Jump to content

Emboldened, Trump defends right to interfere in criminal cases


rooster59

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Sujo said:

You posted asking for proof of russian interference.

Jeez now we have to tell trump supporters what they asked.

You've completely mixed up two posts I made and then accuse me of not being able to keep track.  You expose yourself.  LOL

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, rhyddid said:

Already trying to justify what its illegal and undemocratic interference into the Judiciary system.

This President can do anything and i say anything that his voters will always justify him.

 

The guy you responded to isent an American everyone is intitled to an opinion it’s like a certain part of our body’s everyone has one some opinions are expressed just to get a reaction it’s all certain posters are interested in he’s certainly not a voter lol we see what trumps about won’t be around much longer neither will barr

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's is the Democrat insanity on full display as Eric Swalwell considers Trump's tweet an impeachable offense.

 

"He's acting now to corrupt the department of justice and we're going to act immediately.  We have a meeting on the Judiciary committee, an emergency meeting, to decide what's next . . . "

 

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2020/02/12/lead-rep-swalwell-live-jake-tapper.cnn 

 

Unbelievable that the Dems just fell flat on their faces with an attempt to remove Trump via impeachment due to articles of impeachment that were so overwhelmingly lacking yet here they want to go another round on a charge that is many degrees weaker than their previous charges.  And Trump's tweet justifies an emergency meeting of the Judiciary committee?  These people are truly insane(ly filled with hatred).

 

Does this apply:  “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.” - Albert Einstein

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

From the NYT piece on Oct. 15, 2015:

 

"Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

"The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time."

 

From a june 15, 2018 piece by National Review:

 

"Obama repeatedly went on national television, beginning with an October 2015 60 Minutes interview, to argue his own conclusion that Hillary had done nothing to warrant any prosecution. Career DOJ prosecutors were aghast:"

 

Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski visibly aghast on the July 16, 2016 Morning Joe episode:

 

"And here you have the chief law enforcement officer of the United States deciding almost a year before the findings come out that there's nothing to see.  That is frightening."

 

 

Now what were you saying about "he quite carefully didn't absolve Hillary?"  Here's your chance to link to your source.

 

You further state: "But he very explicitly said he was not going to tell the Justice Dept. what to do about the legal merits of the case."

 

Here's the full text from the Obama CBS interview with Steve Kroft, both Part 1 & Part 2, from Oct. 11, 2015.  Nowhere does he even come close to stating what you claim.  Again, here's your opportunity to cite your source.

 

My feeling is that you're just purposely fabricating out of whole cloth.

 

The rest of your post has no relevancy to the point I've made that Obama did no differently than what the left is accusing of Trump's tweet. The respective AGs have no bearing whatsoever so why even bring it up.

 

Aside from that, there is a significant difference between Trump's tweet and Obama's conclusions regarding Hillary's email crime.  Obama made his comments about an open and ongoing criminal investigation.  Trump's tweet on the other hand was regarding an extremely harsh sentence he thought was unfair.  Which it was to any other people except rabid liberals who believe it's just to imprison a person for up to 9 years on process crimes while the average rapist serves 4 years.  I know, completely unbalanced but the idea of fairness and justice for libs is whatever suits them.

 

This should lay to rest this latest ridiculous and baseless accusation as the attempt it is:  To again hamstring the President by setting the whole country off on any wild goose chase while they ignore their primary responsibilities and, IMHO, to also attempt to facetiously discredit and sully the Justice Department and Bill Barr.  One of these days these Democrats won't be able to walk down the street.

 

"President Obama said Hillary Clinton exhibited "carelessness" in handling emails, but defended his former secretary of State and "guaranteed" that politics will not influence an ongoing investigation of her, in an appearance on Fox News Sunday.

