Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

Emboldened, Trump defends right to interfere in criminal cases

Recommended Posts

Trump defends right to interfere in criminal cases

Come on Donald, how much longer do we have to wait for you to rewrite the Holy Bible!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Trump defends right to interfere in criminal cases

Just like Putin. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Comment please.

 

Obama’s Comments About Clinton’s Emails Rankle Some in the F.B.I.

 

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

 

What selective memories libs/Dems have.  Simply amazing, too, that when "interference" is done by a Democratic president the libs/Dems don't say boo but if it's a Republican, well, that's grounds for impeachment.  Twisted logic and perverse reasoning.  LOL

Just make you vote count! Clowns occupy both sides of the fence!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A nasty bit of work and a dangerous man, he wants to be a dictator... hope Americans see the light before it's too late.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Bernie isn’t going to be a candidate 

Same thing they said about Trump. But does not matter Trump will win all about the money US markets at all time highs.

Yeeehaaaa!

Edited by bkk6060
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as I said before....nothing more than an orchestrated stunt by Barr & Trump with ABC complicity trying to boost DOJ self confidence, it's all too obvious, thanks to the bad actors/acting easy to detect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Proof, my man, proof.  Biased opinions based on what someone desperately wants to believe amounts to . . . zero.  Give us proof!

why do you keep wasting time asking for things that have already been provided to you. Surely your memory isnt that bad.

 

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/25/8930616/senate-intelligence-report-russia-50-states

 

Even putin admitted it.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Comment please.  Explain how this is different.

 

Obama’s Comments About Clinton’s Emails Rankle Some in the F.B.I.

 

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

 

What selective memories libs/Dems have.  Simply amazing, too, that when "interference" is done by a Democratic president the libs/Dems don't say boo but if it's a Republican, well, that's grounds for impeachment.  Twisted logic and perverse reasoning.  LOL

no need to comment, not mixing apples and oranges.... you guys are specialists at that, not me, Trump telling DOJ to go easy on his friends has absolute;y nothing to do with Hilary's e-mails even if I agree that was wrong but it would be a complete different post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Comment please.

Putin’ attack on justice by pushing a narrative weakening faith in the rule of law as administered by the justice system in Russia and its being copied by Trump. 
 

Your example is illogical and has false equivalency. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

So did McCabe lie or not?

Yes, but not a sufficient cause to progress to criminal charges. Whereas trump lies and misinforms every day he is in power. Begs the question why DoJ is not laying charges for falsifying evidence. I understand a President cannot be charged by DoJ for criminality whilst in power which to my mind is ridiculous, a ruling that must be challenged by way of a change to the Constitution.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Comment please.  Explain how this is different.

 

Obama’s Comments About Clinton’s Emails Rankle Some in the F.B.I.

 

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

 

What selective memories libs/Dems have.  Simply amazing, too, that when "interference" is done by a Democratic president the libs/Dems don't say boo but if it's a Republican, well, that's grounds for impeachment.  Twisted logic and perverse reasoning.  LOL

aren't you tired of all that conspiracy theory.....Republican senator found plenty of evidence, what else do you guys need....

New Senate Intelligence report shows “extensive” Russia 2016 election interference

It also notes that Russia targeted voting systems in all 50 states.

For the past two and a half years, the panel led by Chair Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC)

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, worgeordie said:

The Dick-tator can do anything now...God help America.

regards Worgeordie

 

wasn't sure who to vote for til i heard about "grabbing pussy" then it was a no brainer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...