing relevant to reply with. It's logical....the Dems are running around like headless chickens...they cant even nominate a sane person to contest. Saw the uproar among Bernie bros....woman grabs mike from sanders.....bernie im your biggest supporter....please dont use cows for research....then 2 naked women on the stage throwing red paint over themselves....bernie is kryptonite. Bloomberg is an elitist fool....heaping scorn on farmers and working class...he wants everyone to be a coder. He's out too. Klobuchar.....another mess. Buttegieg...just a white guy who thinks he's Obama....be very afraid...enough said. I dont need to pore over internet links....I trust my own powers of observation and intellect. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said: It's logical....the Dems are running around like headless chickens...they cant even nominate a sane person to contest. Saw the uproar among Bernie bros....woman grabs mike from sanders.....bernie im your biggest supporter....please dont use cows for research....then 2 naked women on the stage throwing red paint over themselves....bernie is kryptonite. Bloomberg is an elitist fool....heaping scorn on farmers and working class...he wants everyone to be a coder. He's out too. Klobuchar.....another mess. Buttegieg...just a white guy who thinks he's Obama....be very afraid...enough said. I dont need to pore over internet links....I trust my own powers of observation and intellect. Did you see the video of Trump "conducting the National Anthem" and generally behaving in a deranged fashion while everyone else was standing at attention with hands over hearts? One kind of wishes he had a drinking problem. At least that way his behavior would have some external cause. Got any comparable behavior to show from the Democratic candidates? Ya think that video isn't going to get a lot of airtime in the elections? Anybody can do cherrypicking. It's clear that your ability to sift through data with any degree of objectively is virtually a null quantity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now