"I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI — not just in this case, but in any case," Obama said in the pre-taped interview that broadcast Sunday."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/04/10/barack-obama-fox-news-sunday-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-ted-cruz-chris-wallace/82862338/

And as I pointed out, the Attorney General at the time recused herself from the investigation and left it to the FBI. And James Comey was rebuked by the Inspector General of the Justice department for condemning Clinton in announcing his decision to prosecute. The same James Comey who 2 weeks before the elections, announced publicly that the FBI was going to search Anthony Weiner's computer for any emails from Hillary Clinton that breached security. Maybe if Barr recused himself from these investigations, you might have a better point.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2020 at 11:49 AM, JHolmesJr said:

Trump has republican voters and independents on his side.

Most of them see through the vile machinations of the establishment 

cogs that have been turning for decades...and appreciate that the 

president is trying to expose and correct this.

 

Comey , McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Page, Strzok and all the other 

shady actors belong in jail for staging a coup attempt.

Thanks for sharing the results of your poll with us. Can you please give us some insight into your methodology?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

I'll be happy to share something better...the results of the 2020 election.

Can you spell Trump Landslide?

 

When you haven't got the facts, then invoke the future. The future is wonderful that way. It can be anything you want it to be. Except real.

And Jesus is coming back any day now, too.

Edited by bristolboy
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that Trump knows that there is no act he can commit with impeachment consequences, he is having fun being dictator.  The payback against Republicans is going to be huge in the 2020 elections.  The senate Republicans seem to be happy to act as the band playing as the Titanic sank!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2020 at 11:49 AM, JHolmesJr said:

Trump has republican voters and independents on his side.

Most of them see through the vile machinations of the establishment 

cogs that have been turning for decades...and appreciate that the 

president is trying to expose and correct this.

 

Comey , McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Page, Strzok and all the other 

shady actors belong in jail for staging a coup attempt.

Trump IS the establishment!

H is millionaire hotel owner, employing illegal aliens at minimum wage, looking out for his own ilk and doesn't give too hot bowlmovements about "workers" and the plebs!

I find it baffeling, that you can not see that!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

Refer to post 85.....????

But he wasn't using it as an irrelevant and evidence-free reply to another post that contained detailed evidence. Which is what JHolmesJr did. It's the kind of response someone uses when they have nothing relevant to reply with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

But he wasn't using it as an irrelevant and evidence-free reply to another post that contained detailed evidence. Which is what JHolmesJr did. It's the kind of response someone uses when they have nothing relevant to reply with.

 

It's logical....the Dems are running around like headless chickens...they cant even nominate a sane

person to contest. Saw the uproar among Bernie bros....woman grabs mike from sanders.....bernie

im your biggest supporter....please dont use cows for research....then 2 naked women on the stage 

throwing red paint over themselves....bernie is kryptonite.

 

Bloomberg is an elitist fool....heaping scorn on farmers and working class...he wants everyone

to be a coder. He's out too.

 

Klobuchar.....another mess.

Buttegieg...just a white guy who thinks he's Obama....be very afraid...enough said.

 

I dont need to pore over internet links....I trust my own powers of observation and intellect.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

It's logical....the Dems are running around like headless chickens...they cant even nominate a sane

person to contest. Saw the uproar among Bernie bros....woman grabs mike from sanders.....bernie

im your biggest supporter....please dont use cows for research....then 2 naked women on the stage 

throwing red paint over themselves....bernie is kryptonite.

 

Bloomberg is an elitist fool....heaping scorn on farmers and working class...he wants everyone

to be a coder. He's out too.

 

Klobuchar.....another mess.

Buttegieg...just a white guy who thinks he's Obama....be very afraid...enough said.

 

I dont need to pore over internet links....I trust my own powers of observation and intellect.

 

Did you see the video of Trump "conducting the National Anthem" and generally behaving in a deranged fashion while everyone else was standing at attention with hands over hearts? One kind of wishes he had a drinking problem. At least that way his behavior would have some external cause.  Got any comparable behavior to show from the Democratic candidates? Ya think that video isn't going to get a lot of airtime in the elections? 

Anybody can do cherrypicking. It's clear that your ability to sift through data with any degree of objectively is virtually a null quantity.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...